CTA Case No. 1143 (Decision)
/ m II"t.H.: 0 T E PHILIPPIN.blo OOUR'l 01< TAX APPE.t.Ul QUEZON ClTI' . � � 11 -- � .... ..
' rt . ,I .. on tttt ... i. 1 w tl ~ f � .. 18
., 0 11. .l. e - tbt'ti et!U'l. .~1 ld , ur�u:s � i':t'C!' ( .t.:.l . ) I no . ) pr. a, u a k lu r.!cl:l� 't l, � to '(');.. 0 I pc ti.t OJr. r"" .Finance. n, riods fr 3�1 , ) 1 ;_ ~~ i� 19.
I .' 1 ;E 1t p: ti . .y .' or " ci 1 (.lOVr< in d �, ?'1' � ~o r ~ t . l t 1......,9 2, t9:;~~ t:o J' ~ry 30, 1S'tSOt r 1 ""tf: 1 1 ; . t <.; 1 t *: . (.) 1 t .. .a . 1.d r t �on .. rt.1~1 � 1 6t, �; ~ 20
-~Ji':n- 1 r� 11 J r ') v' 'h- t r !'� i 0 ~ .i f t - n h ri ' 1' 5tl .~..;:� J.~r ".n l1 y 7; .r, '<'t1: or ~w ~a ., 31 , ' - :i tt +} -, �use: ' �et on I. .t . 1 tb t -.. . ct '�� aid l a .� � t. -th . , _. ri.<l r.
.. � .. 1t � � � � . ' .. ;; 22 r
�-n� .:. c i th d ... . .. ' - t1ot (,.riU"t h�'1.'1 . ! 11 ':;7,.an .~...f� 1. 0"�'~!1 ) ) . ,r� t.x ;). "...",' Ql'.lft Q tt( ..of ti lt .f~:r r ' .. 1n . d~ Ju 1 21t f ', t '1 1 ,. 1' 1 f l t Jl'lo )! .tnt ,'j, r... cr t n t:1 H ur.;t , ' 26, 61 ,..� 1 t' � r,. r1 ,.. .. d tot .r ' l"'~ q .. r r� '- f.H t ( L:l ~-ourt .... ' c ~:t \ 23
~n� ..... " (?~ *"o t ,f .) r ~ ~l~ttr: t\lf r .. ~ ;~ 2""' 4. -
(t ) .' .. : �.. c {. if 25
... \\(�. 114 re ipt ~h , ~a;y , �nt � � ot� �' th t .l ~ d ~ Cl I 19:9. , , 1.9j~ t r - 3 , 196t. , ,.. ' f. . r ; r.~ U .o 'r t: U#.l. Oov � .r m r i ;~ 26 .' ;
� t ��' 27
I. � � J ;~ 28
�1 r ..... t 1 L ' ( ) h .. r (' ' -~ 29
� ot �j6 � u 11 . I tl ll n C\L ty .,.
.. .5 r~ !ne r ' 17 ' tlac .. 168 m tr t' r .. nd ""fld t i n ~t;;, ~ L"' ll ttt tl }''., $ tv y r �f> er t l Cflm"' or� ~� ~. ~.. r ..... "" c ot ~ � s r:r
,� r . ~- h.- ��� \.. . \t-��, Lf' �, :~ 32
� was evidence 33
... .. ' � ' cause of action) . 34
41rl~J! r�~ - C.u '-At~ tl .. ., 11 4- I rt~G~,. 0' 1 t .. t J�~ on 't'l f '*"t � '.~� [ ... ... � l:t t ...L.:n to �� 1~ t'l'fi ;~ 35
... / � - ' 36
' 1 / ' - 37
.~2 tn �- t tlo:; J:~h P t 1~~ . . � .' . ." ..,. � .u.." .....d "' ::n th c-.-<' ... t ue .on r "'h 3 1 95~ .:r � l , ".' t t� ... \ .a tl"CU r;r l'te t . t�-"'' (! �t~ . . . JA;.. \. ~ ... ..,l,..... .... ~1 38
More in CTA Decisions
- CRISTETA MAY GALANG, CARIDAD ORTEGA, MILDRED VILLAREAL, RONA MARIE YNGSON, TANGLAW LUPE GUTIERREZ, AND TRINIDAD JACOB v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9081)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and PERFECTO L. ARANAS REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REGION No. 19, DAVAO CITY v. ELRIC AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION/SACRED HEART GAS STATION(CTA Case No. EB 1174)
- CTA Case No. 2346 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2346)
- MAUNSELL PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7860)
- CTA Case No. 5569 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5569)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AIG SHARED SERVICES CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) [FORMERLY: CHARTIS TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES)](CTA Case No. EB 2383)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOTAL (PHILIPPINES) CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1616)
- CTA Case No. 935 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 935)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.