CTA Case No. 3691 (Resolution)
�~UBLlC OF I'H PBILlPPll'tl't \!OURT OF TAX .4PP�ALI QU�ZON C'""' OS C 1 TIO AL LI ITED. Petitioner� - ver u - c��� c o. 3691 I IT es onden � a S0 LU I 0 cting the tion filed by c un el for tition r on July 16. 1986 for th withdr v 1 of th petition for r view on the ground hat the ure u of Intern 1 avenue has alre dy granted the clai or refund involved herei with the ias ance of a Treasury Warr nt in th a nt f Pl61.53 .10 in fav r of pe iti r. nd there ing objection on the p rt of reapondent1 The court r olve � � prayed for. to qrant � id ion. La h ti 1 f r r view considered with r and the above-entitled ca de d cloae nd tentinat d. so 0 uez n City, etro ni1a. July 2 � 198 � ~ z. s saoci te Jud9e 2G o
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SPOUSES EDUARDO X. GENATO and LYDIA M.GENATO AND CONDOMINIUM PUSHERS, INC. AND LANDMART PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1695)
- BICOLADIA DRUG CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6937)
- WELLS FARGO ENTERPRISE GLOBAL SERVICE, LLC-PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9617)
- CTA Case No. 4490 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4490)
- SC JOHNSON PHILIPPINES, ROHQ, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2269)
- LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10079)
- CTA Case No. 3483 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3483)
- CTA Case No. 3548 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3548)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.