CTA Case No. 1224 (Decision)
t on ..t f - � v ... � � L q/1.31~~ - - - - - - .. --.. - -�.. X 0 in n i � 7, 1 0 v 0 � l io J l� � 19 2
� 12 -' ' . .. � - 247 ) fc � 0 � .. � � � - � 19 3
Ot! 1 ON � � 1224
� -- t f rom 195
� - ... 196
� � 197
�l 7- - I - 198
� l ;c ... ' ... iv v 1 �d c ,) ~ ..... ~ 1 ti ..... u�:r � ...,u ;'"'�li .~~ 1 conn�:~~c I' cf h n i.d'i l nd ~� Jy ct ,,, � T. d �Y ~- vi f 'l , f n 9 l 19 9
� n IC i 200
l O ... - 201
ll ' - l cal y roflt c~d tt o:ti .ls ho Sh l l b USAU '/ ~.t 'Vf'l't' 4lC ~t i . l a P ..f s~t! facto.t'y qu~lity ~n at~ v i l� bl& �< son bl , c . rabl prlGe 202
� 1 .. � ... a � � , n .. 1 v .�~ � � o. ... 203
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5300 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5300)
- CTA Case No. 1851 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1851)
- CAMPAIGNS AND GREY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9420)
- CTA Case No. 567 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 567)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE ASIA, PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 740)
- UNIVERSAL MALAYAN REINSURANCE CORPORATION (Formerly MALAYAN REINSURANCE CORPORATION) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 6)
- CTA Case No. 6013 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6013)
- GENIOGRAPHICS INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9712)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.