CTA Case No. 1245 (Decision)
.,, . ' u , � E PBILIPl" .["(t!J) COlJR'l' OF TAX APPE.A.LI QUEWN CITY r, . � , . ~ �d:~nt . � ~J - - - - M ~~ - 'd1 � .... � . . .. ��� .. fir � �� I . .. if. 317 .. ~
.t Jr , c . .'":W eu.r�.fi ~ 3:; t.e .1:(rr er:>t:h. 1 .. . .. . . . . ... ~ ; ~ ., 1 n f 318
.- . t . t,::-r .r ... �� f':: .' t'. 319
� e � A \'t � � ;:; ~.~ ; '39u, 9Jl..� 0 1 19.1 l t 320 .'
) . �� � � ... . � � � � � � .� � � �� �� � � " �� �� � (~ ��� � � � � . If . �� � � � � �� � � ��� � �� � .. t ' 321
t- - _, . . 2 H ', 1 c ) <i t 1 322
' 1 , .... � � 323
~. 1.., 32 Ll .'
..,....,., .. ....... � t t t. ... s v.ere fals e . 325
... ,. - -. '. �r ,~hs o.n; ~e � � ~ - t n "-;s . {,;r c (': ) J:V. ., �.:c, bu: . t;� ..1.. 1 t1 .. .i QJ:" ~tc- �-n::~"' :tot. . .t t. t �!" '1 r "�". "... t . t~t <f .i or. r �� .._-fj l �l Co , ny . - 1. 326
1 , .. . -.... . . Jl. 1 ~'s are ) 't 327
1 i 1I � t 328
s ;.;'& r .�u tiortn ni't tl�, � 5 un :. o , .,..,1 r it;.;, ? t 15,���6, nu 1 r..._u ;:.1 ~~. 1t~ '!1 tiorl et _, ~' � h h.at la .. 1- d._ . lin 329
� ... l � l � ..d. / 'J.'.e!' o: f. '. nal Revenue Dode _& � ' 11 ' ~'1. � 330 I ' 'I
- � � � .. .) j � , ... 331
'� "'1t ! l' .- .... ... .... ... � . .. .. .- � �� �� r~ 1f :.v ... 332 I
: .(.;, ~!~f''� ... "} .. l ;:--t 5- � 7 � r �-"t'1 , . 1c.. ,ry1 ~� � .,� � 333
More in CTA Decisions
- PROVICIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAGAYAN REP. BY HONORABLE GOVERNOR ALVARO T. ANTONIO AND EMILIA L. IRINGAN, IN HER CAPACITY AS PROVINCIAL TREASURER v. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (SMART)(CTA Case No. EB 1137)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. RURAL BANK OF BACNOTAN (LA UNION), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2436)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2949)
- CTA Case No. 5188 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5188)
- CTA Case No. 1699 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1699)
- ZUELLIG PHARMA ASIA PACIFIC LTD. PHILS. ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9025)
- IFC CAPITALIZATION (EQUITY) FUND, LP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9148)
- CTA Case No. 4267 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4267)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.