CTA Case No. 340 (Decision)
�REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS WANILA � etittonu, .'� . ,qq� - Val' � � ~) ~ - X � � � � � � � � � � � � � X I This !a d isl of esp t o lector of ~ 26. 1�956. .,.t ylD tletftU'' � cla of of 13, 654. 2 np.res tf.n9 c. ..-.Ntlft ta on ty cotton ga ...-~teet y pet t onv. foll lng f- � � � en est llshech etf.� t:!oner � � st1c corporation e119a eel in the anu� facture . dlsuf.button and sale of co stare � glut� �eel corn o 1. pon prior application. lt� a1Deas starch ... rec lz �� � new an ... ... of anufact.urln c o. t o� cr � ln ly petlt10fter was aatecl. y t f 1- ance . exe~~Ptlon. n others, fr - the follo ln "X ,X X X �2. The percent� e tax on t sa es nuf.ctured products ~�apect to lch � tion � anted, and n r ter!als and pplles to u exelu� aively 1n tbe nufacture of sue pro� CiuctSJ 670
- 2- 1 t 1on f r to tond t on � at the ly :r imported s ulp 11 a of p for ......._. tr c corn) a that ls locally aa soon as � llar or nufaet period of sal �� to r 1, ~2. � te � � r 211, �- �� tax u M ently, � e.r � � it on re eated respondent to refun t e ~""'"'t collecte . cl paid �� . lee or ~o � sat1n r ls r�~��t . . . ln a le t r, v 26, 1 56. c tton starch � � lch re avalla 1� 1 671
- ... t � f.fU lly eov r d U1 I t o.t t a 1�� the ~r t ry of nc � d t !Ul 9 . 19~3. grant in tn � pay nt of .). enue t~ � (X '� -� on race p n r 1 56, t t l Yit lt y � 7 1 ch .. n 1 7. - t r pl Th lns 0 1 let 1 � 0l ct �� - r ala jtAZlad! tlon r- t � rul.tn or the cr tary f ters rtalntn nt of pu lie ct tra 0 � ~ d 1. 672
I � ... 4 - . n h t h t 1 p 1 la (: su tatn � a fr 1 � �e l� ely t - 1 (; .. y .. J:' nt yn 2 01 nt f c � l i 1n I n n lly - id t. td nt y o t nt ' ci- ly 1 el � 67 3
- 67 4
� ~0 .. - 67 5
� - 7 ... at ls to us 1$ � o reapo �ant. y 0 ai � nt fo:r � ejo n er t tl to t � ef.. feet t at institute within two yeara ay. nt � In co ec-ti n �lt t f.a r are s ad to c na r cate clu ad n t recor s f he �e a nt � 1} tran ltte this v~ en pres art of t �s vid � uri t trtal. ts nd certifieato re re epo�lta a.d c ot tf 676
� - 8- t d as p ents o t � dates as n� n, except for t e unt of 1, 738. 39 covered by fie! 1 ece pt o. 5~111 l, ate pr!l 1 � 19~5, the re$t of t t0 Hfunded 1s arr d y the two�y r er d rescr d y the aforec ed s ct n � te nfortunate t at th � ques� � �-.. - It I clee tlon as ra sed by T spo dent � latedly, aft r �t at1o of t rece ta f ct t s � 1 ence. v r, rantin �� - enee, wef nd r y nt not well� � It s 1 t t at and cut - �� ��1 � f cates t nts volv state at � t or sales and/ c nsat n v lv � h � � so, ause lt!e of cust an roce re. c ot or u 1 cat of the ort entr on eret � ( ItO S lnlstrat ve )J , 1 57. ne , � � � o. 1 � uch a es of f al p~ in s o � \ r entr es coul eastl ve occurre very h later th pr 1 iet, � a ch �� t te r es ond nt e over nt t s o � 677
� 340 -- th r cord� of the vu~iss oner of cu~to � and th latter'� or !nate D p ties o re p ndent un er ;; c:t n 6 of t v � Cod J. p t ngs or pu l ca o ~ of th f \al 11 !dati n re fteGted., er� f 11ure o pr ent ter l evtd nc:e ns n � c si f ther t lt. p � 1 filed th ty- per o pre crt d t n 11 , ' p l � 1125. con e ntly f nd o ho c rt ct tv c d th � v nt ...tl d c n its �� � 11 n pr ceed to det r hr t � ty cott a s tn st ay c ax und r pu lie ct o. 5, r y ,. ct o. Tb statutory r nt d t x X� rovia nd r hfch pet lon e ptl n y h r t ry of . n nc r ted ' ol o � ect on 1. y per on, c ny. or eo orat1o o 678
� -l � 1f � th t � ~ ly n d ustry ~ � c� n n all rn - t tv en 1: co n of nc 0 ,. g Xt n 0 tX .. t f t0 of corn h, :r c�� f � ��� er t t or rat1 v. llect r f 679
� - 11 - aae � �c 15, 1 ~l see also h rpe v. �� Y� � 1118, 1119, 134 is. 618). In t~ ternlt rporat1 c the v�rlo"a fin!t ons of the ..,.Oft ufacture� � in- t�rpreted a d un erato n o.r ~ nary a1 lflcatt � � ot � 680
� - 12 - 1 e re pe vol � a p.roe �� ra - ~ 1 1".' � 1 � ol � lt y, uy eh 1 n a.rtlcl 1 lt~ l � et , 1 et- t1 t rp n 1- 1 f n1 ae (;� 1:>, � et � 1� 681
.. 13- n"qu � tly. � t px-epa&'e and pro ee h s a::-t lea ln t~ n {or ey % adUy. com� ly 1 in he et. � b 1 ott y ot J: eon- wnlent contatnu s in :r related to t nuf�ture of cor atazc � ld fnatrate t n fie!ttnt p of ts ~. ~and 1 t al t sta-y. lt t � a y pu on. ti � c~atle � tn n neee stry f tbe pa nt all tax � dttectly aya 1 by � ch petso � putnuahlp. co a y or c po atlon 1n res~t to said nduauy. ltb Hspttet respo. nt �s c ntent on h t ty c tt n a 1 are not ex t fr eo en� M t ey ue ot t � nt ( xhlbt't ) to �- ecntary a ca cann t limit 1. � oper ti pq llc. tl T ace cannot val! the exe t1 n ly c t�� tually on c xclu� atvely � ecessary r- er te tha t uthottty c fer ad upon a ecret'ary of f ~� under actl n 11 f � 1 1 1t t he clalsiftcatl 85 1 c�~e~~lal nnt_.� '! ve ld prt�lle f tax �� tlon �� a 682
� - 14 - ecaasa y I try ( r � orporatlon of the bll �� � llectoz of Intunal fiV � JMHf)� .rula t � packlft of cQrft starch 1� 1n re to' '� \ factUH t r it foll oa;a eation ~ � or ..lea tax. nM ently. t co.,�..t Mlea tax pai her tlonu t nal 0 o eti� (u nut . 92 repnMnt c 1�� of t.y co t ila. 63 C7/
tEPU LIC OP TRE PlULIP ~IN~ COURT OF TAX APPEALS HAND.\ Petition��� C. T�� C � X � � � � ~ � -� ~ ~ ~ � � X G lG I' I concur in the ini c 11 � t at this � rt � j risdiction is c � t n- VOl'VeS cl i .f r rafund of n intern 1 rev n t X e � ni byt C lleetor f Intem 1 n, pura to c ions n � of at on 1 n- temal venue Code. Thia ort has en conferr d exclusive ellate Juris 1ct1 to revl by � 1 eclsions f th Collector l nte al evenu in c se 1n olvin refu 1 of internal evenu t xes. ( ction 7 , � ct. � 1125. ) � c ens t ng t x sought to r funded s n int 1 rev nu t x. I ala co c r ln e op1n1 at t e er ln � �� s f11 d ithin t st t t in ection 11 of ubl ic t o. 11 � this p 1nt, I wish o o e fr jority opinl ic 1 in co l t agr e ents 684
685
- 3- iti vry 1 1 �1 atit ex s �t f tX ti der � - an �p ' as � - , f 686
� p:ric � - 4- t ti nex at have ece ~�d th c d1tions led e of this f t, t ezwlM lt sh. 4l have re- quest onald z tJ. f � icl c t1on � ot that ndin h� l!wd � ion re t t t l rtati n f ~ -.teri ls, exc t eul ur, an the y petitioner, it 1 orted, f o Jenu ry. t 1 . 9 � 2l bales .r 211.1 7 p1 c � o co~ t ga 1c � ed t t� t � ct n at rdl. Th � ' ~1� ly of rate � n n c ss ry i n t � l at s onding t x on uc 1 ort 1 � � I f, �� 1 cl b gG ar ly t 0t ga no i aon peti 1t buei- ��� su ceasfully, t � re g in viol tion of th te~ o t � gr n o x i but ��� 1ng a ific t1 t ereo � lt is cont d t t t et.axy o in nee 1 no ort t xe tr li � by new and nec..aary n � I\at 10 u t.lblic t det� ta of Finance a l� p....l' t nt and r teriala y ted of u by n and ai p ideas G87
s- � -, - 1i 1f oil tt. p :r f ry f d ll - ss fie tion c 11 v n or n rlvl of X I0 ec 1 i t � in t! � 01 r � . � ' t - ~ 68
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 3144 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3144)
- CENTRAL LUZON DRUG CORPORATION VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10045)
- CATHERINE T. LOH/ARYSTA MARKETING v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9934)
- UCPB PROPERTIES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 6723)(CTA Case No. 6677)
- INTERGEN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PHILIPPINES), LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6893)
- CTA Case No. 5782 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5782)
- CTA Case No. 3544 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3544)
- CTA Case No. 5997 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5997)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.