CTA Case No. 1296 (Decision)
r.n pP l.l - ...... I� 451
. �, '' :.J - 1 � I~ �: �� 1 ' .. 452
~- ' '' .. - t 3 Ja '1 i -~ -�; t ~. f ~1 r b n. n '< t t -t �� . .. - Jl ) . a 1 G 1- f t .J . hJ t 1 te � ,, ' t 11 I �� �........ .. . - � � � � � � � �,� .����� .. � � . � � . �' -==---~=-~ � ( 453
D~IStOU � o. 12\)6 . C.t:A C .~. al t Qt 5� . Sonal Dir- ctor of Q t.r C. .x � 4; PI?� ]t� ~~ t ugust 231 19 2, e r,. t np. ,. S't, Dl'.t'l �~��) t ~tS� l:!l til t �%..1lun.tt1Q Qf , .. , ~rant ~~ � 6t�63t .). On 'r.I':C'!.10rrrrn fo. f r r t otne 1 por to� el d � 1 ot or � te �t o 1 t&~ottlh Cou . 1�1 an pon �.� t in :t .sw .r: nd b �,;: r isat h Vrc'i � t ct rf� e e !'l tl'd!' '� (30 ) d t , t '� oi lon�. t l' t tt itt n t . 454
.. 1 ( � s,. �~ . � �)� 1 1 (1) r h fi f- B a tl b1 ax 1 r. .,. t ' �t 1 t 1 b t llc 1 455 '
�- G 1� ' :!. ., n. � 456
- 7 , �1 0 r 1 c � 1 ,, 457
ippin~ 1 onv �t . . ct 1 ~, � ��. 1 ~bly} . u1e find 1t1on,:rft, ~~~:t fi' tt ;r� n; ,� bl~". li!' r~JT*~~ t�}et � s fr~r.~h"f r.: , by tXJ.. 'i t-r ... ,., rin C,M ,){'it Cft,J;<J:ti.tX't )\;ll.lb- Jf'~�~ .t:~ u1 ~ tt e h tH, ana .;.,\ n... tittlot'l . exr� .. .-~� ~ it. il'l 1\ot ~6)6.� t ;e do not ~- '1~v~ tna � tt~ rr :! t.: "': ehir~ hut. or� ,... �� r-t ~�"'! .lly r ~v1'it~ 1. tee t1ttn , ,._ nf t h !Jo e 1 rrancnitt.fe ttt . orth i,r.t ~f!'.ctSof' 1 of ! ~: td Act ht.~. i ~t ~iled 't:�:t th ,;lsla t b r rt i. ccr� c.r l'Atcn m!l ,.,, p r t. . into itt etuurt � 'f\-., r Qt~cn 1 thot a � tr~ tJ1te t :f ... 458
- 9 459
�9 ;I 460
... 11 � f. 461
n t �ou ... r; cA~ no. 1~9 or 'Q 1 ,. d , fl" ..n- (} 0,.. 0 , ' . . r. u � (..ol ~ct:or #4 . ..~- 8 r �- t.o., T e . � Pl tl 0'1<\.t' " 1 e., a.. 7' , ~ 1J l ... 1 c. v. I 11 etor VM,l ., � "" 7) . 3 :>11 ~ ' r je .. r t l'e ~ a 'in f' �t � 96 1�' u 41 2\ ' 1 ae n ,.. Jn o... r. 'c - i~ l' 1 not j at r "ttlE' ~ r ... ut 11 - h .� X0 ol.. ow .. . . .. .. .... . .. .. . .. . ..� . . .. r) ..... ' � � � .�.�.��� .�.�.�.��� ���.�. �. ���.�.�. �. � � ~ � � � � � � � � 0� � � � � � � � � � �� � r. 4 l:~ ') u ~'""
H' ;..~ ~ ;o. ., ' \ ��r,l / 1 f t � ,, ' t ' . e, t 1 � �� c ,�, 1� 463 . �'' .~ ' ' \ I \< .
More in CTA Decisions
- SPC REALTY CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY TREASURER OF CAINTA(CTA Case No. AC-77)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8357)
- CTA Case No. 3605 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3605)
- CTA Case No. 5563 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5563)
- MINDANAO I GEOTHERMAL PARTNERSHIP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7801)
- FRITZIE S. CHUANG/MITPLAS TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10332)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-72 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-72)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1363)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.