CTA Case No. OC-444 (Decision)
.:1' _ _.,._ __ .... .. .. . . . . it 'on � ) ~1""j ~~ � . t1 c�.. x �a � X� � � � - � � � � �X
1 -- 2 1 �� 1, t1 i . '1 (� � 1� j i� 4 �� - s 0 f � i ... � � � 1 �- a � d ;! 1 � f t x. t f �� tn n � 7, � � �- n. i l1 � /� 33 1 . 1
� -- s �� �� ( � � � � � � 0 t -
� � .. �1 i � 1 .o n � � f � l.l 0 I th i ' I � i � ! � � ~ h � i " :1 t i ... ..,. r t o� t ri c� on cm h a 1 � lly n ,.....,........... T i � n ill& 0 1 pot c ... l ' .� 3. 7 , 17 � 33
� -- ,1 � 334
1 - � � .J~ - 0 ( 1 �) -7 � �� � 2. � it- � le �( (- () �� 1
� -1- - 7� � � ,1 . 41 f ic 1 � l f � i c if e 0 :� 3 3 6
� - � � � .J - � c � � e (1 1- � � �� � �� 337
- � is t II - �--------�� � � f f �- t 1 l, t x. t r� � u t 27, �
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.