cta_decision CTA Case No. 22582258 1974-11-21

CTA Case No. 2258 (Decision)

'" < I) I it fol 1 1 � 11 1 \ r , J�.\ 1.~ ~~ : Zil�' :11 Y ti () r-, c.r. � c � c tl I~I }::Y~ I - - - - - - ... ... .... .... I1 it1o 1 I' of 0 t , .a ' nt ri 1 1 r t. 1 r1 i .0 o. 0 221 9 . 15 196 � c h r 0 r ?, 1 J ' 1� t r, o , r 197 1, 0 18, r 297

,... 2 lt,. 'fh.at n ree ivf)d ~al.~ 1 t r of r fUnd a !3.mttt by h in par . 1 or hi a an w r d �t d. June 11, 197' to th 1nst �1t f t! t:to. ; s.. Ti P~tJ tion .r has t .r- e tv_ ny r ply o his :r turA t~qu at from R�..... spa, d .~t t ~11 1 "dmittEK\ by hi~ 1n r . or hi . An r t~d J n 11 � 19?1 to �th in$t.an f' t~. tion; 6 . Th h. 1 1:.~ti t1on � s t11$'1 on A.pr t 1 3t 1971 tt11 thin t ht? r �, gl~~ntar-:r ~ ri.C'..d f'i :x by WJ pu lie .Ae �<> � 5 1 p~11 to p t t!on r rr"ot1v� July 1, 1968. 1 t o"l~l' claim tl'...a t 1 a -.Xi ...pt!on troo. ta - t1on :tblic . et ' � ~� .31. � i t . .X ... .. �j w of ~- Q ton 1 � o� pn'bl.lc Aet 1c ., S't31 .ioh p-l'ovi,le.. th.at th provi. ton ot &n!d not "CJ~ 11 apply 1n e f r t 298

.. . �.... n 0t R1 ' of CanJ l1n -llC . l v. r . �"t 197 ) th t CT c � 2 1t 0 � 1 in o. � �� I:. I'll t e e r 1, 1 6 t h � ,' , hr p 1on r � 72 ' l 1 tor u 1 th� R. lie c � ' ion � t� u0 r t r� 0 , tt-1 � A hi 299

... eD ClSlON ... n;a ~ CAStt' gqc. u ly p 18 by th � ~ tt~r � d r~ ei no,y 1neem ~ t � f'o:r 1968. tlo eo~;t.. . S0 Oft!) R'r.'D .. on Cit !' , t'1ovtJeb~r 21 � 19?1t. ~~~~ RC~' H .,,. � ID~AL1 Pttesidtng Ju~g � COACt. = �>KI~~/e.~~ A soe1at uc; ~ 11--- ~-~- 300

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.