From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 25 articles for “plea bargaining”

Navigating Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Understanding the Limits and Safeguards

The Supreme Court clarifies when plea bargaining is allowed in drug cases, the trial court's discretion, and the protection of double jeopardy.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: DOJ Guidelines and Court Discretion in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges, not DOJ circulars, have the final say on plea bargaining in drug cases.

When Courts Can Overrule Prosecution Objections in Drug Case Plea Bargaining

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts may approve plea bargaining in drug cases despite prosecution objections, remanding cases for proper evaluation.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Can a Judge Overrule the Prosecution?

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts may accept plea bargains in drug cases even over the prosecution's objection.

Supreme Court on Plea Bargaining: Courts May Overrule Prosecution's Objection in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts can allow plea bargaining in drug cases despite prosecution objections, citing People v. Montierro.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: The Supreme Court Framework and DOJ Guidelines

The Supreme Court clarifies the rules on plea bargaining in drug cases, balancing judicial discretion with prosecutorial consent under A.M. No. 18-03-16-SC and DOJ Circular No. 18.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discretion Over DOJ Guidelines

The Supreme Court clarifies that trial courts must resolve plea bargaining proposals in drug cases based on evidence, not just DOJ guidelines.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: DOJ Guidelines and Court Discretion in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts may approve plea bargaining in drug cases and the role of evidence in resolving objections.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Balancing DOJ Guidelines and Judicial Discretion

The Supreme Court clarifies how plea bargaining works in drug cases, balancing DOJ Circular No. 027 with judicial discretion under A.M. No. 18-03-16-SC.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Court Rules vs Executive Discretion

The Supreme Court settles the conflict between DOJ circulars and its exclusive rule-making power over plea bargaining in drug cases.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why Prosecutors' Consent Matters Under Rule 116

The Supreme Court voids a drug conviction where the trial court approved a plea bargain over the prosecution's objection, reaffirming Rule 116.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why Prosecutorial Consent Matters

The Supreme Court clarifies that plea bargaining in drug cases requires prosecutorial consent; courts cannot force a plea agreement over the prosecution's objection.

The Prosecutor's Consent in Plea Bargaining: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a prosecutor's consent is indispensable for a valid plea bargain in drugs cases.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: What the Supreme Court's Majingcar Ruling Means

The Supreme Court clarifies when courts may allow plea bargaining in drug cases and the prosecutor's role in the process.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why Prosecutorial Consent Matters

The Supreme Court clarifies that plea bargaining in drug cases requires the prosecutor's consent, and explains the limits of A.M. No. 18-03-16-SC.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Consent Rules, DOJ Circulars, and What the High Court Settled

The Supreme Court clarifies when prosecutors must consent to plea bargains in drug cases and why courts cannot strike down DOJ circulars on their own.

Understanding Theft in the Philippines: Key Insights From a Landmark Supreme Court Case

A look at how the Supreme Court clarifies plea bargaining rules in drug cases and what this means for criminal procedure in the Philippines.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: The Supreme Court’s Stand on Prosecution Consent

A guilty plea to a lesser drug offense needs the prosecutor’s consent. Learn the rules and what the Court said in People v. Reafor.

Plea Bargaining and Government Representation: Lessons from the Garcia Case

The Supreme Court clarifies the OSG's limits in plea bargaining cases and the Ombudsman's authority over Sandiganbayan prosecutions.

Plea Bargaining and Probation in Philippine Drug Cases: Key Insights from a Landmark Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies that probation eligibility depends on the offense of conviction, not the original charge, in drug cases.

Plea Bargaining in Philippine Drug Cases: What the Supreme Court's Sayre Ruling Means

The Supreme Court clarifies plea bargaining in drug cases: prosecutors' guidelines bind the prosecution, not the courts.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why a Framework Alone Does Not Reduce Your Sentence

The Supreme Court clarifies that the plea bargaining framework in drug cases requires an actual guilty plea to a lesser offense—not just a request for leniency.

Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Power Over Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court strikes down Section 23 of RA 9165 as unconstitutional, affirming exclusive judicial authority over plea bargaining rules.

Plea Bargaining and Grave Abuse of Discretion: Balancing Justice and Public Interest

The Supreme Court clarifies when a trial court commits grave abuse of discretion in denying a plea bargain, using Daan v. Sandiganbayan as the guide.