Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 18 of 8 articles for intra-corporate controversy

Tortious Interference vs. Intra-Corporate Dispute: Jurisdiction in Corporate Conflicts

The Supreme Court clarifies when a corporate conflict is a civil tort case or an intra-corporate dispute, and which court has jurisdiction.

Employment Status and Control Test in Illegal Dismissal Cases: A Guide

Explaining how Philippine courts determine employment status and jurisdiction in illegal dismissal cases, using the Loreche-Amit v. CDMC ruling.

Election Contests and the 15-Day Rule: Eizmendi v. Fernandez on Corporate Governance

The Supreme Court clarifies that indirect attacks on corporate elections violate the 15-day reglementary period for election contests under the Interim Rules.

Upholding Stockholder Rights Jurisdiction In Intra Corporate Disputes Involving Sequestered Entities

The Supreme Court clarifies that intra-corporate disputes involving sequestered firms belong to the RTC, not the Sandiganbayan.

When a General Manager Is Not a Corporate Officer: Jurisdiction Over Illegal Dismissal Claims

The Supreme Court clarifies when a corporate officer is really an employee, and who has jurisdiction over dismissal disputes.

Homeowners Associations vs Non-Members: HLURB Jurisdiction and CMP Benefits

When can a homeowners association evict non-members from CMP land? The Supreme Court clarifies HLURB jurisdiction in Eugenio v. Sta. Monica Riverside Homeowners Association.

SEC Authority Validating Stock and Transfer Books Over Intra-Corporate Disputes

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling that the SEC has regulatory jurisdiction to validate and cancel stock and transfer books.

Pairing Judge Authority: When Orders Become Void After a Regular Judge Assumes Office

A pairing judge's authority ends when the regular judge assumes office. Orders issued after that are void, as Yujuico v. Quiambao shows.