Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 117 of 17 articles for neglect of duty

Serious Misconduct and Employee Dismissal in the Philippines: What Employers Must Prove

Philippine law requires wrongful intent, not just a mistake, to dismiss an employee for serious misconduct. Learn what employers must prove.

Grave Misconduct vs. Simple Neglect: When Can Philippine Officials Be Dismissed?

The Supreme Court clarifies when a public official may be dismissed for grave misconduct and how substantial evidence shapes administrative cases.

Condonation Doctrine: Limits on Administrative Liability for Re-elected Officials

The Supreme Court clarifies the condonation doctrine's scope, applying it only to elected officials re-elected before April 12, 2016.

Illegal Dismissal of Pregnant Employee: SPID Corp. v. Ballesteros Explained

The Supreme Court affirmed that dismissing a pregnant employee without substantial evidence is illegal, reinforcing due process in Philippine labor law.

Police Blotter Duties Clarified: Valderas v. Sulse on Neglect of Duty

Supreme Court clarifies police blotter scope and simple neglect of duty in Valderas v. Sulse, protecting officers from baseless administrative cases.

Constructive Dismissal vs. Just Cause Termination: Key Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies that constructive dismissal and just cause termination are incompatible, reinforcing due process and security of tenure.

Public Office as Public Trust: Lessons from the Deputy Ombudsman Administrative Case

The Supreme Court's ruling against a former Deputy Ombudsman clarifies the administrative offenses of neglect, misconduct, and abuse of authority.

What Happens to an Administrative Case When the Respondent Dies? (Philippines)

Philippine Supreme Court rules on whether death of a respondent ends a pending administrative case, citing due process and heirs' protection.

Valid Dismissal and Separation Pay: Key Lessons from a 2020 Supreme Court Ruling

A 2020 Supreme Court ruling clarifies when dismissal for willful disobedience is valid and when separation pay may—or may not—be granted.

Unauthorized Absences and Dismissal: The Medical Certificate Requirement in Philippine Labor Law

The Supreme Court upheld a dismissal for unauthorized absences, ruling that a vague medical certificate cannot excuse habitual absenteeism.

Probationary Teacher Rights in the Philippines: Non-Renewal and Security of Tenure

When can a private school validly refuse to renew a probationary teacher's contract? The Supreme Court's ruling in St. Paul College vs. Ancheta explains.

Levy on Mortgaged Property in the Philippines: Sheriff's Duties Explained

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that sheriffs may levy mortgaged properties to satisfy judgments, as debtors retain beneficial ownership until foreclosure.

Resignation and Administrative Cases in the Philippines: What Andutan Teaches Us

Can a resigned public official still face administrative cases? The Supreme Court's Andutan ruling clarifies the limits of Ombudsman jurisdiction.

Seafarer’s Illegal Dismissal: Due Process and the Ship’s Logbook in Maritime Cases

The Supreme Court ruled a seafarer’s dismissal illegal for lack of just cause and due process, highlighting the logbook’s evidentiary value.

Sheriff’s Neglect of Duty: When Failure to Implement a Writ Means Dismissal

The Supreme Court held a sheriff liable for grave misconduct and gross dishonesty for failing to implement a writ of preliminary attachment and mishandling funds.

Sheriff’s Authority in Property Levy: What Francisco v. Cruz Teaches About Execution Sales

Learn how Francisco v. Cruz defines a sheriff’s limits in property levy and execution sales, and how to protect your rights.

Execution of Judgment in Ejectment Cases: Why the Court of Origin Matters

In ejectment cases, execution of an affirmed judgment generally belongs to the trial court of origin, not the appellate court. A Supreme Court ruling clarifies why.