CTA Case No. 1224 (Decision)
t on ..t f - � v ... � � L q/1.31~~ - - - - - - .. --.. - -�.. X 0 in n i � 7, 1 0 v 0 � l io J l� � 19 2
� 12 -' ' . .. � - 247 ) fc � 0 � .. � � � - � 19 3
Ot! 1 ON � � 1224
� -- t f rom 195
� - ... 196
� � 197
�l 7- - I - 198
� l ;c ... ' ... iv v 1 �d c ,) ~ ..... ~ 1 ti ..... u�:r � ...,u ;'"'�li .~~ 1 conn�:~~c I' cf h n i.d'i l nd ~� Jy ct ,,, � T. d �Y ~- vi f 'l , f n 9 l 19 9
� n IC i 200
l O ... - 201
ll ' - l cal y roflt c~d tt o:ti .ls ho Sh l l b USAU '/ ~.t 'Vf'l't' 4lC ~t i . l a P ..f s~t! facto.t'y qu~lity ~n at~ v i l� bl& �< son bl , c . rabl prlGe 202
� 1 .. � ... a � � , n .. 1 v .�~ � � o. ... 203
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.