Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Contractual Obligations and Appeal Timeliness: Salendab v. Dela Peña
A look at Salendab v. Dela Peña on the binding force of contracts and the strict rules on appeal periods under Philippine procedure.
The Three-Day Notice Rule: Ensuring Due Process in Motion Hearings
The Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory three-day notice rule for motions and why personal service is preferred in Philippine procedure.
Summary Judgment and Pleadings: What Lazaro v. Brewmaster Teaches About Cause of Action
Understand how the Supreme Court in Lazaro v. Brewmaster clarified summary judgment, pleadings, and cause of action under Philippine procedure.
Certiorari as a Substitute for Appeal: Navigating Procedural Missteps in Philippine Courts
Learn when certiorari can replace an appeal in Philippine procedure, and how the Supreme Court treats loss of trust and confidence in dismissals.
Dismissed on Technicality: Why Proper Procedure Is Key in Philippine Certiorari Cases
A behest-loan case dismissed as moot shows why choosing the right remedy—Rule 65, not Rule 45—matters in Philippine procedure.
Pre-Trial Stipulations Enforceability and Binding Effect on Parties
How stipulations made during pre-trial bind parties and the court, with rules on enforceability under Philippine procedure.
Certiorari vs Appeal: When to Challenge Court Orders in the Philippines
Learn the difference between certiorari and appeal in Philippine procedure, and when each remedy applies to challenge court orders.