CTA Case No. 2548 (Decision)
� f'!hPFHI,JC OF THE PHILIPPINES Cot HT OF T \.,. APPEALS OUEZO'-' CITY ., r - .I . � � " 2 .J .. /3--0 ( ~ .. 1J ' t i 19 i �' 220
� 2 i4 ... ... 1 ' 5 c , � lbs ,. 1 r � ... � ,, 221
."r".'.r) . _', ... 3 �- tr~ . ~:vc f11k1 ..,n. .ul1 1t:pt? ,E\d U'!JD11 the IIOS5U1 11 17, . J ev~ .!.. .. "&r nlll ' COUl el J.l or ~ th:. ..,6 b :l ..""'; -, t . ,.. v.&.. I. ' J/ l,t 1':' o.u .(' tu.r"' 222
- l .. .. �2 pr n .,\.,SG 2j .3 . d 't 0 -' n� � tc .t t ' vs ot ct .s 1 l_d to - � i' 2 2 3
� � ... 5 - y � � � r d i' 22 4
.. ... .b i l. i 0 c 1n 1� c !' 2 2 5
� -I / ." tl J r t n c 1 � t .. � )
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.