CTA Case No. 4002 (Resolution)
QJ't.JaUC. 0~ � H� ,-t41LIPPINM ~OU T OF TAX ~rPLAU QtJ o" a" ..r Tf:. J � l- LT.,) , I~.c ., I et it iun r , oU - CLt 1 LF l JT J. L x----- - n nt � -- - X OJ r_t ., ~L s or id ring that J t Y� n 1 I � c r c 1 h no ith r n hib ... co n 1 for h r in � p ition r h t d it roper not �. c f tl ch ul d f h ring of i-.. c Or"lj July 31 , 9e7 ( P� ll :>. C�T�I � r C�) coun 1 ~... tit i..... er '1 d to t:lr, and th ncy o u :;) c -' il v r ' 05 , tl (, urt, ur o 1 I (J ion (.,� r ~ nt i op n cot,rt , re olv d to u !:;. ov ntitl c for ron- nd 1 ck I{ t on th p rt of 1 r to 0 cu i 1L 1� J � n it ' tro r i l 7. 19 7 .
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.