CTA Case No. 566 (Decision)
U.6LIC 0 u0 - C. T. A. NER - - ... cl I 0 p n - tt t 9 7, ti of th s � n "' � 11 r t t i n X 11 ) --- ll..,. -------............ _.__ ...-_ ... __ x. n cn n �0 i � t ubj ct i fix d d p - 133
� h- c� ~ il ml f - - ' �
� .. -
- � - .. 136 J
� - ) rr t - d c y � it th ns n ft ci c� ured 1- in ne h �� � t .. � h �� t' 1 1 u al n �u al n, --- -- -- 13 7
� -- � � r n y n n � � 1- � t e bl � l 1 l c .- � ) i � � ). In ( 11 - t ti X c n �f e - n l r � nf n nly � � -.. 1 8 t f ci y i te 1 hn 13 8
� -7 ntl. � t t nt 1 ll d 1 1 t:t .. c' s - j � � . .. � 1~ { � 139
� 66 y, it c 1 1 le 0 f d nd yc l ( )( ){a) J" c n nc nc h y � � nila � 5, 9 l. !40
More in CTA Decisions
- LOADSTAR SHIPPING CO. INC., represented herein by TEODORO G. BERNARDINO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9902)
- AB CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5798)
- CTA Case No. 509 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 509)
- CTA Case No. 4465 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4465)
- EXPEDITORS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. HON. KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES ? IN HER CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9257)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2453)
- CTA Case No. 5953 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5953)
- ORICA PHILIPPINES INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9974)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.