Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
The Immutability of Final Judgments: A Supreme Court Lesson from the DBP-COA Dispute
The Supreme Court ruled that the COA cannot reopen settled accounts beyond the reglementary period, reinforcing the doctrine of immutability of final judgments.
Attorneys Must Inform Clients of Adverse Decisions and Avoid Neglect of Legal Matters
A lawyer's failure to inform clients of a case dismissal and to appeal within the reglementary period constitutes neglect under the Code of Professional Responsibility, warranting suspension.
Election Contests and the 15-Day Rule: Eizmendi v. Fernandez on Corporate Governance
The Supreme Court clarifies that indirect attacks on corporate elections violate the 15-day reglementary period for election contests under the Interim Rules.
Late Certiorari Filing Binds Clients to Counsel's Negligence: Labao v. Flores
Supreme Court rules that a client is bound by counsel's failure to file certiorari on time, stressing strict compliance with reglementary periods.
Judicial Efficiency: The Duty of Judges to Decide Cases Promptly and the Consequences of Delay
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on a judge's duty to decide cases within reglementary periods, and the administrative penalties for undue delay.
Appeal Bond Rules in Labor Cases: Why Posting the Full Bond on Time Matters
The Supreme Court clarifies when appeal bonds in labor disputes may be reduced, and why employers must post the full amount within the reglementary period.
Perfecting Appeals: Strict Adherence to COMELEC Rules on Filing Fees
The Supreme Court underscores that failure to pay the correct appeal fee within the reglementary period is fatal to an election appeal before the COMELEC.
Missed Deadline Dismissed Appeal Why Perfecting Appeals On Time IS NON Negotiable IN Philippine Labor Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on appeal bonds in labor cases: non-posting within the reglementary period is fatal and jurisdictional.
Failure to Resolve Motions Promptly Is Gross Inefficiency for Judges
A judge who fails to resolve pending motions within the 90-day reglementary period commits gross inefficiency and faces administrative sanctions.
Fresh Period Rule for Appeals: The Neypes Doctrine on Reglementary Periods
Learn how the Neypes doctrine gives litigants a fresh 15-day period to appeal after a motion for reconsideration is denied.
Judicial Efficiency: Judge Fined P5,000 for Undue Delay in Resolving a Motion
A judge's failure to resolve a pending motion within the 30-day reglementary period constitutes undue delay, a less serious offense under Rule 140.
Why Deadlines Matter in Appeals: The Rule on Inexcusable Neglect
A one-day late appeal cost a company its case. Learn the strict rule on reglementary periods and inexcusable neglect in Philippine appeals.
The Limits of Judicial Relief: Why a Court Can't Grant What You Didn't Ask For
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on administrative liability of judges who fail to decide cases within the 90-day reglementary period.
Judges Fined for Undue Delay in Resolving Motions: A Lesson in Judicial Efficiency
The Supreme Court fined a judge P11,000 for failing to resolve a motion within the 90-day reglementary period, underscoring the duty of judges to act promptly.
Undue Delay in Resolving Motions: A Judge's Administrative Liability
The Supreme Court clarifies that judges who unreasonably delay resolving motions face administrative sanctions under Rule 140, even without a specific reglementary period.
Judicial Accountability: The Duty to Decide Cases Promptly and the Price of Gross Inefficiency
The Supreme Court fined a retired judge P50,000 for gross inefficiency after he failed to decide 49 cases within the reglementary period.
Attorney Negligence Failure to File Petition Leads to Suspension
A lawyer's failure to file a petition for certiorari within the reglementary period constitutes negligence warranting suspension from the practice of law.
Judicial Accountability: The Imperative of Timely Decision Making in Philippine Courts
Philippine judges must decide cases within reglementary periods. This article examines a Supreme Court ruling on undue delay and its consequences.
Gross Ignorance of the Law: When a Judge Denies a Timely Appeal
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling holds that denying a notice of appeal filed within the reglementary period is gross ignorance of the law, even after the judge retires.
Judicial Accountability: Timely Case Resolution and Efficiency in Philippine Courts
A Supreme Court ruling on a judge fined for delayed case decisions underscores the duty of Philippine judges to resolve cases within reglementary periods.
Holding Judges Accountable Ensuring Timely Justice IN Philippine Courts
The Supreme Court fined a Manila RTC judge for failing to decide cases within the 90-day reglementary period, reaffirming judicial accountability.
Judicial Efficiency vs Negligence: The 90-Day Rule for Judges
Philippine Supreme Court fines judges for failing to decide cases within the 90-day reglementary period, underscoring judicial accountability.
When Delayed Justice Becomes Administrative Liability: The Case of Judge Aquino
The Supreme Court fined a judge P5,000 for failing to decide cases within the reglementary period, reaffirming that delayed justice is denied justice.
Finality of Administrative Decisions: Why Timeliness Matters in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why final and executory administrative decisions cannot be reopened, and the importance of reglementary periods.