Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 19 of 9 articles for rule 117

Double Jeopardy in the Philippines: When an Acquittal Becomes Final

Philippine law protects acquitted persons from retrial through double jeopardy. Learn the rule, its narrow exceptions, and key case law.

Defective Informations and Qualifying Circumstances: Lessons from People v. Pilen

The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Pilen clarifies when defective Informations waive objections and how treachery is proven.

Motion to Quash in Estafa Cases: Grounds, Waiver, and Double Jeopardy Explained

Learn the procedural rules on motion to quash in estafa cases, including waiver of grounds and double jeopardy, from a recent Supreme Court ruling.

Duplicitous Informations and Child Abuse: Understanding Convictions for Multiple Offenses in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies how duplicitous informations can lead to convictions for multiple offenses, and when child abuse charges apply instead of rape.

Amending Defective Criminal Charges: The Lazaro Doctrine on Procedural Flexibility

Learn how Philippine courts amend defective criminal charges to prevent dismissal on technicalities, based on Lazaro v. People.

Double Jeopardy in Philippine Courts: When a Case Dismissal Is Not Final

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling in Cerezo v. People on double jeopardy, valid case dismissals, and when courts may reopen criminal cases.

Withdrawal of Information vs Dismissal: What the Supreme Court Said

The Supreme Court clarifies when a motion to withdraw information is final, and how prosecutors must weigh both sides in preliminary investigation.

Mootness Doctrine and Acquittal: When Court Rulings Lose Relevance

Explaining when court rulings become moot and academic, and how acquittal affects pending criminal cases in the Philippines.

Date Discrepancies in Rape Cases: Substance Over Technicality in Philippine Law

Philippine courts uphold rape convictions despite date discrepancies in the information, prioritizing substantive justice over technical defects.