Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 19 of 9 articles for personal actions

Venue Stipulations and the Right Remedy: Pillars Property v. Century Communities

The Supreme Court clarifies when a venue stipulation binds parties and why dismissal for improper venue calls for certiorari, not appeal.

Oral Contracts for Property: Six-Year Prescription Bars Stale Claims for Specific Performance

Oral agreements to transfer property must be enforced within six years. Learn how prescription works and why timely action matters.

Maceda Law Protecting Installment Buyers From Improper Contract Cancellations

Learn how the Maceda Law protects installment buyers from improper contract cancellations and what the Supreme Court said about buyer rights.

Venue in Civil Cases: Real Party in Interest's Residence Governs, Even for Plaintiffs Abroad

Philippine venue rules: when a plaintiff resides abroad, the case must be filed where the defendant resides—not where the attorney-in-fact lives.

Venue Rules in Personal Actions: Why the Principal Plaintiff's Residence Matters

Supreme Court clarifies venue rules for personal actions, emphasizing the principal plaintiff's residence determines proper venue, not nominal co-plaintiffs.

Philippine Venue Rules: Suing in the Right Court—Domicile vs. Residence

The Supreme Court clarifies venue rules for personal actions, distinguishing residence from domicile in Saludo v. American Express.

Venue Stipulations in Contracts: Limits on Exclusive Venue Clauses

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when exclusive venue stipulations in contracts apply, and when they cannot restrict access to courts.

Venue in Philippine Breach of Contract Cases: The DAPCO v. Dole Lesson

Learn how Philippine courts determine venue in lease disputes, and why filing in the wrong place can get your case dismissed.

Valid Service of Summons in Revival of Judgment Cases: Jurisdiction Lessons from Arcenas

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when substituted service of summons is invalid in revival of judgment actions, and why courts must acquire jurisdiction over the defendant.