CTA Case No. 2018 (Resolution)
"I�.r� ; rP.UC OF THF. PH!LlPt>lNJ-..8 cuuRT 1>F TAX APPE .U..& QUEZON CITY 1 � =.tiLI . I LE: Irio:'\ :-~LfES , I l\ C . , C . 1.' �� CASE r o. 2018 etitioner , - versus - T~ili ~U ti aS '"' IO::.:ER GF r::TBrC i.L l l!~VENUE , �- eS _t-iO 1dent . - :x: - - - - - - - - - - - ".."..'. �R ~ S 0 L U T I 0 N For t he reason st ated t herein , and there being no ob �ec�tion on the part of res pondent , t he uE.otion l:i'or ~'iithdrawa1 Of eti tion For Heview11 fi l ed by peti- tioner on January 20 , 1970 is hereby ~ KTED . uezon City , Febr ua ry 26 , 1970 . ----;:;e_ RO residing R,~ . -,~ c� ~~ -r.s�.~L "~A~�_ t;;;Qr~ ~ 11~ .H..l1 J.\ l.J. � ? v . ,-, ~ .L 'L . L .H.J.U:. l\ ~ ssociate Jud ge Ass ciate Judge
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.