CTA Case No. 1389 (Decision)

~ -� ...~ / \"I, �1 � '. 169

p ~ - , xn .> 7 - ' 1 7 0 i l i

/ t ) .. 11 171

F It 17 2

I I n a 173

� - � ' .17 4 .

1 rpo t a � � I 175

- j � 0 11 ' 1 � 0 ,, .. , 1 l .. 01 t� t 1. } �! 176

... � -t f. i ) 1 � 177

� 1 r .. ) t i t t � 1' ll XC r( � p 0 t a� tt � � � 178