CTA Case No. 1791 (Decision)
u,J"U LIC E PHILIP 11'0!.& COURT Oil' 'laX APPE.ALI ~UEZON CITY - ' . ' ..., .. - .-; . ; " t .. " 340
_} '� t i .. t ' � fo c � ,.... t io 0l r e r t t' - � co f co ct 3 41
� .' t .t ',� ..... c 342
' r :r ln p ol>l - n 343
' 1 .. ' id � ,, 34 4
� ,,. ~... _7 l, 3' 7 ,t ... o J .:o. , ,. , l t1V " . r n f ll 345
l� .. I I I t :r t r .. 0 , .r- 346 '-
' - - r ' . - t r � ' 347
9 I l �i I� 348
� � 10 . ,I / 0 ' ? 34 9
ll � � e ' ' � � ) - 350
. t � ' 351
l, �i t 1 rl1 ' t. tt /. l 0 <: �.t t: [ w <:~ ' 0 e t a, o .. - �~r .,, j~ 352
� ��' 1- p .,... os 1 o � eon , ' � 353
- a. ..t ''\ L o;tt. i-:1 . ( '"� �o � X!it ,.~r v.. . l. '1 : r ib 1/ ,. ,� :r c :.Lty c 1 t.Ht t. . ) "' ~ .,.;, . ~ 'l. ....... . d . tribllt ~J pu of rh \ ::��! ,.J., t~i" . ) L.t (..)t v . .. . ., .,,.,, t �r� ''!t �.H.iirorn .'t ,-,.; r y .~.,'~, ".' . 3& 2 �T 9l/; v. .. ' VC ' -~ ., ' .~ . l � ov '9 J./2 ll_ at ~ ' r .~ .,:~1 ... ?: ";i<::i~ r� i . tl� ... ' .l I ,., J .. t .� ' c c <:.?1.,. for � ~ �� � J Jo � ' 'l"a t n p 354
) 0 . -~4>--~1 '12-- --) ~. ,. 355
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.