CTA Case No. 212 (Decision)

--- PU Lit. � ILlfo'Pl .OURT 0 .PJiA.U t.tANlU ( � .�� 1'!!1 .- � X -.. -- . ---- T � e � ( n }, � � p � 419 �

ft& -? f B 1nc � t � s .. t � � �s � �� t �x� t :f~ l ~ � � o� :t"'- t. '.. � � �I� � ~I..:J. .. t J. � ..... tt e � t'., � r. � 0 t t tt l t .~"' 4,.=. �4" ~""'. Of. n ~ s c .....1 . vi n � lv Qn ,. -..ur t� X .. 420

1� � fu th 1 of.t!H'i� t.h h $. � t st t. f � 1 c -p 421

�� ... 4 ... ! l . co � d� � � . 422

� � . �� . . . , � .., p n zing i - n n~ e t.c tou l � � not di e � of nd tr � old cof� t �' l a 1' t 1 cal lae .. Olft i.ll� 11 d � 0 .1..i.4 ~ ._, 11 � .. t lt t to -tt � , .,. ,. .,,.., "'xor �, (' nil ) . . yp " th � ��. �~ 't&UWf tut o.t" f~Olyt;OS l !PP � out ilf ron 00 � � . ..,, � � � �� 423 �