CTA Case No. 1773 (Decision)
REPURf.TC OF THE PHILJPPl:-1'> ~ COURT OF TAX APPEALd QUEZON CITY 'c l 1 17, 1 t c 1 r f t o- 1 1, c� e t ., ( :>) � t t i { 1 t. f an- rr
,� � 177 r - , on o a ve 0 ne is � fr eh..... ~u ct nd h o. r . 22, (.1 '� .n ~ 2 ' 195 ' cf c ~~ 28 1
' I t�'!t;ClSION - c1 c� ~ � 17?3 5~ 1 t pf'_rtod f l' om 1 January 1956 (tti i Or?f hu .. ' 'tJi� (b} F r th p rioi! �rr 2. .Anr 1 19$8 to 19 Junfl 1 .� 59 , h~n � p tit1one.r '\.iSS opera... t i n... 11 thout a rr~n�h s , i t,ras ubj~ct to 3 . tax impos d ~r s c ion 191 of h T~ <:C'.d �; � nd (e) F p~ri fro 20 Ju .t~ 1959 to ~ J~pt~ � 1 ~60, it ~~s s� � J c to th@ '5, tranel'l!se tax 1n &oeordan wit rul:tn~ of h u . r ourt in th C ca - . etrie d _c Pl nt Co., e . (G. � ~o . L- SZ57 , t eto'"Ar 17J 1~56) ~n' .~i~ay 11'l'ctr1o Co , ..J . .. ~.. . (G ._ ,., . tt-O � t - 10G9 a 101rc , AUf.U�t 30, 195?) . ot s tisfi d \'11 tll the rt!duet on v titJ.o~ r , on l d to hi . ~o�1rt . 1'he i su .P')S d to thi .... Co n�t ror resolt.~ t1 � n re s follow r 1 . � c th _r o.r 10 t :.. igh o � -r 0 collect fro. tf. pEl!t.l Joof!r the S\lm of 88 , '+ltJ .�?2 as . ici ncy fr nc1ise a ~1 p r .ntt. � t x !': e .... orl.r , t l i~ 28 2
t .CISlO .. ~ 'l' CA.S NfJ. 17'1 p io rc u J y 1 1 l :1 .0 m r <., 1960 ; tl t' l t r t . Pt>tc. d �rorr: ,(', 1:! d of' 'a:r. A . 'l .X c 6C; "" d ii . ony� r I!! .;1.1 .1. '-ir r ilu � to y tb to. r i . til . t1 1 .. 1 nt to collo th f th cr.:o.r ano ''th tion hOt.� � t. t � b count th - la � r ::;::, tat thA t tnnc or 'h y( tor 0 .,..ntc.:"r. 1 v n , 6 o~.~CR ic cy � n ~ -r c. 11 r r ~o '('1Ct 0 a !' '11-::� r ci h octr ~ t ? 28 3
D :>Cl"I"i~ - cw~ C.A N.) 1773 ., p~ 1 si� X!) '1 r to h c t'"' of j' A ~p~Hl.iJ.S 1 t th tla. �n aott<Jn fO"" collP- eti on k� tb ,ove�rn- nt 1 c th concom1 an of h a p 1 ( "'oll ctor \l'. Ho el Land 1.i .rarlSJ..~or otivtlt 1 07 Phl l. . � v . Co r of r to coll et t h ~ .t:t oJency x ln t.i. 1 n . n Jun.,f , ., }. .6 ..>.:nc peri od Cl:' ooll ctio s tlt'd .;. to rlm only Ot ..#. ' t;l )�:":I 1966 wncn lQ po.nd~~ r vi nd h $ pre vic nc. .. :(:""'ln!'l r .dvc' n�, .t to Hl"l , ti+) . 72 . I. Su ha . fonr .on~h � o.ndcn t nu. ry f.h .� r tt 't <J il 21 , 1_, 5 t c Jun 1' , 19 ;9 ;hilv 'P t�l io~N' 'H.itbtH.:~ :..'i frcnchi.:;('!. 'ltl 1oh cxrllt'4l!ri o ��nJ.":fl 22 ~ 195 ; l 't i n~ill f.r . chi , to 1st:> ot mind c .,J et, ~, c sa tr tter '� f'aot r ""+:i- . .,.....'.. e rr iloweVt!l'* f : ti tlor; ,l" r ls S th rl t .i113 of' It el~l...l U t r .. ond nt i usin.. th afor...-satc. ra . 'bt;.n::~nHL o � pi'1.or jtld�' .nt r nd ~r d on r~ e o . r 3, 1 ~,). by th d ~f.u.no I.oor d of
pr�cislc; - ct:� c".'"' � nc. 1'1'73 6 T. x t\"' p l.s .. n c1 e - Jt tL .ttl BEl Cl( jm or R .fr.n c� r p -!d F'r t . l'd~ ... ~ .. nco ... ( '". l~ct.r i tor}'Jo at 1on , Ta,:g l)peol 1 .. 16C, h�. .r�~i n tn Boord h~ld t.~nt ttnJ e:r its .iitlniei r rr� l. c 1'1Clr11 cr Jl ~.r 1 17, t $ t:?3 .tit 1 [J11' is only 11abl r , 1'; :'ra o,..h.t se 'Sl... ft~r t .G fi .r!t 2 " y. a ~ 0 "" f o !}fl( .:.~ r . 1 15 1 . r ::. . I r ,. its ~ j 0 t is [' =~ e""t i t 1 �.;cl.L to IH"l th t l ,_ t 1.1 y ' \ (J . J ')0 i.nvolv d ttlJ:e-s f or th. 2nc quart .!' of' 1'; 51 to the th.i.rd qu~~ t r: I J J')n �i y , f id r ") c 196 1~111 s o. 100 fo . a i !r 1 ,., """ a;Yns f<~I� ...d ",, r 1r '! tc; ' 0 ror' -""'-''' s ~ o . 160 1 :\' 1�..-: t l t ....uri ci r. � 1 .1. ' milli s t i:.'I,.A of t 'fl t 1tion... r �~d. l t .�- ... r nch i s �r~: c t r.. tl t.ior f:l ob �. n ' t "" � o- '"' r ... . J ... u .. r !'>\,; J. ~� . 4 '.1 o~"'~ �.t.. .,....,. , .. . ....~., � 1' 28 5
D CJ 'l.U ... 7 r ... y '.tA C ~r: ~t . 177 .7 l r ,c 0 l , ' � �� Q � 1. In � .o, 15 Co . � D 1r rb t0 � � I !� 28 6
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 2893 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2893)
- MS. FATIMA L. SIMBRE v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR), BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11112)
- CTA Case No. 2156 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2156)
- CTA Case No. 6509 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6509)
- CTA Case No. 2527 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2527)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS PHILIPPINES CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 296)
- CTA Case No. 836 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 836)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MONTALBAN METHANE POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2170)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.