From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 36 articles for “rule 14”

Undue Delay in Court: When a Judge Is Liable and What the Consequences Are

The Supreme Court explains when a judge's delay in resolving motions becomes administrative liability, and the penalties under the amended Rule 140.

Shariah Court Misconduct: Administrative Liability After Retirement Explained

Learn how the Supreme Court held a retired Shariah judge and clerk liable for neglect and prejudicial conduct under Rule 140.

Mitigating Circumstances and Gross Neglect of Duty: Reassessing Penalties in Judiciary Misconduct

The Supreme Court modifies dismissal to suspension for a clerk of court guilty of gross neglect, appreciating mitigating circumstances under amended Rule 140.

Upholding Judicial Integrity: Tardiness and Disobedience in the Judiciary

Court personnel who are habitually tardy and ignore directives face administrative liability under the Revised Rule 140.

Judicial Integrity Under Scrutiny: Disciplining Misconduct and Upholding Ethical Standards in the Judiciary

Court personnel face dismissal for gross misconduct, insubordination, and conduct tainting the judiciary's reputation under amended Rule 140.

Defective Summons When Improper Service Nullifies Court Jurisdiction

When service of summons misses the persons listed in Rule 14, Section 11, the court never gains jurisdiction—even if a secretary accepts the papers.

Sheriff's P70,000 Demand and 6-Month Delay: Supreme Court on Unauthorized Fees in Writ Execution

Supreme Court rules sheriff liable for receiving P70,000 directly and delaying writ execution, explaining proper fee procedures under Rule 141.

Service of Summons on Corporations: Strict Compliance Required in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that service of summons on corporations requires strict compliance with Rule 14, Section 11, listing only specific officers.

Service of Summons on Corporations: Why Strict Compliance Matters in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that service of summons on corporations must strictly follow Rule 14, Section 11; substantial compliance no longer applies.

Strict Compliance Required for Serving Summons on Domestic Corporations

The Supreme Court clarifies that service of summons on domestic corporations must strictly follow Rule 14, Section 11, or the court lacks jurisdiction.

Court Stenographer Suspended for Collecting TSN Fees Directly From Litigants

SC ruling clarifies court personnel cannot collect TSN payments directly; payments must go to the Clerk of Court under Rule 141.

Sheriffs Must Follow Court-Approved Procedure for Execution Expenses

A sheriff's failure to follow Rule 141 procedure for execution expenses constitutes misconduct, even if the amounts received were reasonable.

Sheriffs' Duties and Liabilities: Proper Handling of Sheriff's Fees and Liquidation

A sheriff's guide to Section 10, Rule 141: how to handle fees, liquidation, and why shortcuts lead to administrative liability.

Execution Pending Appeal in Barangay Election Contests: The San Miguel v. Comelec Rule

Supreme Court clarifies the timing rules for execution pending appeal in barangay election contests under Section 11, Rule 14.

Sheriff Fees and Execution Expenses: What Rule 141 Requires

A sheriff's improper collection of execution expenses leads to suspension, highlighting the strict rules on sheriff fees under Rule 141.

Sheriffs Must Follow Rule 141 in Collecting Execution Expenses: Aprieto v. Lindo

A sheriff who collects execution expenses without court approval violates Rule 141 and faces suspension. Learn the rules from Aprieto v. Lindo.

Sheriffs Must Follow Rule 141 Procedure for Execution Expenses — Key Lessons from Go v. Hortaleza

A deputy sheriff was suspended for demanding execution expenses without court approval. Learn the proper Rule 141 procedure.

Smoking or Vaping in Court Premises: A Less Serious Offense Under Rule 140

The Supreme Court holds court personnel liable for smoking or vaping outside designated areas, imposing fines under Rule 140.

Clerks of Court Upholding Fiscal Responsibility and Public Trust in Handling Court Funds

A clerk of court fined for collecting transportation allowance without issuing official receipts, violating Rule 141 and Supreme Court Circular No. 26-97.

Sheriffs Must Get Court Approval for Execution Expenses: A.M. No. P-06-2184

Philippine Supreme Court rules on sheriff's duty to secure court approval for execution expenses and remit fees under Rule 141.

Court Stenographer Fees in the Philippines: What Rule 141 Allows

Learn the legal rates court stenographers may charge for transcripts under Rule 141, and why overcharging is administrative misconduct.

Sheriffs Must Follow Court-Approved Fee Process or Face Administrative Liability

A sheriff who collected excess service fees without court approval was fined for grave dereliction of duty, clarifying Rule 141 procedure.

Judicial Efficiency: Judge Fined P5,000 for Undue Delay in Resolving a Motion

A judge's failure to resolve a pending motion within the 30-day reglementary period constitutes undue delay, a less serious offense under Rule 140.

Upholding Due Process in Execution Sales: Ensuring Fair Notice and Proportionality

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies sheriffs must follow Rule 141 procedures for execution expenses, ensuring due process and fair notice in levying properties.