CTA Case No. OC-15566 (Decision)
J7'0BLIC Otl' H riiLI PI~ r � URT OF TAX APPEAL, MANU.... �� . � -n � X� � - � � � � � � .. - ! c nn � stitu 1 u 1c zn 1p o c l ct � t un � n cr t � L' t4 lv a s t c 1 s. l7 t 1n l .' t ~o rt el c 0 l� - � J 1- 1 a ( :2) t � 0 s t t 51, - � 230
231
n ch. ~~ � 0r n 1 i- c c a .c c{ � . ) w th f 1 n v~. fo . ld 1 t h 232
--4 �� J �t w� d '� Rl g dclr n d Ta -. t �fie j la - rmc , r� o. .. ~ 1 { X � � � �~� r c n h tr n d IJe 0:::' Ct . X�?j i c ... a1� r � !i 0 Ol le t . .}. - '� � � � "'g vr L ring h s st t 1 n "d . ,:, fir n � o n a"" t r c.}. .. ct :r�~ { xh. ... ...r of toe #' T!!S �- � 0 ' t� r f the t � n. ;d . � �0 c. n. -�� Cf'll 7. 0 ~ x turn lf of :a.:l � 46 .. n i� 0�' t \l 1' I,. X� r t;. Je lg g Ol.J C nd .1 c i...X � n �h Col 1 ct. of � t p.l � � ( h . ... ...p . ~0 ~ c. t �~ l :~ . l Iu � l ox "' � &i4l " v y.r. r ..i ',)., 3 9J
6 - y � J. 1 { � �� 0 0 �� .� �� 0 � 1 f � $ 1� � t .. � � � 234
J t.e _:;.J t ., ., \<Z "- ""t�! !;hV ,, � s~ u t ( ,,, t � .~ : .L .. ... J., -' t o.J .( tr �: t. 0. � 01 ' t ~~- 1. � � �t .. .~-n,.I, r.: ,. � ~':1 i. l. l .. ~ .' e..1: ~� r. . .~-11 " L � I. ''i � .1:' .l 1";.1$ 9 i!~ . "'� r .u t!i-'"' I..� .. Vi.:: �( t.,.: '! . Fronton , "' �� .,_ ? �. . 1l �...t �' �'� ''"""" ..> 2 35
fl ���.. i � 1" 7 �� � 1 X , 1 -:. t ...... �i . l 1 �I n ... 236
' � ., .v�.&...~.r 1l ~ .... - r ~ r� � tI :.0 <! "!.�~ ~.. � t Q ut i in -e ,, Q cl .~ Ill ~u t' ... , �it ..: � .... l .i.. � L� � � ,\. .' s t'. : ( � to 1 'I -� � �.- ., ~ ... $. � � i..t ' �i 1 �.' 237
. J . .. � l th the u 0 � t 1 1 � ' t � $c h VI: 1 l t. .r. 238 r tp
$� t X 1 : 1., .� i� 0 i GU ee o t;.e ad l '.~ t X l l �. '� o� l . li 1 s n. ii t-l a an'o .'..{., ' no~ 0 !:~" ti nt p- tor s 1 1 em � 'fn t .l ppoin �Gl ..J h ' s. uty ~.: n f..t- l �� J'o d �rf. 1 ft 0 �r. t �uct i 1Iai .! f .i: th ~ ~co~. t t} - ,. ,. -..,., Ql �l )l� ir , J. , !Oto s t �. !-� -l ~e � 7C I~ r � � t r ~1 lt i 239
~i �. �.;l .... tJ i � � nt l t !� 24 0
J .. 1 1 .11 � ot i n 1n n pl 0 l 13.... h .. � 'W t .\ c nt i� 241
.. 1~ - l J- ce t ltt r .in zan 1 te ti t c� J � -l e d nt � n �... t. lc u . o or �� �7 ;.l "' �� _.e. ence, de- ~ 242
d 11 n . " \i � <m .1 l c n :rv l �� c to , ,. � � ,, \~'ilt~ t ... _.[' s '-ol. ( C li".l� ' 1~ � ll4...-. j . .., :.c � n � � � 0 � .n , .\ ,. 24 3
... - l ~ ... .-e ~- n ta th � v t .l-3~ ..ti:. ;. .����������������� ~ � �������������� , �t �. ��; st .-I. 244
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 4420 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4420)
- CITIPARKING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9451)
- CTA Case No. 2861 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2861)
- ESS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7958)
- CTA Case No. 3925 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3925)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CORAL BAY NICKEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1418)
- CTA Case No. 120 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 120)
- CTA Case No. 1441 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1441)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.