From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–11 of 11 articles for “specific performance”

Oral Contracts for Property: Six-Year Prescription Bars Stale Claims for Specific Performance

Oral agreements to transfer property must be enforced within six years. Learn how prescription works and why timely action matters.

Corporate Rehabilitation Stay Orders: What They Mean for Property Claims

The Supreme Court explains how a stay order in corporate rehabilitation suspends all claims, including demands for specific performance of property sales.

Specific Performance vs Rescission: Contractual Remedies Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when specific performance or rescission applies in reciprocal obligations, using a Tagaytay property dispute as guide.

Specific Performance vs Rescission: Upholding Contractual Obligations in Land Sales

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when specific performance prevails over rescission in land sales, protecting the injured party's choice of remedy.

Beyond Boundaries: How Erroneous Land Awards Undermine Property Rights and Due Process

When a buyer is evicted from purchased land, the proper remedy is warranty against eviction—not specific performance. This case explains why.

Perfected Sales vs. Recovery of Property: Understanding Real Actions in Philippine Law

When is a suit for specific performance actually a real action for recovery of property? The Supreme Court clarifies in Jimenez v. Jordana.

Defining Jurisdiction When Specific Performance Claims Outweigh Monetary Demands In Contract Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies RTC jurisdiction over breach of contract cases where specific performance is the main action, not the monetary claim.

Docket Fees and Real Actions: How Property Disputes Determine Court Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court clarifies that complaints for specific performance involving real property are real actions, and docket fees must be based on property value.

Specific Performance and the Obligation to Transfer Clear Title: Palon v. Brillante

In Palon v. Brillante, the Supreme Court held that a seller who receives full payment must not only deliver the land but also cause the issuance of the buyer's separate title.

Buyer’s Right to Specific Performance When a Seller Backs Out of a Contract to Sell

Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies that sellers cannot unilaterally rescind a Contract to Sell, and buyers may sue for specific performance.

Ejectment VS Specific Performance Understanding Property Rights IN Lease Agreements