cta_resolution CTA Case No. 45024502 1993-10-28

CTA Case No. 4502 (Resolution)

� 0 }{~PUBLIC 'HE PHl.J.l P i!. '0 m < ' 1' P t:Al.S Qm~ZUH C I '1'Y \o' ) I I: I. .( ..; J c , 1 ('. { HH�� t i L 1 11 t , C.'J'.A. 'AS�: tW. 'O X� - ... R E 0 l. 1 1 N u 1 ! ':13 1 nt IOV 0 y) lt: on 0 'o J I 8, :1 n h .v n t d y y X 0 n y i ' 1 88 19 r 16 :L X ill (Jot1 011 J:O k ''l' H o 07 90

RESO U ION - C.T.A. CAS~ NO. 4502 - 2- 108J Emphasi~ supplied) he eby rendering said decision oot and acade ~c. The re ccion ot this Court upon knowing that the petitioner had air c;tdy b en paid lon<J ber:ore the c se was decided, without comlunction on the part o the parties concerned in not intorming it about such developtent, is one of utter d~sbeliet . W coul never i agine that both counsel ot the p titioner and the respondent, supposedly responsible o fi er of the Court, and uut.y bound to uphold its integrlcy and digni y r the very same princip ls wh o would make futile nd e nin less this Court s proceedings. The ourt notes, with regret, tlat had the respective counsel f it tul y com l1 e with their sworn duty o de 1 with court with truth and c ndor and pro t!y nifested to this court said develop1ent (when the etitione received refund check on February 16, 1 have made the principal issue at bar moo and cademic, this case would thet have been dis~osed of dlfte enLly nd the time needed by it in the pro pt dispo it! n of meritorious cases eed not have been di sipated. Such attitude o � both counsel de erve cen ure, wasting a it does, the ti e ot this Court o ttend to more important matter I , t.herefore, 909

� REHOLUTIO.M - C . ~ A. CA~M NO . 4502 l i B nec.:&E.~IL t. �r>� QlSt:j y ac j Olt � 'l'JJE~ couuf.el 10 s. v~ t.i 011ei, A tys. luy A SUIII:>t on s .u t.i t ud G"'O!' ,, LaVctd ~ n t.IJ e counsel I OL t.Je 0 n , At:ty. to G. 'l'e 1 J.OI I [ theJ.eby HiON 'Ht' D t ) t h i t co d ICt unhe~orn1n tf' 01 t e 01 til s 'OUl t. L 01 01: th 6 me :tC '\ i l be cl a t witl 4v r 1 y. WUEREEOitE, Ill v \I o t I.e tal.! th d:: th p l~ L <.>n l d It Dll t Q 0 "0111) mtse m 1\ I'll h h lb t 1.tho kn o~fl d ot IU 'ou r "lh ch nd ], h �i s on ot Ju y 8. i ot nd cdm " b lJ s ~� j 1 1011 th it. '!./ po:r:t1on h j; ''h. n 'W 1� m l'l nd t .e udn u n 'tty, H Hnlt, c bt: , 1 t, u Pr idiu Ju .e � G UBA Associ t~e J ud�. e 910

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.