Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
When Judges Are Sued for Judicial Acts: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma
The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, ruling that judicial errors must be questioned through appeals, not disciplinary cases.
Lessons on Judicial Ethics From a Dismissed Administrative Case Against Judges
Supreme Court dismisses administrative complaint against two RTC judges, warning against harassment suits that intimidate the bench.
When Administrative Complaints Against Judges Are Harassment Suits
The Supreme Court dismisses a judicial audit request targeting two RTC judges, warning against using administrative cases to harass the bench.
When Court Complaints Cross the Line: Lessons from the Tallado v. Racoma Administrative Case
The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, warning against using judicial audits to harass the bench.
When Court Errors Are Judicial, Not Administrative: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma
The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, clarifying that judicial errors must be challenged through appeals, not disciplinary cases.
Judicial Ethics: When Judges Squabble, Both Face Administrative Liability
A Supreme Court ruling on two RTC judges fined for a public altercation shows why decorum is a non-negotiable judicial duty.
Judge Fined for Decision Delay Despite Heavy Caseload: Judicial Efficiency and Justice Delayed
The Supreme Court fined a RTC judge for grave delay in deciding a rape case even with heavy caseload, stressing the duty to request extensions.
Upholding Judicial Ethics: Lessons from Administrative Cases Against Baguio City Judges
The Supreme Court's consolidated ruling on administrative cases against Baguio City RTC judges clarifies standards of judicial conduct, propriety, and accountability.
Upholding Judicial Efficiency Sanctions FOR Delayed Case Resolution IN THE Philippines
The Supreme Court fined two RTC judges for gross inefficiency, reaffirming the mandatory 90-day period for deciding cases.
Retroactive Application of Procedural Rules Clarifying Timelines for Certiorari Petitions
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies retroactive application of procedural rules and timelines for certiorari petitions in administrative case against RTC judge.
Judicial Accountability: Timely Resolution of Cases and Public Trust
The Supreme Court fined four RTC judges for delayed decisions, underscoring that judges must decide cases within 90 days or face administrative sanctions.
Judge Reprimanded for Discourtesy: Upholding Judicial Ethics in Philippine Courts
Supreme Court reprimands a Cebu RTC judge for berating a lawyer in open court, reaffirming strict standards of judicial conduct and courtesy.
Judge Not Liable for Denying Motion to Dissolve Writ: Administrative Case Dismissed
Supreme Court clarifies when judges may face administrative liability for erroneous orders, dismissing complaint against Baguio RTC judge.
When Administrative Complaints Against Judges Cross the Line: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma
The Supreme Court dismisses an administrative complaint against two RTC judges, warning against using judicial audits to harass magistrates.
Holding Judges Accountable Ensuring Timely Justice IN Philippine Courts
The Supreme Court fined a Manila RTC judge for failing to decide cases within the 90-day reglementary period, reaffirming judicial accountability.
When Judges Face Harassment Suits: The TRO Rules and Judicial Independence
Supreme Court dismisses administrative case against two RTC judges over TRO issuance, clarifying when judicial errors become disciplinary liability.
When Judges Face Administrative Complaints: Lessons from Tallado v. Racoma and Dating
The Supreme Court dismissed administrative complaints against two RTC judges, clarifying that errors in judicial discretion are not grounds for administrative liability.