CTA Case No. 1037 (Decision)
106
., � 1037 ' 0 1 v .r C� I � he ' � 7- 2 ' c t ' I� 107
. G. IO - � 10 7 �T � 3 . ). t0 1 ci o~ t .c .... ,. n1 � ~. 1 - {) � 1'. 57 ( l � �1 11 l �J� t ti t 108
. Dc.EOlS�IO �. - o. ' 37 a b nd xe ut d by tb pet1t1on .1" 1n avor ot P. "'� fl "lllnery Co . , Ino., 1a ati 1 l.o . 1 n 3 (d) (2) o� 1 � atiQnul Internal l enue de, fo.r the pu.rrp s ot oput1 b n 1nc _ oJ: tlle p t1 tion r for he: sa , y a,.r � . o 1on 30{ ) (2) f t t1onal. 1nt .r n 1 R :v nu Co . provide t llo ��� ot tr equ1 it efor lo or :n b ""on 4;1er d nd llo\J' as a et on 0 ,!!'J t~ 0 1 eo put1ng th 1s ~h t ~aid lo or <lama 1. n ot for by 1nS,l1' nc o oth r :l 1 te and a.ppli d by th. upr Ct~2.rt or b in UJ" nc ott thettw . 11 ho 1 b eo st _to t1on du unde titl , r lo ous or i:mil to insurane � Inas uob as � th latter is con ract ~stabll h r � l _ al 109
" IeJxECIcSIOs � a. 1037 ; o li ~ tin , it f'oll"' t in o d � to ~ d � comp n � te � for � ., � th r .i e u, J e lo 1.1 tt~1n d '3' a tax4 yer must cov r~d. b u h di- c:i lly nfor able ri~'ht, ri g1ng fro ar.y th ur1d1 o 1 sourc ll ation , r ...ru C Un31 ng ~or1s 1 ln" . i!h o r of Tax. p , 1 , G. R. o. L- 6296, ~1ept. 29, 1956) � I h case at b .r , the 1 su ~.., t~ 1 C' by th co.mp t d for ( insur n or) 0 t4r no n f* ct "cJd no 6 due io nd in lB.' suffe d ir:r lo houl llowad. ~or partie 1 rly, t � l l ged d�dU tibl lo $ wa 00 by a judi ially e.n:tcrc ... abl r ht b d on ont c - an i ll ~ 1 t. . re - ent "n d by C .nsta o o Cu rvo to or o n r. A matt.r of f c , th pet1t1oneJ:? h already oured. f vor 1 � judg1nc t ,.a1n Const.anoio n os d o :1 1 n' xec ory. t 1.... tru-..: th t t l r i no r �o~ bl �ro� nd � to Xf' .l,.. reimbu:rsec nt from Co.t s t . l r Jos for �he omnw t. "a:!d to P. L. G lang 1 cl1n ry co., Inc . p, t1t o r r 1� .rid 1 f..ur ty + I n- r~nc. c . , Inc ___ me 1 L____Ve or at 1 �- t o r d it� los by vl 110
v� iJ "Cit 0:1 - c� ~ ASE N , 1037 6 -aft \.Jh Gn ' .� de b t 1 ' Cf" dur --sta ma � ..i r�i, h.t to zain t th h ar1n � d n ss H. 0 ' 1f g 1 f'r ~'! . n t.itton ::: Pl 1 el 'u ~t-Y I ur nc . i'' Co� t aa . , a idt t c b titio r t t it shc ul i:.,O r.: �r .tr. C rvo b c use h um�d l:;i joo\nt and -vo.ral \.l n ill "'"" d: e If i l l do t�~m. 1~� J t.s ..rt .. � 1' e fact t ~~ r! f~ t t!.one has f.'lil d tl!? to th pr ... s n to r ver y ;\l!l en i � only t red c 1 ... () c fro on F. c ervo du to bt'~sin s (}!' p -r- 0 .;. moti , ,-r, t or b -us � or 1 n �.r.. a of h is causo fo.t� the den_;iil or th right to ..h ,, io.n c r rt ns, .., of :� a ,r~l I'l a T~ ion, lfol Ch-:tptcr 28 , .. 1 ) . ' \.JHERE-FO ill !1ew of the or ... 1-n e~noi r- ~ ' a io pe ition � a1 r .! ~ !nsurano Co. 1 c �. h re.by ord d 'to th r s:pond nt or Co 1 ion r Int rn 1 V r nu th O'Utl 0 ,, 111
.,/, D CISI H ... c c �s D. 1 7 7 .oo 1 le oy 1 00 0 th� y r 1957 t t - t})i:r ( 0) ~ay f 0 h d t t.h c'isio n l. If th L nt'l p- 1Cl t h . bOV$t ~h r shall e coll 0 � e--d-:----- !" ~ e>f ' ~ ot th t:1n 1d, 1 1 t r t t h :r C~nth f r , of , a e ot p �e pr h t y he a tlaoted s 1r ter . t ll not onnt aorr �po di:o to rio of t' � (~) ~ .. r h f i ' , . h1 i pinr. , 112
More in CTA Decisions
- MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION(formerly;Southern Energy Asia-Pacific Operations (Phils.), Inc V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 40)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ENJAY HOTELS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1498)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7290)
- CTA Case No. 5195 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5195)
- CTA Case No. 5110 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5110)
- PHILEX MINING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7720)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. METRO RAIL TRANSIT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2862)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FIRST FAR EAST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2354)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.