CTA Case No. 1655 (Decision)

ll!'!'l'.,, W ()l< 'l lF Pl!ILlf'Pl~U! C:li\ R l {lf<' 1AX APPEAL~ QU b~t1 N CITY . ., � l ,. -- � z--- . ,.. .............. a, tt ot t 1t it r JuJ. 1� l. l c D c w., 3 t 1 . 2. ,r i a o � 1: ~ion c a~ httl. ti � ttU1 l to J Jul.v l )l, l r llt 1962, p titi er pvch � tto to ceve .1 oi ~o p-~1 s .11 . Q t. r \.s 1n.in d oil an t ls wns p$ y . � p. d a.rt1e e � 15, , oc eber 4 t 1}'. :� 212

... .. 1, f.ll � - 2- it � ' i !' 213

D.�Cl� u. l 55 . I pl t.U in h a C. J t 1 a~ : tn oe .3 c ent� u .0 t �.,q ' . $ io ...r � c G.J. � o � L-2*+ 21, " .u, '19 7., � � Vio t "'o� ., e. G. � .t! J t � a. st t.� � tl � s , be t ~ rr 0 � - d 111 e.,all olleete P8)'U.t & itin t. �,a :a, llU.:St t �- t l'G with r .Q attr t 0 yes p � 3C t r~� c .) ' Ho- e 'uu:� .. t~1e t t rrn u l.,y �01" i l l le 1' pr Vi. in ........ ctl e it n.

... twcr��Ior~ CTA _g; 1-it . 1G55 run r ., . ro � the n te of ~:i:f .� t bi.: t ~.r t hf> ha ni.ng ;.~ott ally tHLd 1 n its mi.ni.n~ r;. ~tl'iri tions . Con. ~;;qu~:t1tly t th 11.1 for r tU'te u:st bB t'll- ".fltb t h e C 'rmU-.t ion~ of lnt .. r l iif1V .nu �i ..in t d4?ei sicn d-riJtlr't; the claj m 10r t(!'f'urn:I , ,btt..in.na.cs.a (Gollnctor � ~ �f-'.'nC7, ''')"ti� Ui " th � - suhi f'r.. ls 1n its ;:;i.r:1ng � .;:~r<~A tic n, tr~(t lat. t of w: ich Dec . r :>1t 1':762. r: wev.er , its "' p;' a.l 'iiG:S- filr,�-,d enly n J u . 26 , 1965 ttf\r I"'or� t l<l n t �c. y �.rs from ..- f'Cc tar 31, 1962 .. Cleurlr, p~tit 1on,.:r �s rjg.ht tor .c ove.r the r.rth r is ~v . � i� 215

, 5 � l r by tU .i . ,.... to 1 1975 � \