CTA Case No. 2262 (Decision)
.- ,., I' l t. I 11 L 1 , 1 ti c:,,,,, t � � A.� PE.\_L' Qtlh �o:� ':nv 1 '7 8
, fO l' he r l � bs in ebNaey, 1 ?1, p-et.it1cn r 1led \~."it tb ot ._.....w..,. lon~r In et"P 1 tt~,;,.,.n cl 1 f'o or e ' uly 1, 1 8 r ., u~n l, 1 69t . t no a 1 � h s '!' ot 1 s t ble a fter un 3 , 1968. Apr 1 v. 1 1n or th :fund, tl ).co. or the l f t h e !V'b"!lt'ftl�im!.lllll'n\, e 1s ore 1 � not or f1 s imp 1o�� In ct Mantl ' bl lnc. v n , c.T.A. � 63� e. ?t 1973; nd bil1pp1ne AViation Corpera ton s . Cc~S.at1on r of Int "'ll.al even , ~ C � No . 21 ;t :u � ;, l 74, t. .e 1& OlY d 1D or �tb et1tt.oner , th Cc.ur hold1 , ...,.~ _ ..,..", � s l.l 11 179
., ...... o. ? 2 3 pl1ca- 111 i t� 31 . c j h ct r � pe i h .~ 1 8 0
� ,l 3. ' 1c � � 2 , 1 7\t. � c � 0: t' 181
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.