CTA Case No. OC-444 (Decision)
.:1' _ _.,._ __ .... .. .. . . . . it 'on � ) ~1""j ~~ � . t1 c�.. x �a � X� � � � - � � � � �X
1 -- 2 1 �� 1, t1 i . '1 (� � 1� j i� 4 �� - s 0 f � i ... � � � 1 �- a � d ;! 1 � f t x. t f �� tn n � 7, � � �- n. i l1 � /� 33 1 . 1
� -- s �� �� ( � � � � � � 0 t -
� � .. �1 i � 1 .o n � � f � l.l 0 I th i ' I � i � ! � � ~ h � i " :1 t i ... ..,. r t o� t ri c� on cm h a 1 � lly n ,.....,........... T i � n ill& 0 1 pot c ... l ' .� 3. 7 , 17 � 33
� -- ,1 � 334
1 - � � .J~ - 0 ( 1 �) -7 � �� � 2. � it- � le �( (- () �� 1
� -1- - 7� � � ,1 . 41 f ic 1 � l f � i c if e 0 :� 3 3 6
� - � � � .J - � c � � e (1 1- � � �� � �� 337
- � is t II - �--------�� � � f f �- t 1 l, t x. t r� � u t 27, �
More in CTA Decisions
- FIRST PHILIPPINE POWER SYSTEMS, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9067)
- PHILAM FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7765)
- MISNET EDUCATION INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9941)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NEW YORK BAY PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2748)
- MARC G. CUYCO and KEVIN G. CUYCO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-156)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8198)
- RENOIR IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10840)
- CTA Case No. 2911 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2911)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.