PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. BIENVENIDO M. DIMSON Couperville Mansions No. 17 East Riverside, San Francisco del Monte, Quezon City
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court of Tax Appeals QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, CTA CRIM. CASE NO. 0-339 Plaintiff, For: Violation of Sec. 255 in rei. to Sec. 253(d) and 256 of the National Revenue Tax Code of 1997 as amended bv RA 8424 -versus- Members: CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson CASANOVA, and COTANGCO-MANALASTAS, JJ . BEINVENIDO M. DIMSON , Promulgated : yo ___ __ Accused. AUG 1 Z01V X _________________________________________________________________________ f:.iC~:.!!_� X RESOLUTION For failure of Prosecutor Angel R. Purisima Ill to comply, despite notice, with the Resolution dated July 19, 2013 , requiring him to submit to this Court the records of the preliminary investigation , pursuant to Section 8 of Rule 112 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended , the above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED , without prejudice. SO ORDERED. 9-.c . ~~"Q , JUANlTO c. CASTANEDA, JR. Associate Justice CAESARk;.NOVA P-/-~/ Associate Justice AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MAVIMA GROUP, INC. and ROMEO B. VINCO, (Room 302 Medalla Building 596 EDSA, Cubao Quezon City)(CTA Case No. O-905)
- RANDY ALLIED VENTURES, INC., v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his official capacity as the City Treasurer of Davao City,(CTA Case No. AC-160)
- CTA Case No. 3828 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3828)
- LAS ISLAS FILIPINAS FOOD CORPORATION FAO & PAT-PRO OVERSEAS CO., LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 7407)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. LA FLOR DELA ISABELA, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1006)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL AB (formerly known as SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL AB)(CTA Case No. EB 1534)
- WATSONS PERSONAL CARE STORES (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9303)
- FLORENTON M. CHIN v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE/REVENUE REGION NO. 16/REVENUE DISTRICT NO. 98, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY(CTA Case No. 8989)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.