Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 16 of 6 articles for public figures

Libel in the Philippines: When Posting a Complaint Becomes a Crime

The Supreme Court clarifies the elements of libel, including publication and malice, in a case involving posted criminal complaints.

Protecting Press Freedom: Actual Malice and Libel in Public Interest Reporting

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling on actual malice, qualified privilege, and libel in reporting on public officials' conduct.

Libel and Public Interest: When Acquittal Does Not Always Mean Freedom From Civil Liability

Explore the Co v. Muñoz ruling on libel, privileged communication, and when acquittal may still leave room for civil liability claims.

Actual Malice and Media Responsibility in Reporting on Public Figures

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that public figures must prove actual malice to claim damages for false news reports.

Defamation vs. Press Freedom: Balancing Rights in Philippine Law

Philippine Journalists v. Thoenen clarifies when media cannot claim privilege for defamatory reports about private individuals.

Separate Legal Claims WHY Improper Case Consolidation Violates DUE Process

Why the Supreme Court ruled that separate libel complaints against a publisher cannot be consolidated against one defendant without violating due process.