From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–7 of 7 articles for “judicial audit”

When Administrative Complaints Against Judges Are Harassment Suits

The Supreme Court dismisses a judicial audit request targeting two RTC judges, warning against using administrative cases to harass the bench.

When Court Complaints Cross the Line: Lessons from the Tallado v. Racoma Administrative Case

The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, warning against using judicial audits to harass the bench.

When Judges Face Administrative Complaints: The Limits of Judicial Audits

The Supreme Court clarifies when errors in issuing TROs are judicial matters, not grounds for administrative discipline.

Court Funds Mismanagement and Undue Delay: Lessons from a Judicial Audit

A Supreme Court ruling on a judge who borrowed court funds and delayed cases, and the clerks who allowed it.

Accountability in the Courts: Understanding Neglect of Duty and Judicial Audits in the Philippines

A 2006 Supreme Court ruling clarifies the duties of judges and clerks of court in judicial audits, and the consequences of neglect of duty.

When Judges Face Administrative Complaints: The Limits of Judicial Audits and Harassment Suits

The Supreme Court clarifies when errors by judges are judicial matters, not administrative offenses, and warns against harassment suits.

When Administrative Complaints Against Judges Cross the Line: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma

The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, warning against using judicial audits to harass magistrates.