CTA Case No. 2386 (Decision)

- REPUHt.iC OF Tf:If~ PHlLIPPl~ES t30URT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY . 1' .J 3 ci ion 't 71 ., rh1ch t � t o... ~~ C 1 .c ,. ot Cu a a ~a or h 26� 1~71. 1 .o r t. i l tbis ~'?P~ l tht f't'l t th �-l u 1 tor r ~spor.CJ nt d 3Ct /

F;CIBIOfl """ro . 2,186 CT.t. CAS �J 0 th ' J 33� 9 , 91 J ... 7C~ .or 1;.; ek or suff'1c1t:lL!t etVidenc ~"- to 4 �.sti- ry i .t rorf~ turn . :n. c ner or �1� it!ltl:Ct of' the j ? rn !l on j ":'p bo l' wiC on ~i-1 - r on <.. th i d (:;c.t i on 1 not l by th ::riti ' v. Dy """'~. 1 ..,.,....,... 975 . . "'' 87

3 b , d c1 io . of b C~ll o r ct l d b pt . leto � Jos or tn u w. . ace Vultur mic� tt e d are ot . 1<:1 p ~nt sion ,. or C.u v \1 P'P 1 an r v :r or the Coll -. tor o Ct. tom in r ..~r tc tb . j .p 1ft l 1t or h 3 ro. th f 1j p ali � 1 On ri f a of c~_, to 11 s-s ; ~-� �

... 6o � 'T .) � 4 ' o P.P l 0 1 d � r rt J.. :; t )0 io�. r ~ 0 0 .~ . ;' , " 89 '

Cl c~. � .9 0

� ~ca~z 1 .. e-r, c. BE �. � 2396 6 ron o o 1... r Cu o n. ""7 , 1 f:9 1 in. clt d tn t c f th � al j,m � .t n Co.. 1 otc ot uu tM.. 1.n '9' ..~ !11. tn Go r. in t~ t h no h~ r 1 d b t. - , optVr p r �'I . $ n. v r r 1 in th&t a� ru-1 �i c,..~ rt .ad no Q�;portun1ty to JDS, upo :r o o , .n1o t � r o'l pr.~. 1 of t s upon th ' O" _ � . r .t 91