CTA Case No. 4502 (Resolution)
� 0 }{~PUBLIC 'HE PHl.J.l P i!. '0 m < ' 1' P t:Al.S Qm~ZUH C I '1'Y \o' ) I I: I. .( ..; J c , 1 ('. { HH�� t i L 1 11 t , C.'J'.A. 'AS�: tW. 'O X� - ... R E 0 l. 1 1 N u 1 ! ':13 1 nt IOV 0 y) lt: on 0 'o J I 8, :1 n h .v n t d y y X 0 n y i ' 1 88 19 r 16 :L X ill (Jot1 011 J:O k ''l' H o 07 90
RESO U ION - C.T.A. CAS~ NO. 4502 - 2- 108J Emphasi~ supplied) he eby rendering said decision oot and acade ~c. The re ccion ot this Court upon knowing that the petitioner had air c;tdy b en paid lon<J ber:ore the c se was decided, without comlunction on the part o the parties concerned in not intorming it about such developtent, is one of utter d~sbeliet . W coul never i agine that both counsel ot the p titioner and the respondent, supposedly responsible o fi er of the Court, and uut.y bound to uphold its integrlcy and digni y r the very same princip ls wh o would make futile nd e nin less this Court s proceedings. The ourt notes, with regret, tlat had the respective counsel f it tul y com l1 e with their sworn duty o de 1 with court with truth and c ndor and pro t!y nifested to this court said develop1ent (when the etitione received refund check on February 16, 1 have made the principal issue at bar moo and cademic, this case would thet have been dis~osed of dlfte enLly nd the time needed by it in the pro pt dispo it! n of meritorious cases eed not have been di sipated. Such attitude o � both counsel de erve cen ure, wasting a it does, the ti e ot this Court o ttend to more important matter I , t.herefore, 909
� REHOLUTIO.M - C . ~ A. CA~M NO . 4502 l i B nec.:&E.~IL t. �r>� QlSt:j y ac j Olt � 'l'JJE~ couuf.el 10 s. v~ t.i 011ei, A tys. luy A SUIII:>t on s .u t.i t ud G"'O!' ,, LaVctd ~ n t.IJ e counsel I OL t.Je 0 n , At:ty. to G. 'l'e 1 J.OI I [ theJ.eby HiON 'Ht' D t ) t h i t co d ICt unhe~orn1n tf' 01 t e 01 til s 'OUl t. L 01 01: th 6 me :tC '\ i l be cl a t witl 4v r 1 y. WUEREEOitE, Ill v \I o t I.e tal.! th d:: th p l~ L <.>n l d It Dll t Q 0 "0111) mtse m 1\ I'll h h lb t 1.tho kn o~fl d ot IU 'ou r "lh ch nd ], h �i s on ot Ju y 8. i ot nd cdm " b lJ s ~� j 1 1011 th it. '!./ po:r:t1on h j; ''h. n 'W 1� m l'l nd t .e udn u n 'tty, H Hnlt, c bt: , 1 t, u Pr idiu Ju .e � G UBA Associ t~e J ud�. e 910
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10588)
- HYDRO-PIPES (PHILS.), INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6530)
- CTA Case No. 3730 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3730)
- BUKIDNON II ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (BUSECO) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11142)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10263)
- JT INTERNATIONAL (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. SCA-0023)
- CTA Case No. 3049 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3049)
- FOUNDEVER PHILIPPINES CORPORATION (formerly SITEL PHILIPPINES CORPORATION) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2710)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.