CTA Case No. 1127 (Decision)
UEZ P TLI 'PINES A~PEAL CITY � 11 7 t � r u� t 1 18 �' 27 0
- � 11 7 X ' 271
- � 11 7 f of Cu t �1 rr Co 1 on r Co 0 l 1 ly of b tt e1 0 co rc t 0 r 00 h 0 , th th h 0 1' rc 1 t1 rb �i r in h ti 1 0 p io r v J1 ul y ll 27 2
o. 11 7 oll 0 u 0 or t lo. 0 r1 n� lJ li t 10 f 1- � p w 1 1 r 111 1 t i ' h l c nr i oi l of rh �n n- 1 0 h ' rs� d t- i ' Pr 1 ly u ' 0 � t ., - in t 0 I t e tu - o1 �� l � 0 net uld t tl 0 the ,I 2'73
DECI ION - CTA C SE iO . 1 127 5 bul n. � g in th r port of th th r Bur u how that in the v ning of rch 24, 1959, th w th r ov r th Turtl Isl nd an vicinity wa r ir with th wind fro 3 to 5 knot nd th ooth to light . ( Of cour � p ti ion r con id r it n rror n th p rt of r pond nt Commis ion r of C to to 1 to con 1 r tion b c u th during th proc din b for hi � sion r of Cu t ' ting dmini trati ly in r vi of th Coll ctor ' d ci ion, 1 ith r bound by th t chnic 1 rul of videnc (Philippin Shipown r ' o. v � The Public Utility Co 1 ion, 51 Phil� 957; ao � Jur . 36- 37) , nor co tr 1ned by t ehnie 1 rul to th dmis ibility of proof (Inter tat Commere Commis ion vs . B ird ~ 1 9~ U. S. 25; 48 L. d . 860) nd 1 fr to f hion hi o n rul nd proe dur nd to pur u m thods of inquiry c p bl of p rmittin him to di char hi ultitudi ou duti s (F d r 1 Co 1c tion Co i ion v � Pott vil Bro d ting Co ., 309 u.s. 134; 84 L. d. 656) . Then gain , it m signifie nt th t p tition r ubmitt d th ir c on the b of th proce ding before th Collect- or of Cu tom of Jolo and th Commi sioner of Cus tom h n th y could h v nt r d trial inst d nd pr sent d th ir obj ction to Cour or pr nt d vid nc to r but am � Under th s ~~ 27 4
cDC - ~o . 11 21 c �' i 0 v1 no g 1. � a tt 'h t 1 ' th f.1 c1 ly 1 r s on. t' th t. on h t r or Ilot t ' 5 .o h 60 n 1 62 Y' n 0 th ot 0 ro � l 1 t c tr 1 o. 1 t d ,r l c ul r 7, nd rl 1cl �0 h 1. ol � 7, 9) , u ch r 0 d ot h v th ff the expo 0 of coin or not 0 r th 0 n v 1 h :) t t 0 0 t d 11 lly 11 th c ul .J till in or il 2 7 5
- �1 7 � f ' 0 1 0 � zc' , ;. 1 � ,. 27 6
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.