From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–4 of 4 articles for “right against double jeopardy”

Understanding Gross Negligence in Public Office: Insights from a Landmark Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of criminal liability for public officers under the Anti-Graft law, emphasizing the right against double jeopardy.

Double Jeopardy and Finality of Acquittal: The Limits of Judicial Recall

A trial court cannot recall a judgment of acquittal to correct an error, even a serious one, without violating the constitutional right against double jeopardy.

Double Jeopardy: Why the Prosecution Cannot Appeal to Increase a Criminal Penalty

The Supreme Court explains why the prosecution cannot appeal a conviction to seek a higher penalty, citing the constitutional right against double jeopardy.

Double Jeopardy Bars Prosecution Appeal to Increase Penalty After Conviction

Philippine Supreme Court rules prosecution cannot appeal to increase a convicted accused's penalty—doing so violates the constitutional right against double jeopardy.