CTA Case No. 509 (Decision)
ltti:PUBLI t. OP -r 1� PHlLl.t'.PlN.D COUR� ul APPEALS ~ANU..A 1 -f ... .,. . .,. X i. � j, ,~ t �� � t t :' J c f"t.t tt . ... :rct (;X''" ll'd u~ 'V~ n, ' " -~ ~: ; r. .;l t H't tH 11ft Ll i i
� . .~ 9')' ,� i::. � I t t ' t I I �J .C l � ' .. i t f Y. t � ;' 1112
_,t ) .I (.' I I I ~ ~:i l y:.... .,. :l ~ ...� .l / ~ + '!I ' , . ..,.'to'�.;> ,I� \ _ftt% �~~ r:~ ~ 413
..,... . -4 ' ��oll f .n n� �� 414
r~:r!~z r5ri:"'r. �-.( =-- . ;.r .c. fi f 415 j
.. -- ( �,� � ..� t / ., ... ... 416
- 1 ,... "'e S: � l Y f Jf t. (d t ~;;,._,{.l "',. '� .Je, .,;_. , (�. ,f ..1-,�1�I (:' t � �. , . !'H .t cf ~t~ 0 inion ~n~t <� It �~; �? ~) p%'-!f ' 417 4l(
, - � 418
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.