Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Upholding Ethical Conduct: Suspension for Loafing in the Judiciary
Supreme Court suspends court employee for loafing, reaffirming that judicial personnel must strictly observe office hours and professional conduct.
Upholding Integrity: Court Personnel's Duty Against Tampering of Official Records
Supreme Court rules on loafing and case-fixing charges against court personnel, emphasizing integrity and strict observance of official time.
Loafing in Public Service: Consequences for Neglecting Duty
A Supreme Court ruling explains when unauthorized absences during office hours constitute loafing and the penalties that follow.
Loafing in the Workplace: Philippine Law, Penalties, and the Fortaleza Case
Learn what constitutes loafing under Philippine law, its penalties for government employees, and key lessons from a Supreme Court ruling.
Court Personnel Discipline: Incompetence, Drunkenness, and Loafing in the Judiciary
The Supreme Court ruled on disciplining court personnel for incompetence, habitual drunkenness, and loafing, imposing fines despite retirement.
Court Stenographers' Duty of Diligence: Lessons from a One-Year Suspension
A Supreme Court ruling on a stenographer's suspension for inefficiency, loafing, and false logbook entries underscores accountability in the judiciary.
Judicial Employee Misconduct: When Loafing Requires Frequency and Duty Never Takes a Leave
Supreme Court defines "loafing" as requiring frequent absences, but still reprimands RTC employees for misconduct after surprise inspection.
Habitual Tardiness and Loafing at Work: Legal Consequences for Philippine Employees
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on habitual tardiness and loafing: employee responsibilities, penalties, and lessons from Orfila v. Quiroz.