LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY VS. MARIETA A. BONDAD, in her capacity as Municipal Treasurer, and JOEL D. TINGBAOEN, in his capacity as MUNICIPAL ASSESSOR, of the Municipality of Mankayan, Benguet

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAXAPPEA LS QUEZON CITY ENBANC LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED CTA EB CASE NO. 1092 (CTA AC No. 96) MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, Present: DEL ROSARIO, el -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., B A U T IST A, \ UY, CASANOVA, FABON-VICTORINO , MARIETA A. BONDAD, in her MINDARO-GRULLA, capacity as Municipal Treasurer, COTANGCO-MANALASTAS, and and JOEL D. TINGBAOEN, in his RINGPIS-LIBAN, JJ. capacity as Municipal Assessor, of the Municipality of Mankayan, Benguet, Promulgated: Respondents. JUL 0120l5 &If / O.'-<t:?a .,.,.. . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X RESOLUTION This resolves petitioner's " MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Of the Decision dated 16 December 2014)" posted on January 28, 2015. Despite notice, respondents failed to file their comment thereon. In its motion for reconsideration, petitioner contends that the Petition was properly filed with the Regional Trial Court of Abatan, Benguet instead of the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) and the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) as the issue is not the correctness or reasonableness of the Real Property Tax (RPT) imposed, but the authority of the municipal assessor to assess RPT on petitioner's Load Haul and Dump Equipment (LHD) and Low Profile Trucks (LPT). Petitioner further alleges that it is not invoking the exemption of LHDs and LPTs from RPT. Not being a claim for tax exemption, the question is not one of fact, but of law.

RESOLUTION Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company vs. Marieta A. Bondad, in her capacity as Municipal Treasurer, and Joel D. Tingbaoen, in his capacity as Municipal Assessor ofthe Municipality of Mankayan, Benguet CTA EB NO. 1092 (CTA AC No. 96) Page 2 of3 Thus, the principle of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not apply for the issue herein is a pure question of law. After a careful evaluation of the records of the case and petitioner's arguments, as well as the applicable law and jurisprudence, the Court En Bane finds no valid and cogent reason to reconsider its Decision. To reiterate, Section 195 of the Local Government Code (LGC) provides for the procedure in protesting a local business tax assessment. In the case at bar, the pivotal issue is whether or not the Municipal Assessor has the right to impose RPT on petitioner's LHDs and LPTs. By invoking \ Section 195 of the LGC, petitioner filed a wrong mode of appeal for the denial of its Request Letter for the cancellation of tax assessment by the Municipal Assessor. Clearly, the RTC has no jurisdiction to entertain said petition as it is not an appeal from the denial of the protest on local business tax assessed by the Municipal Treasurer. WHEREFORE, premises considered, petitioner's "Motion for Reconsideration (Of the Decision dated 16 December 2014)" is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. Presiding Justice WE CONCUR: CAESA~SANOVA Associate Justice ~a-~ c_.~~04.,:J.: JUANITO C. CASTANEDA, JR. Associate Justice E~P.UY Associate Justice

RESOLUTION Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company vs. Marieta A. Bondad, in her capacity as Municipal Treasurer, and Joel D. Tingbaoen, in his capacity as Municipal Assessor ofthe Municipality of Mankayan, Benguet CTA EB NO. 1092 (CTA AC No. 96) Page 3 of3 ESPE ~ N.l\A~.G~ ~;.//.. /� ~/~ CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice <f:M. ~ ~�~� MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice