CTA Case No. 1429 (Decision)
___.... --� !!:l"UBLIC OJ' THE PHILIP.PlNhtl COURT OF TAX APPEA.LI QUEZON CITY T ., I .. ., .:. ,.. l. '.;. .) � .. .' 280
.. - .' .: . � ., .. ... � � t. t � . � . 1- 281
I �- �� ' ,, ,.. ... t .' .' y 282 t
.' . :" - �t 283
r � �� 284
... � . ' ... \ � 285
/. .I 'I !"'".~. 1.42�) � 286 /
~ .Q� '� �� lt (1 1 � ;: 287
-a, Cl IfJJ ..c ~T;~ CA:-� . �~ '1{ � l { � t.tt, one;. a t ... t. ��� - p;p ., ol) �� Eve. �J -~.."""""- �f � pall . (t. � � Jo!.nt V�1 twn�� t .t! t v lirJ to l.epo.&n a 4 O.l�ereuJ.t , h~ Ill� eu e ther ot. � e~1 "a l #' . � ln a J 1nt '�~Jil.li!J';"u�~ �-v- t 1; i..; not .t . � ~ - et>r. -t.l.:ttft � c J .~~t,.edv~~-~ ......t the p. t.l. . tllttst eo..,. .L"'!~ t.rt~ir .tlrvp~,rt.i"1 lliO'fktl,J t Sfi:P�A:!th or k1 ~~9~ r. e 'lltt ct>;~w1 n an:det'takin~ .fll (30 _m. �J\AJrio ~~ tZ � tU'l . wb� Qb, .n~ par y 1 t;o . t&tl.l.ttl1 h a a 0 01: "" 111 ans , l � 9 zict� . -296; l 02 r~ ,., ~ . 7!J3 ;. lto .,, J.; .- lu59 . )� 4 u t: t a ...nt 1! 1 1 : tJ~o p~ll'&'ti r~ � or .nk:,J.e' . i t ." 'd 288
.,. 0 .~.t { "" t ., 0 �� 289
l .., ~. c tin; 290
-- 291 I.
-- � , l '� 3 .. T~~a~urer of Associate~. The said two documents ,, 292
.;. t' . . ... .,. ... "' ,,, )\ 1,�_. ,, J� .. Q ' "" f.u r. - ( i ti- 1 �~ 293 / \ I
- .� � � ... ,..,� ' � \. for r
,_ It .. t'":., .... tio,rm d. 0"' &' u) �' (; 1 ~(!~ 1~ . ..tr4~ 'i ~ '. 1;. .., . I .- ~"'; ~�-� c -M "'l"C' ( .1~. "' (~,;) ~"'t ( .... � ' ..., .�,_{_ .. 295
) ... .4 � '>!:.') 17 1 .. r:O! // ,_ ro .. �t~ t '-hi. t 296
t'l . c rv:d i � �,.. i - I 297
- � � ' .. ' ' 298
i t�. t '' . �� � :~ :'o in �� . �~ '
h J'l. .t tr t C< of o.l it on r r .U1 . v 1~ r t ' tic � :~cj g .,. � t . u� .\ . ,� .. .,; fl � 300 �
J.2:t . t. .LU ' .I . �1 ., � .I..;., .. J. .. -"'" . !......... ,i. � ( ~' .. ... "� -. ... .. 301
l. lil c:t 11ay fro fi l ..LU ~}Q t 'J 'U ... -er�� .... .. tn, c .u.. l";o<' fi: 1 to p �cri j( � (.,ou b ).~�...l.. .iJ., h e ,..t ~ r,.. � � '.Ci q t 4!1 ~ -ltZ__ ' �- 302
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5910 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5910)
- MOOG CONTROLS CORPORATION - PHILIPPINE BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1809)
- ACCENTURE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 477)
- CTA Case No. 1037 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1037)
- MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION(formerly;Southern Energy Asia-Pacific Operations (Phils.), Inc V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 40)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ENJAY HOTELS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1498)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7290)
- CTA Case No. 5195 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5195)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.