CTA Case No. 3864 (Resolution)
�FhJBLtC 0 P fH Pttll.tPPiNf't ~OURf OF TAX A.P P�..\U QU�%0N C 1"'., co., r, - v rau - T C Ml ;.i l I' 1 TER. L VENU � Reap nd nt. X~- ~~- - � ~- ~~- X E OLUTlO lt ap rin; t.h 1 1 r i o lono r inta � d 1 r u1 1 � tnt� c urt � in ica e in he " tio ae Ca e A - � f11 J nu ry 6� 1 7 e rou 11 t t 11 bil1 .t.�� � t h v lre d en a tl y fc ur- Y- au n to cu ive rdar: � ,. v i io 59 in; o pr 1 ad un � t g , 3.1. 1 y .., ntr 1 n c n il" ci � 77 0 r 9, 1 ere i 0j Pr 'h io is r by � c 1 , le the 1 ion for r vie � � d w1 h ra n en h v -ent1t1 d c 0 J.- � r clo d n te in � so Cit. , Me 0 1la. J u ry 20. 19 7. ~~ R- I T ILL 1 r �1 in Ju J '7
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.