CHEVRON HOLDINGS INC., (formerly CALTEX (ASIA) LIMITED), v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SPECIAL THIRD DIVISION CHEVRON HOLDINGS INC. [formerly CALTEX (ASIA) LIMITED], Petitioner, CTA Case No. 8064 -versus- Members: Bautista, Chairperson Cotangco-Manalastas, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF Promulgated: Tl INTERNAL REVENUE, 1� 0C 2013 X- - - - - - - - - - - - Respondent. x -----~ -----=-,::._...,r::::_:= 0:;.-.--_--".-1~ ---_-=-_-.-hZ--.-~ -a-=_-s-..:_- ~--~ ------ --- DECISION COTANGCO-MANALASTAS,~: This Petition for Review filed on March 31, 20 10 by Chevron Holdings Inc. [formerly Caltex (Asia) Limited] seeks the refund or issuance of tax credit certificate in the amount of P177,337,492.52, representing accumulated and unutilized input value-added tax (VAT) for taxable year 2008. FACTS Petitioner Chevron Holdings, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, and is licensed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to transact business in the Philippines as a Regional Operating Headquarters (ROHQ). 1 It is registered with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) as a VAT taxpayer under OCN 9RC0000136077.2 Petitioner renders services to its affiliates, subsidiaries or branches in the Asia-Pacific and North America regions pursuant to Service Agreements3 executed with its affiliates. ~ 1 Par. 1, Petition for Review, docket, p. 1. 2 Exhibit "A"; Par. 2, Stipulation of facts, Joint Stipulation of facts and Issues (JSFI), docket, p. 154. 3 Exhibits " R" to "R-17" .

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 2 of37 The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (respondent) is the government official charged with the administration and enforcement of national internal revenue laws, including the granting of refund and tax credit of taxes erroneously or illegally collected. She holds office at the BIR National Office Building, Diliman, Quezon City. Petitioner duly filed its Audited Financial Statements for taxable year 2008 and its Quarterly VAT Returns, Annual Income Tax Return, and Monthly VAT Returns for taxable year 2008 with the BIR.4 Petitioner filed an administrative claim for refund of its purported unutilized input VAT for the four quarters of taxable year 2008 on March 5, 20105 and was later amended on March 31, 20106. Due to inaction of respondent on the administrative claim for refund, petitioner filed the instant Petition for Review with this Court on March 31, 2010.7 Respondent filed her Answers on June 11, 2011, interposing the following special and affirmative defenses: "5. Taxes paid and collected by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) are presumed to have been made in accordance with law, rules and regulations and the burden to prove otherwise is upon petitioner. 6. Petitioner's alleged claim for refund is subject to administrative routinary investigation/ examination by the Bureau. 7. Petitioner must prove it is entitled to a claim for refund under the strictest terms. 8. Petitioner must prove that it paid the alleged VAT input taxes for the period in question. 9. Petitioner must prove that the same alleged VAT input taxes was not utilized against any output tax liability. 10. Petitioner must prove that the alleged VAT input t taxes for the period in question are attributable to its alleged VAT zero-rated sales. 4 Pars. 6 and 7, Stipulation of Facts, JSFI, docket, pp. 155-156; Exhibits "F" to "Q". 5 Exhibit "N-4". 6 Par. 3, Stipulation of Facts, JSFI , docket, p. 155. 7 Par. 4, Stipulation of Facts, JSFI, docket, p. 155. 8 Docket, pp. 92-102.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 3 of37 11. Petitioner must prove that the administrative and judicial claims were filed within the period prescribed by law. 12. Petitioner's assertion that its services rendered to its affiliates, subsidiaries or branches abroad are subject to zero (0%) percent VAT cannot be accorded weight. Plain allegations without any evidentiary document to support its claim will not justify petitioner's application for tax refund. 13. Petitioner must prove that its sales are VAT zero- rated as contemplated under Section 112(A) of the Tax Code of 1997. 14. The claim for refund in the amount of One Hundred Seventy Seven Million Three Hundred Thirty Seven Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Two Pesos and 52/100 (P177,337,492.52) allegedly representing accumulated and unutilized VAT input taxes paid by it for the taxable year 2008 is not properly documented. To support its claim, it is indispensable for petitioner to prove the following: a) Registration requirements of a value-added taxpayer in compliance with Section 9.236. 1 (a) of Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005 and Section 236 of the NIRC of 1997, as amended; b) Invoicing and accounting requirements for VAT- registered persons as well as the filing and payment of VAT pursuant to the provisions of Section 113 and 114 of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. Failure to comply with the invoicing requirements on the documents supporting the sale of goods and services will result in the disallowance of claim for input tax of the taxpayer claimant. (Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 42-2003) . c) Petitioner must prove that it has fully complied with the requirements of Section 9.236. 1.a of RR No. 16-2005 and Revenue Memorandum Order No. 53-98, otherwise, there would be no sufficient compliance with regard to the filing of administrative claim for tax credit/ refund which is a condition sine qua non prior to the filing of judicial claim; d) In relation thereto, Section 112 (C) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, requires submission of complete documents in support of the application for tax refund filed with respondent before the one hundred twenty (120) day period shall apply and before petitioner could avail of the judicial remedies provided by law. Ergo, petitioner's failure to submit proof of compliance ~

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 4 of37 with the aforesaid requirements warrants the dismissal of the instant Petition for Review; 15. In the case entitled (San Roque Power Corp. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue', the Supreme Court had the occasion to say: 'In order to claim a refund or tax credit under Section 112 (A), petitioner must comply with the following criteria: 1. The taxpayer is VAT-registered; 2. The tax-payer is engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; 3. The input taxes are due or paid; 4. The input taxes are not transitional input taxes; 5. The input taxes have not been applied against output taxes during and m the succeeding quarters; 6. The input taxes claimed are attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; 7. For zero-rated sales under Section 106 (A) (2) (1) and (2); 106 (B), and 108 (B) (1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds have been duly accounted for m accordance with BSP rules and regulations; 8. Where there are both zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales and taxable or exempt sales, and that the input taxes cannot be directly and entirely attributable to any of these sales, the input taxes shall be proportionately allocated on the basis of sales volume; and 9. The claim is filed within 2 years after the close of the taxable quarter when such sales were made.' 16. For a judicial claim for refund of input VAT to prosper, the petitioner must prove that there must be (a) zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; (b) that input taxes were incurred or paid; (c) that the input taxes are attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; (d) that the input taxes were not applied against any output VAT liability; and (e) the claim for refund/tax credit must be filed within the two year prescriptive period. (EG & G Omni, Inc. v. CIR, CTA Case No. 5987, March 26, 2004) 17. Corollary thereto, Sec. 4.110.8 of RR 16-2005 explicitly provides: 'Input Taxes for the importation of goods or the domestic purchases of goods, properties j or services is made in the course of trade or business, whether such input taxes shall be

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 5 of37 credited against zero-rated sales or subjected to the 5% Final Withholding VAT must be substantiated and supported by the following documents and must be reported in the information returns required to be submitted to the Bureau: (1) For the importation of goods - import entry or other equivalent document showing actual payment of VAT on imported goods; (2) For domestic purchases of goods and properties - invoice showing the information required under Sections 113 and 237 of the Tax Code.' 18. In its Petition for Review, petitioner alleged that it filed the administrative claim for tax credit/ refund on its unutilized input VAT on March 5, 2010 and subsequently, amended the same on March 31, 2010. On March 31, 2010 or the same day that it filed the amended administrative claim for refund, petitioner filed its judicial claim for refund before this Honorable Court. Suffice it to say that respondent was not given an opportunity to act on the matter. 19. Guided by the pertinent provision of Section 112 (C) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, respondent should have been given a period of one hundred twenty (120) days from March 31, 2010 or until July 29, 2010 to resolve the administrative claim for refund. As clearly provided by law, it is only after the expiration of the aforesaid period that petitioner is given 30 days or until August 23, 2010 within which to elevate the same before the Honorable Court of Tax Appeals. Ergo, since petitioner prematurely filed its judicial claim on March 31, 2010, the Honorable Court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the instant case. 20. Granting for the sake of argument that the running of the one hundred twenty (120) day period starts to run on March 5, 2010 or the date when the original administrative claim for refund was filed by petitioner, respondent, therefore, is given until July 3, 2010 within which to act on the administrative claim for refund. It is only after July 3, 2010 that petitioner is given a period of thirty days or until August 2, 2010 the right to raise the same before the Honorable Court should an unfavorable decision be given by respondent or the latter fails to act on the matter. Again, since petitioner prematurely filed the Petition for Review on March 31, 2010, the Honorable Court has no jurisdiction to hear and decide the instant case. 21. The provision of law regarding prescriptive periods are jurisdictional, compliance with which is essential for this Honorable Court to exercise authority over the instant case. Such statutes or rules are construed as mandatory as they have been absolutely indispensable to the prevention oft

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 6 of37 needless delays and to the orderly and speedy discharge of business and are necessary incidents to the proper, efficient and orderly discharge of official functions. 22. It is well-established in this jurisdiction that claims for refund are construed strictly against the claimant for the same partake of the nature of exemption from taxation and are therefore held against the claimant. Petitioner must present clear and convincing evidence to merit a tax refund. The taxpayer bears the burden of establishing the factual basis of its claim for refund. 23. Likewise, for a judicial claim to prosper, the party must not only prove that it is a VAT-registered entity, it must substantiate the input VAT paid by purchase invoices or official receipts (Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Manila Mining Corporation, 468 SCRA 571). Such that failure to comply with the requirements for a valid request for refund including the requirement for a valid sales invoice is fatal to the claim for refund. (EG & G Omni, Inc. v. CIR, CTA Case No. 5987, March 26, 2004) 24. Basic is the rule that tax refunds are regarded as tax exemptions that are in derogation of the sovereign authority and are to be construed strictissimi juris against the person or entity claiming the exemption (Philippine Phosphate Fertilizer Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 141973, June 28, 2005). The burden of proof is upon him who claims the exemption and he must be able to justify his claim by the clearest grant under Constitutional or statutory law and he cannot be permitted to rely upon vague implications. (BPI Leasing Corporation v. the Honorable Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 127624, November 18, 2003). The law does not look with favor on tax exemptions and that he who would seek to be thus privileged must justify it by words too plain to be mistaken and too categorical to be misinterpreted (Sea-Land Service vs. Court ofAppeals, 357 SCRA 444) ." Both petitioner's Pre-Trial Brief9 and respondent's Pre- Trial Brieflo were filed on July 13, 2 0 10. In the Pre-trial Order dated September 27, 2010, the Court considered the stipulations of the parties as stated in their Joint Stipulation of Facts and Issuesll filed on August 27, 2010, terminated the pre-trial, and ordered the presentation of petitioner's evidence.I2 { 9 Docket, pp. 106-115. 10 Docket, pp. 116-122. 11 Docket, pp. 154-157. 12 Pre-trial Order dated September 27, 20 I0, docket, pp. 159-164.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 7 of37 During trial, petitioner presented Jose C. Catequista, Editha B. Marquez, Ma. Teresa S. De Leon, and Ruth T. Medina as its witnesses. On the other hand, during the November 21, 2012 hearing, respondent's counsel manifested that respondent would no longer present any witness and would just submit the case for decision. 13 The case was submitted for decision on January 29, 2013, after petitioner filed its Memorandum on January 21, 2013 and respondent filed her Memorandum on January 22, 2013.14 ISSUES The parties submitted the following issues1S for this Court's resolution: "A. Whether petitioner's sales of services are zero-rated. B. Whether Petitioner has complied with the invoicing and accounting requirements for VAT-registered persons, as well as the filing and payment of VAT in compliance with the provisions of Sections 113 and 114 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended. C. Whether Petitioner has complied with the submission of complete documents in support of its administrative claim for refund pursuant to Section 112(D) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, Section 9.236 . 1 or RR No. 16-2005 and Revenue Memorandum Order No. 53-98. D. Whether petitioner paid input VAT on its purchases of goods and services for the 1st to 4th quarter of taxable year 2008. E. Whether the input taxes petitioner paid for the 1st to 4th quarters of taxable year 2008 were not applied against output VAT liabilities during said period and in succeeding quarters. F. Whether petitioner's claim for refund and/ or issuance of tax credit certificates for the amount of Php177,337,492.52 representing its unutilized and/or{ 13 Minutes of the hearing dated November 2 1, 201 2, docket, p. 840. 14 Resolution dated January 29,201 3, docket, p. 914. 15 Docket, pp. 156-157.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 8 of37 unapplied input VAT for the 1 st to 4th quarters of taxable year 2008 are attributable to its zero-rated VAT sales. G. Whether petitioner's administrative and judicial claims for refund were filed within the prescribed period." DISCUSSION/ RULING The Court will first resolve whether petitioner's administrative and judicial claims were filed within the prescriptive period. Petitioner contends that when the instant Petition for Review was filed, the controlling doctrine was that the administrative and judicial claims must be filed within the two-year period from payment of tax, as provided under Section 112(A) in relation to Section 229 of the Tax Code. It cites, among others, Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Toledo Power Inc. 16, Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. CE Cebu Geothermal Power Company, Inc. 17 , and Kepco Philippines Corporation vs. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue18 to support its claim. Petitioner further avers that the doctrine in Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Aichi Forging Company of Asia, Inc. 19 (Aichi case) should be applied prospectively. At the time of filing of the instant Petition for Review, it relied in good faith on established jurisprudence promulgated by this Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court, which consistently construed the prescriptive period of input tax refund as two years from filing of the VAT return. Retroactive application of the Aichi case undermines the established rule on judicial precedents and unfairly punishes petitioner for bona fide adhering to jurisprudence that was valid, in force, and uniformly applied at the time. Respondent, on the other hand, argues that petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies. She points out that petitioner filed its administrative claim and amended the same on March 5, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively.i 16 CTA EB No . 321 , May 7, 2008. 17 CTA EB Nos. 426 and 427, May 29, 2009. 18 CTA Case No. 6965, February 26, 2007. 19 G.R. No. 184823, October 6, 2010.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 9 of37 Also, respondent contends that petitioner did not give the former the opportunity to act on the claim as the latter filed its judicial claim on March 31, 2010, before the lapse of the 120- day period. Thus, as petitioner failed to observe the 120-day period as prescribed by law and pursuant to Aichi case doctrine, the Court has no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the instant petition and the dismissal of the same IS warranted. Section 112 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, provides: "SEC. 112. Refunds or Tax Credits ofInput Tax.- (A) Zero-rated or Effectively Zero-rated Sales. - Any VAT-registered person, whose sales are zero-rated or effectively zero-rated may, within two (2) years after the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made, apply for the issuance of a tax credit certificate or refund of creditable input tax due or paid attributable to such sales, except transitional input tax, to the extent that such input tax has not been applied against output tax: Provided, however, That in the case of zero-rated sales under Section 106(A)(2)(a)(1), (2) and (b) and Section 108(B)(1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds thereof had been duly accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP): Provided, further, That where the taxpayer is engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sale and also in taxable or exempt sale of goods of properties or services, and the amount of creditable input tax due or paid cannot be directly and entirely attributed to any one of the transactions, it shall be allocated proportionately on the basis of the volume of sales: Provided, finally, That for a person making sales that are zero-rated under Section 108(B)(6), the input taxes shall be allocated ratably between his zero-rated and non-zero-rated sales. XXX XXX XXX (C) Period within which Refund or Tax Credit of Input Taxes shall be Made. - In proper cases, the Commissioner shall grant a refund or issue the tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission of complete documents in support of the application filed m accordance with Subsection (A) hereof. In case of full or partial denial of the claim for tax f. refund or tax credit, or the failure on the part of the Commissioner to act on the application within the period

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 10 of37 prescribed above, the taxpayer affected may, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the decision denying the claim or after the expiration of the one hundred twenty day-period, appeal the decision or the unacted claim with the Court of Tax Appeals." Further, in Aichi case2o, the Supreme Court ruled that in case of tax refunds under Section 112 of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, the phrase "within two years" applies only to the filing of the administrative claim for refund and not to the filing of the judicial claim. Likewise, the 120-day period IS jurisdictional in filing an appeal with the CTA. However, in the recent case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. San Roque Power Corporation, Taganito Mining Corporation and Philex Mining Corporation21 (San Roque case}, the Supreme Court held: "To repeat, a claim for tax refund or credit, like a claim for tax exemption, is construed strictly against the taxpayer. One of the conditions for a judicial claim of refund or credit under the VAT System is compliance with the 120+30 day mandatory and jurisdictional periods. Thus, strict compliance with the 120+30 day periods is necessary for suc h a claim to prosper, whether before, during, or after the effectivity of the Atlas doctrine, except for the period from the issuance of BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 o n 10 December 2003 to 6 Oc tober 2010 when the A i chi doctrine was adopted, which again reinstated the 120+30 day periods as mandatory and jurisdictional. XXX XXX XXX BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 does provide a valid claim for equitable estoppel under Section 246 of the Tax Code. BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 expressly states that the 'taxpayer-claimant need not wait for t he lapse of the 120-day period before it could seek judicial relief with the CTA by way of Petition for Review.' Prior to this ruling, the BIR held, as shown by its position in the Court of Appeals, that the expiration of the 120-day period is mandatory and jurisdictional before a judicial claim can be filed. There is no dispute that the 120-day period is mandatory and jurisdictional, and that the CTA does not acquire jurisdiction over a judicial claim that is filed before the expiration of the 120-day period. There are, however, two exceptions to this rule. The first exception is if the ? 20 G.R. No. 184823, October 6, 2010. 21 G.R. Nos. 187485, 19611 3, and 197156, February 12,201 3.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page II of37 Commissioner, through a specific ruling, misleads a particular taxpayer to prematurely file a judicial claim with the CTA. Such specific ruling is applicable only to such particular taxpayer. The second exception is where the Commissioner, through a general interpretative rule issued under Section 4 of the Tax Code, misleads all taxpayers into filing prematurely judicial claims with the CTA. In these cases, the Commissioner cannot be allowed to later on question the CTA's assumption of jurisdiction over such claim since equitable estoppel has set in as expressly authorized under Section 246 of the Tax Code. XXX XXX XXX BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 is a general interpretative rule because it was a response to a query made, not by a particular taxpayer, but by a government agency tasked with processing tax refunds and credits, that is, the One Stop Shop Inter-Agency Tax Credit and Drawback Center of the Department of Finance. This government agency is also the addressee, or the entity responded to, in BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03. Thus, while this government agency mentions in its query to the Commissioner the administrative claim of Lazi Bay Resources Development, Inc., the agency was in fact asking the Commissioner what to do in cases like the tax claim of Lazi Bay Resources Development, Inc., where the taxpayer did not wait for the lapse of the 120-day period. Clearly, BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 is a general interpretative rule. Thus, all taxpayers can rely on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 from the time of its issuance on 10 December 2003 up to its reversal by this Court in Aichi on 6 October 2010, where this Court held that the 120+30 day periods are mandatory and jurisdictional." (Emphasis supplied) The present claim covers the four taxable quarters of year 2008, which closed on March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2008. Counting two years from the said dates, petitioner had until March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2010, respectively, within which to file its administrative claim for refund. Petitioner filed its original administrative claim on March 5, 201022; thus, it was filed well within the two-year period prescribed under Section 112 (A) of the NIRC of 1997. Petitioner filed its judicial claim on March 31, 2010, before the lapse of the 120-day period prescribed by law./ 22 Exhibit "N-4"; Par. 3, Stipulation of Facts, JSFI , docket, p. 155.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 12 of37 However, considering the doctrine in the San Roque case, the mandatory and jurisdictional nature of the 120+30-day period does not apply on claims for refund that were filed during the period of December 10, 2003 to October 6, 2010. Accordingly, petitioner's judicial claim for the four quarters of 2008 shall be considered as timely filed. Anent the issue of submission of complete documents in support of petitioner's administrative claim, petitioner argues that it attached to its administrative claim filed on March 5, 20 10 its BIR Certificate of Registration, Annual Income Tax Return, Audited Financial Statements, Quarterly and Monthly VAT Returns for year 2008, and Service Agreements with its foreign affiliates. It further alleges that it complied with respondent's request for presentation of books of accounts and other accounting records by submitting additional documents consisting of Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, SEC Certificate of Registration, list of company officers, Claimant Information Sheet, VAT Registration Payment for taxable year 2008/Annual Registration, VAT return showing the amount of tax credit certificate applied, VAT returns prior to period of claim with excess input carry-over (taxable year 2007), BIR Authority to Print Invoice/Receipts, Computerized Accounting System, Schedule of Bank Credit Memo, Schedule of Acquisition, Depreciation and Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment, and Schedule of zero-rated taxable and exempt sales. It has also informed respondent that all other voluminous documents shall be made available to its revenue officers for examination at its office premises. Respondent, in her Memorandum, contends that Section 112(C) clearly states that there should be a prior administrative claim filed with respondent before judicial resort can be had before this Court, where relevant documents must be submitted by the taxpayer to support its claim for refund. Failure on the part of the taxpayer to submit relevant documents in the administrative level makes the administrative claim for refund or tax credit pro-forma and shall be construed as if no administrative claim was filed. 23 She likewise points out that petitioner failed to submit the documentary requirements provided in Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No . 53-98. ? 23 Docket, pp. 904-905 .

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 13 of37 Records show that petitioner, upon the filing of its administrative claim24 on March 5, 2010, simultaneously submitted the supporting documents. This is evident from petitioner's letter, which states: "In support of our request, we attach the following: 1. Application for Tax Credit/Refund (BIR Form No. 914) 2. SEC Certificate of Registration as amended 3. BIR Certificate of Registration (BIR Form No. 2303) 4. Annual Income Tax Return for taxable year 2008 (BIR Form No. 1702) 5. Quarterly VAT returns for taxable year 2008 (BIR Form No. 2550Q) 6. Monthly VAT returns for taxable year 2008 (BIR Form No. 2550M) 7. Audited Financial Statements for year ended December 31, 2008 8. Service Agreements with affiliates of MSSC. We reserve the right to submit other documents as may be required by this Honorable Office." The term "complete documents" under Section 112 (C) of the NIRC of 1997 should be understood to refer to those documents that are necessary to support the application for refund or tax credit certificate, as determined by the taxpayer. The BIR examiner can require the taxpayer to submit additional documents but the examiner cannot demand what type of supporting documents should be submitted. Otherwise, the taxpayer will be at the mercy of the examiner, who may require the production of documents that the taxpayer cannot submit. Moreover, it is basic that respondent ought to know the tax records of all taxpayers. 25 Clearly, petitioner has submitted supporting documents for its claim for refund. The Court will now address the other stipulated issues./ 24 Exhibit "N-4", p. 10. 25 Diageo Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner ofInternal Revenue, CTA Case Nos. 7846 and 7865, January 16,2012.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 14 of37 For the four quarters of taxable year 2008, petitioner duly filed with the BIR its Quarterly VAT declaring the following: 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter T otal (Ex hibit "F ") (Exhibit "G") (Exhibit "H ") (Exhibit "I") p 607,465,244.42 Vatable Sales/ p 134,461 ,442 .54 p 138,685,850.30 p 156,933,440 . 14 p 177,384,511.44 3 ,714,905 ,618.20 Receipts 1,158 123,247.65 851 ,422 ,577 .20 817,860 ,770 .89 887,499,022.46 4,322,370,862.62 Zero-Rated Sales/ 1 335,507,759.09 Receip ts 985 884,019.74 956,546,621.19 1,044,432,462.60 Total Sales/ Receipts Output Tax Due 16,135,373. 10 16,642,302.04 18,832,012.82 21,286,141.37 72,895,829.3 3 Less: Allowable 196,500 ,668 .53 224,672,224 .94 214 ,640 ,905.97 264 ,805,262 .32 196 ,500 ,668 .53 Input Tax 56 ,047 ,954 .94 52 ,541,098.61 51 207 104.97 48,038,623 .69 56 047 954.94 Input Tax Carried 252 548,623.47 277,213 323.55 265,848,010.94 312 843,886.01 252 ,548,623. 4 7 Over from Previous Quarter 211,314.29 - 18,800.90 - 230 , 115 . 19 Input Tax Deferred 2,748 ,560.39 on Capital Goods - 2,280,557 .37 468 ,003.02 - Exceeding Pl Million from Previous 1 032,649.22 930 ,498 .73 849,007.44 1 284 ,560.48 4,096 ,715 .87 Quarter 39,338,233 .78 38,798 ,792.83 65 ,048 ,282 .71 46,911,553.19 190,096 ,862 .51 Total 217 ,875 .89 70 ,097 .22 - 152,877.04 440,850 . 15 40 800 073.18 42,079 946.15 66,384,094.07 48 348,990.71 197 613 104.11 Current transactions Purchase of Capital 293,348 696.65 319,293,269.70 332,232,105.01 361 192,876.72 450 161,727.58 Goods not exceeding PlM 52,541,098.61 5 1,207,104.97 48,038,623 .68 44 ,394,339.34 44 ,394,339.34 Purchase of Capital 36,802 ,956.72 - 36,802 ,956.72 Goods exceeding Pl M - 556,206. 19 - Purchase of Goods - 556 ,206 . 19 (other than Capital - 88,010 061.69 48 594,829.87 - 81 753 502.25 Goods) 52 541 098.61 44 394 339.34 Purchase of Services Services Rendered by 240,807 598.04 231,283,208.01 283 637 275.14 316,798,537.38 368 408,225.33 Non-residents P224,672,224.94 P214,640,905.97 p 264,805,262.32 p 295,512,396.01 p 295,512,396.00 Total 1- Total Available Input Tax Less: Deductions from Input Tax Input Tax on Purchases of Capital Goods exceeding Pl Million deferred for the succeeding period VAT Refund/TCC claimed Others Total Total Allowable Input Tax Net VAT Overpayment

DEC ISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 15 of37 As indicated in the returns, petitioner's total allowable input VAT arising from its amortization of input VAT on purchases of capital goods exceeding P1Million, domestic purchases of capital goods not exceeding P 1Million, domestic purchases of goods other than capital goods, domestic purchases of services, and services rendered by non-residents for the four quarters of 2008 amounted to P209 ,266 ,719. 71, broken down as follows: 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Input Tax Deferred on p 56,047,954.94 p 52 ,541,098.61 p 51,207,104.97 p 48,038 ,623 .69 p 56,047,954.94 Capital Goods exceeding - 2,280,557 .37 P1Million from Previous 468 ,003 .02 - 2 ,748 ,560.39 Quarter p 56,047,954.94 p 54,821 ,655 .98 Add: Input Tax on Capital p 51 ,675,107.99 p 48,038,623.69 p 58,796,515.33 Goods exceeding P1Million 52,541 ,098.61 51,207,104.97 Purchased this Quarter p 3 ,506 ,856 .33 p 3 ,614 ,551.01 48,038,623 .68 44,394 ,339.34 44,394,339.34 Total: Unamortized Input Tax on Capital Goods 211 ,314.29 - p 3 ,636 ,484.31 p 3 ,644,284.35 p 14,402 ,175.99 exceeding P1Million 1 032 649.22 930 ,498 .73 Less: Input Tax on 39,338 233.78 38,798,792.83 18,800 .90 - 230,115. 19 Purchases of Cap Goods 849 ,007.44 1,284,560.48 4 ,096 ,715.87 exceeding P1M deferred 217 ,875.89 70 ,097 .22 65,048,282 .71 46 ,911,553 . 19 190,096 862.51 for the succeeding period P44,306,929.51 P43,413,939.79 Amortization of Input Tax - 152,877.04 440 ,850. 15 on Capital Goods P69,552,575.36 P51 ,993,275.06 P209,266,719 .71 exceeding P1 Million Add: Input Tax on: Purchase of Capital Goods not exceeding P1 Million Purchases of Goods Other than Capital Goods Purchase of Services Services Rendered by Non-Residents Total Allowable Input Tax Per Return Out of the P209,266 ,719. 7 1 total allowable input VAT reflected in its 2008 Quarterly VAT Returns , petitioner is claiming refund of the amount of P177 ,337,492.5226 input VAT allegedly attributable to its declared zero-rated sales/receipts for the same period, broken down as follows: 2008 Input VAT Claim 1st Quarter p 37,802,114.97 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 36,662,187.06 4th Quarter 58,249,60 1.15 44,623,589 .35 Total P177,337,492.52 26 Petition for Review, docket, p. 6.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 16 of37 Pursuant to Section 112(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, in order to be entitled to a tax credit or refund of excess input VAT attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero- rated sales, the following requisites must be satisfied: 1. that there must be zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; 2. that input taxes were incurred or paid; 3. that such input taxes are attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; 4. that the input taxes were not applied against any output VAT liability; and 5. that the claim for refund was filed within the two-year prescriptive period. As the Court already declared that the administrative and judicial claims of petitioner were timely filed, the Court will proceed to address the aforesaid remaining requisites. Anent the first requisite, petitioner alleges that the services it renders to its affiliates abroad are subject to zero percent (0�/o) VAT pursuant to Section 108(B)(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, which reads as follows: "SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Transactions Subject to Zero Percent (0%) Rate. - The following services performed in the Philippines by VAT- registered persons shall be subject to zero percent (0%) rate: (1) Processing, manufacturing or repacking goods for other persons doing business outside the Philippines which goods are subsequently exported, where the services are paid for in acceptable foreign currency and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP); (2) Services other than those mentioned in the preceding paragraph rendered to a person engaged in business conducted outside the Philippines or to a nonresident person not engaged in business who is outside the Philippines when the services are performed, the consideration for which is paid for in acceptable foreign j currency and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP);"

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 In the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Burmeister and Wain Scandinavian Contractor Mindanao, Inc.27, the Supreme Court held that in order for the supply of services to be VAT zero-rated under Section 108(B)(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, the following requisites must be met: 1. the services must be other than processing, manufacturing or repacking of goods; 2. the payment for such services must be in acceptable foreign currency accounted for in accordance with the BSP rules and regulations; and 3. the recipient of such services is doing business outside the Philippines. Corollary to the second requisite, Sections 113(A)(2), (B)(1), (2)(c) and (3) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, as implemented by Sections 4 . 113-1(A)(2), B(1) and (2)(c) of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 16-05 provide that a VAT taxpayer, like herein petitioner, shall for every lease of goods or properties and for every sale, barter or exchange of services, issue a VAT official receipt which must contain the following information: "SEC. 113. Invoicing and Accounting Requirements for VAT-Registered Persons. - (A) Invoicing Requirements. - A VAT-registered person shall issue: XXX XXX XXX (2) A VAT official receipt for every lease of goods or properties, and for every sale, barter or exchange of services. (B) Information Contained in the VAT Invoice or VAT Official Receipt. - The following information shall be indicated in the VAT invoice or VAT official receipt: (1) A statement that the seller is a VAT-registered person, followed by his Taxpayer's Identification Number (TIN); ~ 27 G.R. No. 153205, January 22,2007.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 18 of37 (2) The total amount which the purchaser pays or 1s obligated to pay to the seller with the indication that such amount includes the value-added tax: Provided, that: XXX XXX XXX (c) If the sale is subject to zero percent (0%) value- added tax, the term 'zero-rated sale' shall be written or printed prominently on the invoice or receipt; XXX XXX XXX (3) The date of transaction, quantity, unit cost and description of the goods or properties or nature of the service;" (Emphasis supplied) "SEC. 4.113-1. Invoicing Requirements. - (A) A VAT-registered person shall issue: - XXX XXX XXX (2) A VAT official receipt for every lease of goods or properties, and for every sale, barter or exchange of services. Only VAT-registered persons are required to print their TIN followed by the word 'VAT' in their invoice or official receipts. Said documents shall be considered as a 'VAT Invoice' or VAT official receipt. All purchases covered by invoices/receipts other than VAT Invoice/VAT Official Receipt shall not give rise to any input tax. VAT invoice I official receipt shall be prepared at least in duplicate, the original to be given to the buyer and the duplicate to be retained by the seller as part of his accounting records. (B) Information contained in VAT invoice or VAT official receipt. - The following information shall be indicated in VAT invoice or VAT official receipt: (1) A statement that the seller is a VAT-registered person, followed by his TIN; (2) The total amount which the purchaser pays or is J obligated to pay to the seller with the indication that such amount includes the VAT; Provided, That: XXX XXX XXX

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 19 of37 (c) If the sale is subject to zero percent (0%) VAT, the term 'zero-rated sale' shall be written or printed prominently on the invoice or receipt;" (Emphasis supplied) Records prove that petitioner is registered with the BIR as VAT taxpayer28 and the services it performs in the Philippines through its Regional Operating Headquarters such as general administration and planning; business planning and coordination; sourcing and procurement of raw materials and components; corporate finance advisory services; marketing control and sales promotion; training and personnel management; logistic services; research and development services and product development; technical support and maintenance; data processing and communications and business development29 are not in the same category as "processing, manufacturing or repacking of goods". For services rendered for the four taxable quarters of 2008, petitioner received US dollar payments with the peso equivalent of P3,714,905,618.20, which were accounted for in accordance with the BSP rules and regulations as evidenced by the bank certification of inward remittances30 issued by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A and duly supported by VAT zero- rated official receipts31 issued by petitioner to its affiliate- clients. To prove that its affiliate-clients are non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines, petitioner presented Certifications of Non-Registration of Corporation/Partnership issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission32 of the Republic of the Philippines, Service Agreements33, Articles of Association, Articles/ Certificate of Incorporation34 , and printed screenshots J of the United States SEC website for company filings of Chevron Corporation35, enumerated as follows: 28 Par. 2, Stipulation of Facts, JSFI , docket, p. 154. 29 Exhibit "D", Notes to Financial Statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, Note I -General Information. 30 Exhibits "B" to "B-3", "W" to "W-2", "X" to "X-4", and "Y" to "Y-3". 31 Exhibits "S-1" to "S-117'', "T-1" to "T-115", "U-1'' to "U-138", and "V-1" to "V-133". 32 Exhibits "C" to "C-43", and "HHHH" to "HHHH-62". 33 Exhibits "R" to "R-17". 34 Exhibits "SS" to "EEEE". 35 Exhibits "GGGG" to "GGGG-8".

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 20 of37 Name of Aff"Jliate SEC Service Certificate I State, Province Certificate Agreements or Country in Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. Articles of which organize d (Exhibit) (Exhibit) Caltex Oil Products Company "C-9" Association I per printed screenshot s of Caltex Oil Zambia Ltd. "H4" Incorporation/ Caltex Trading and Transport "C-1" Certificate of U.S. SEC Corporation Registration website (Exhs. Chevron China Investment Co. "H4-2" Ltd. (Exhibit) Q4 to Q9) "H 4- 3 " Chevron (Lao) Limited "H 4- 6 " "XX" Bermuda "H4-4" Chevron (Mauritius) Limited "H4-5" "EEEE" Chevron (Thailand) Limited "C-42" "AAA" Bahamas C-39 "BBB" Chevron (Tianjin) Lub Co. Ltd " H 4- 7 " Chevron Africa - Pakistan "CCC", Australia Services "H 4-9 " "DDDD" "H 4- 8 " Chevron Africa Holdings Limited "H4-10" "EEE" "H4-11" Chevron Africa Latin America EP "H 4- 1 2 " "FFF" "H4-13" Chevron Alkalij "H4- 14" "R-2" Chevron Asia Pacific Holdings "C-24" Limited "H 4- 1 5 " Canada California Chevron Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. "H4- 16" Delaware Chevron Asia South Ltd. "C-41" "H 4- 1 7 " Chevron Australia PTY Ltd. "H4-18" Chevron Bahrain Chevron Bahrain Trading Company B.S. Chevron Bangladesh Blocks 13/14 LTD Chevron Benin S.A. Chevron Business and Real Estate Service Chevron Business Support Center Chevron Cambodia Ltd. Chevron Canada Ltd. Chevron Congo Chevron Corporation Chevron Cote Chevron Egypt Lubricants SAE Chevron Energy Technology Co. Chevron Environmental Management Company Chevron Exploration and Production Chevron Geothermal Salak Ltd. Chevron Global Downstream LLC Chevron Global Energy Inc. Chevron Global Gas

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 21 of37 Chevron Global Lubricants "H4 -19" Delaware Chevron Global Technology "C-36" Services Company "C-34" "LLL" Chevron Global Trading Limited "C-27" "PPP" Chevron Holdings Inc. - Taiwan "H4 -20" Chevron HongKong Ltd. "H 4 - 2 1 " "TTT" Chevron Indonesia Co. "H4 -22", "AAA" Chevron Information Technology "H4 -25" Co . "H 4 - 2 3 " "R-4 "UUU" New Zealand Chevron International E&P Tech. "H 4 - 2 4 " "R-15" "XXX" Nigeria Services Chevron International "H4 -54" Delaware Exploration Production "C-20" Singapore "H 4 - 2 7 " Chevron International Gas Inc. "H4 -28" Bahamas Chevron International Limited "C-21" Delaware Chevron International PTE Ltd. Chevron Japan Ltd. "H4 -30" NPPC/Chevron Joint Venture "H4-31" Chevron Kenya Ltd. "H 4 - 3 2 " Chevron Korea Inc. "C-28" Chevron Kuo PTE Ltd. "C-30" Chevron Limited "C-18" Chevron Lubricants Lanka "C-23" Limited "H4 -33" Chevron Malawi Ltd. "H4 -35" "H4 -36" Chevron Malaysia Limited "H 4 - 3 7 " Chevron Mauritius Ltd. "H4 -38" Chevron NA Exploration Prod "H4 -39" Co. "H4 -40" Chevron Netherlands BV Chevron New Zealand "H4 -41" Chevron Nigeria Limited "H4 -42" "C-43" Chevron North Sea Limited Chevron Oil Nigeria Chevron Oronite Company LLC Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. Chevron Overseas Petroleum Chevron Overseas Services Corporation Chevron Pakistan Limited Chevron Petroleum Nigeria Ltd. Chevron Pipe Line Company Chevron Policy Gov't Public Affairs Chevron Products Company Chevron Remittance Processing Chevron Reunion Limited Chevron Services Company Chevron Services Corporation Chevron Shipping Co. LLC Chevron Singapore PTE Ltd. Chevron South Africa PTY Limited

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 22 of37 Chevron Tankers Limited "H4-43" "R-3" "AAAA" Bermuda "C-17" "BBBB" Indonesia Chevron Tanzania Limited Chevron Texaco Global Energy C-32 "UU" Inc. "CCCC" Chevron Texaco China Energy "H4 -44" Co. Chevron Thailand Exploration "H4 -45" and Production Ltd. "H4 -47" Chevron Togo SA "H4 -48" Chevron Trading PTE Ltd. "H4 -49" "C-40" Chevron Uganda Ltd. "H 4 - 5 0 " Chevron USA (Singapore Branch) "H 4 - 5 1 " Chevron USA Inc. - Shipping Branch "C-10" I Chevron Vietnam Block Ltd. CNS - Energy Technology Co. UK "H4 -52" "H4 -53" CT Global Trading "H4 -56" CUSA- Global Lubricants Asia "H4 -55" Pacific "H4 -57" CUSA - Project Olympic Branch "H4 -58" CXA Exports Ltd. "H4 -59" Fuel and Marine Marketing LLC "H 4 - 6 0 " "H 4 - 6 1 " LNG Marketing and Trading "H 4 - 6 2 " LNG Regasification Ventures Project Resources Company PT Chevron Oil Products Indonesia PT Chevron Pacific Indonesia Singapore Telecommunications Limited Star Holding Company Limited Star Petroleum Refining Co. Ltd. Talcor PTY Ltd. Texaco Cameroun UNOCAL East China Sea Ltd. Each one of the enumerated documents, standing alone, is inadequate proof that petitioner's client is a non-resident foreign corporation doing business outside the Philippines. While the SEC Certificates of Non-Registration show that the named entities therein are not registered corporations/partnerships in the Philippines, the same do not prove that such entities are non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines. Likewise, the Service Agreements only show the names of petitioner's customers to whom it renders services but the same do not establish that such customers are non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines. Also, the Articles of Association, the Articles/Certificate of Incorporation, and the printed screenshots of the United States SEC website fort

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 23 of37 company filings of Chevron Corporation only prove that the named entities therein were incorporated or organized abroad but do not establish that such entities are not doing business in the Philippines. In order to be considered as non-resident foreign corporation doing business outside the Philippines, each entity must be supported at the very least by both SEC certificate of Non-Registration of Corporation/Partnership and Certificate/Articles of Foreign Incorporation/Association or printed screenshots of US SEC website showing the state/province/country where the entity was organized. Thus, only the following clients of petitioner shall be considered as non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines: Name of Afri.J.iate SEC Certificate I State, Province Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. Certificate or Country in Caltex Trading and Transport Corporation Articles of which organized (Exhibit) Chevron Asia Pacific Holdings Limited "C-9" Association I per printed Chevron Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. "C-1" screenshots of Chevron Canada Ltd. Incorporation/ Chevron Environmental Management "C-42" Certificate of U.S. SEC Company "C-39" Registration website (Exhs. Chevron Global Technology Services Company "C-24" Chevron Global Trading Limited (Exhibit) G4 to G9 ) Chevron Nigeria Limited "H 4 - 1 7 " Bermuda Chevron Oronite Company LLC "C-36" "EEEE" Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. "C-34" "CCC", Canada Chevron Overseas Petroleum Inc. "C-28" "DODD" Chevron Pakistan Limited "C-23" "EEE" California Chevron Pipe Line Company "H 4 - 3 3 " Delaware Chevron Thailand Exploration and Production "H4-35" "LLL" Ltd. "H4-37" Nigeria Star Holding Company Limited "H 4 - 3 9 " "XXX" Delaware Singapore "C-32" "CCCC" "H 4 - 5 8 " Bahamas Delaware Bermuda Accordingly, petitioner's sales of services to the afore- mentioned entities for the year 2008 in the amount of P148,916,911.18 shall be subject to zero percent (Oo/o) VAT ? pursuant to Section 108(B)(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, detailed as follows:

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 24 of37 OR No. OR Date Name of Affiliate Sales (in Sales (in Php) Exhibit USD) First Quarter of 2008 JANUARY 2947 29-Jan-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. $ 151,107.76 p 6,183,184.73 S-1 6,501.89 267,435.42 S-7 2976 25-Jan-08 Chevron Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. 5,756.33 236,769.09 S-17 339.02 13,944.55 S-12 2977 25-Jan-08 Chevron Global Trading 11,710.89 481,691.76 S-32 678.04 27,758.26 S-33 2996 25-Jan-08 Chevron Environmental Mngt. Co. 196.34 7,990 .66 S-45 S-55 2973 25-Jan-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 163,491.16 6,724,710.43 2951 18-Jan-08 Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. 2953 30-Jan-08 Chevron Thailand Exploration 2965 25-Jan-08 Star Holding Co. Limited FEBRUARY 3021 26-Feb-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 3,509.90 142,652 .77 S-57 6,563.00 267,250.15 S-61 3013 22-Feb-08 Chevron Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. 1,436.74 S-64 18,047.82 58,393.38 S-72 3023 26-Feb-08 Chevron Global Trading 9,120.19 733,517.04 S-84 371,355.34 3017 26-Feb-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 3012 22-Feb-08 Star Holding Co. Limited MARCH 3046 25-Mar-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 3,440.40 143,261.66 S-85 1,463.75 59,827 .69 S-95 3049 25-Mar-08 Chevron Global Trading 6,449 .21 S-104 2,150.05 268,551.48 S-111 3045 25-Mar-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 2,751.78 89,463.52 S - 117 Subtotal 2941 27-Mar-08 Chevron Thailand Exploration 114,586.84 P16, 192,344.7 7 3047 25-Mar-08 Star Holding Co. Limited Second Quarter of 2008 $ 9,261.27 p 388,547.80 T-17 APRIL 6,445.72 270,424.07 T-18 2,708.77 113,643.88 T-22 825 25-Apr-08 Chevron Global Trading 1,952.31 T-24 826 25-Apr-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 272.06 81,907.32 T-30 830 25-Apr-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 1,204.51 11,414.02 T-41 832 25-Apr-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 50,659.26 838 25-Apr-08 Chevron Environmental Mngt. Co. 808 28-Apr-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 117,807.83 5,116,051.52 T-47 MAY 1,499.21 65,515.46 T-52 848 23-May-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 5,507.06 T-57 856 28-May-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 239,931.86 T-64 868 27-May-08 Chevron Global Trading 20,014.08 873,473.81 T-65 850 29-May-08 Chevron Nigeria Limited 239.13 T-66 845 26-May-08 Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. 382.30 10,386.84 T-76 872 27-May-08 Chevron Pipe Line Company 16,656.07 869 27-May-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 2,498.73 108,864.79 JUNE 913 25-Jun-08 Chevron Pipe Line Company 433.71 19,362.05 T-100 911 25-Jun-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 2 ,452.47 109,485 .27 T-115 909 25-Jun-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 3,983.66 177,841.96 T-77 880 26-Jun-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 1,499.21 T-79 884 17-Jun-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 8,255.82 66,800. 19 T-98 904 25-Jun-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 22,804.01 366,887.83 T-99 Subtotal 1,018,036.16 P9 , 105,890. 16

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 25 of37 Third Quarter of 2008 JULY 950 28-Jul-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. $ 128,984.90 p 5,696,483.22 U-1 Chevron Environmental Mngt. Co. 240.05 10,601.56 U-11 970 28-Jul-08 Chevron Global Trading 95,762.47 U-16 Chevron Nigeria Limited 2,168.34 U-34 962 28-Jul-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 7,236.40 319,588.04 U-36 Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. 5,271.22 232,797.92 U-37 957 28-Jul-08 Chevron Pipe Line Company U-38 Star Holding Co. Limited 210.98 9,317.71 U-59 958 28-Jul-08 205.76 9,087 . 18 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 284.26 12,516.51 971 28-Jul-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. Chevron Global Trading 13,162. 11 972 28-Jul-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 1,499.21 Chevron Overseas Petroleum 3,749.39 943 25-Jul-08 Chevron Pipe Line Company 7,908.33 Star Holding Co. Limited 512.11 AUGUST 297.66 Chevron Thailand Exploration 999 26-Aug-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 547,707.00 165,319.91 U-60 Chevron Global Trading 68,365.61 U-63 1002 26-Aug-08 Chevron Asia Pacific PTE Ltd. 703.96 170,976.27 U-71 Chevron Canada Ltd. 107,280. 15 U-81 998 26-Aug-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 360,628.47 U-82 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 3,749.39 23,367.05 U-83 996 26-Aug-08 86.68 13,573.62 U-97 979 21-Aug-08 11,374.00 24,976,036.63 3,506.33 1004 26-Aug-08 3,073.81 Subtotal 985 21-Aug-08 $ 144,528.53 SEPTEMBER 70,003.17 8,537.13 1022 23-Sep-08 308.14 32,560.29 U-105 308.14 4,984,025.40 U-117 1035 25-Sep-08 5,404.64 U- 123 638.34 174,189.31 U-127 1041 25-Sep-08 17,259.27 4,026.98 U-128 17, 165.71 U-131 1045 25-Sep-08 528,413.74 U-132 3,316.35 162,897.22 1046 26-Sep-08 3 ,749.39 142,803.19 18,639.26 P38, 193 ,338.30 1049 26-Sep-08 270.83 1050 26-Sep-08 6,350.76 107,280.15 Fourth Quarter of 2008 p 7 ,022,766.28 V-2 OCTOBER 4,675.81 340,786.86 V-4 1,499.21 418,076.89 V-16 1111 24-0ct-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. 2,153.15 15,090.11 V-23 1073 28-0ct-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 15,090.11 V-29 1093 27-0ct-08 Chevron Canada Ltd. 264,673.85 V-30 1106 27-0ct-08 Chevron Environmental Management Co. 31,337.26 V-44 1104 27-0ct-08 Chevron Global Tech Services 845,214.01 V-46 1094 27-0ct-08 Chevron Global Trading 840,632.22 V-64 1122 30-0ct-08 Chevron Nigeria Limited 1089 27-0ct-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 165,156.87 V-68 1090 27-0ct-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 186,908.77 V-77 NOVEMBER 928,250.00 V-89 1145 25-Nov-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. V-90 1150 26-Nov-08 Chevron Global Trading 13,501.00 V-97 1134 25-Nov-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 316,272.91 V-101 1152 26-Nov-08 Chevron Oronite PTE Ltd. 5 ,347,963.61 1136 25-Nov-08 Chevron Thailand Exploration 1146 26-Nov-08 Star Holding Co. Limited 219,727.91 V-102 DECEMBER 69,860.67 V-104 1178 19-Dec-08 Cabinda Gulf Oil Co. Ltd. V-110 1182 23-Dec-08 Caltex Transport and Trading Corp. 101,181.86 1181 19-Dec-08 Chevron Canada Ltd.

DEC ISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 26 of3 7 1174 19-Dec-08 Chevron Oronite Co. LLC 12, 166.68 571 ,742.48 V- 119 1159 04 -Dec- 08 Chevron Pakistan Ltd. 1,2 69 ,012 .60 62 ,636 ,357.35 V- 120 1161 18-Dec-08 Star Holding Co. Limited V- 133 107,280.15 5 ,074,746.93 Subtotal p 85,425,337.95 Total Valid Zero-Rated Sales for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarter of2008 P148,916,911.18 The rest of petitioner's declared zero-rated sales in the amount of P3,565,988,707.02 (P3 ,714,905,618.20 less P148 , 916,911.18) shall be denied VAT zero-rating for petitioner's failure to prove that the entities to whom it rendered services are non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines. Having resolved that petitioner had valid VAT zero-rated sales for the four quarters of 2008 in the amount of P 148,916,911. 18, the Court will now determine the amount of unutilized and excess input VAT attributable thereto. In support of its reported input VAT of P209 , 266 ,719 . 71 , petitioner presented various suppliers' invoices, official receipts, and other documents which were all examined by the Court-commissioned Independent CPA, Mr. Jose C. Catequista. In his Partial/Preliminary Report and Supplemental/Final Report dated October 11 , 201036 and May 31, 20 1137, respectively, Mr. Catequista accounted for the total amount of P208,595,755.40 input VAT, broken down as follows : Particulars 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total PARTIAL I PRELIMINARY REPORT Purchases of good s supported by valid VAT in voices38 p 641,570.95 p 539,269.72 - p 973,425.20 p 2,154,265.87 3 1,058,725.33 Purchases of services 1,969,797.60 supported by valid VAT 0Rs39 32,746,200.67 P29,749,021.69 41,091 ,796.85 134,645,744.54 Purchases of services supported by CTC VAT 0Rs40 - - - 1,969,797.60 Subtotal P33,387,771.62 P33,567,792.65 P29,749,021.69 P42,065,222.05 P138,769,808.01 SUPPLEMENTAL I FINAL REPORT Purchases of goods supported by valid VAT invoices41 p 140,805.55 p 168,393.88 p 753,182.65 p 115,572 .79 p 1, 1 7 7 , 9 5 4 .8 7 36 Exhi.bi.ts "NN" to "NN-3". j 37 Exhibits ""WWWWWW" to "WWWWWW-3". 38 Exhibits "FF-1 " to "FF-78", " HH-1" to "HH-102", and " LL-1 " to "LL- 108". 39 Exhibits "GG-1 " to "GG- 180" " II - I" to "II-290" "KK-1 " to "KK-122" and "MM-1 " to "MM-319" 40 Exh ibits "JJ-1" to "JJ-7". ' ' '

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 27 of37 Purchases of services 4,515,442.20 3,776,628.98 32,933,697.02 1,878,825.50 43,104,593.70 supported by valid VAT 3,148,303.24 0Rs42 2,326,863.58 3,255,662.29 3,275,286.64 3,281,936.35 12,961' 188.52 Amortized input VAT on 358,554.13 2,216,476.08 2,461,388.79 4,136,493.33 11,141,221.78 capital goods exceeding P10,489,968.70 P1M43 358,888.72 361,197.67 362,348.00 1,440,988.52 Input VAT on purchases of goods and services with P9,776,049.95 P39,784,752.77 P9,775,175.97 p 69,825,947.39 noted exceptions44 Amortized input VAT on capital goods exceeding P1M with noted exceptions45 Subtotal Total Input VAT P43,877,740.32 P43,343,842.60 P69,533,774.46 P51,840,398.02 P208,595,755.40 accounted by the ICPA As earlier stated, petitioner reflected in its 2008 Quarterly VAT Returns the following input taxes in the total amount ofP209,266,719.71 : 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Total Input P44,306,929.51 P43,4 13,9 39.79 P69,552,575.36 P51,993,275. 0 6 P209,266,719.71 VAT per Return On the other hand, petitioner's claim was computed based on the lower input VAT of P206 ,659 , 149.05 , as shown below: 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Sales subject to 1'134,461 ,442.54 1'138,685,850.30 p 156,933,440.14 p 177,384,511.44 p 607,465,244.42 VAT 851,422,577.20 817,860,770.89 887,499,022.46 1, 158,123,247.65 3,714,905,618.20 956,546,621.19 1,335,507'759.09 4,322 ,370,862. 62 Zero-rated sales 985,884,019.74 1,044,432,462.60 Total Sales % of Zero-rated 86.36% 85.50% 84.97% 86.72% 206,659 , 149.05 Sales/Total 43,772,037.59 42,879,047.88 68,549,680.43 51,458,383.15 p 177,337,492.51 Sales p 37,802,114.96 p 36,662,187.06 p 58,249,601.15 p 44,623,589.35 Total Input Tax Input Tax attributable to Zero-rated Sales Thus, the Court shall have as reference point the lower input VAT of P206,659 , 149.05 1n the determination of petitioner's refundable claim. ~ 41 Exhibits "FF-79" to "FF- 100", "HH-1 03" to "HH-144",, "LL-109" to "LL-129", and "NNNNN-1" to "NNNNN-109". 42 Exhibits "GG-181" to "GG-291", "II-291" to "11-484", "KK-123" to "KK-450", and "MM-320" to "MM-441". 43 Exhibits "LLLLLL-1" to "LLLLLL-459". 44 Exhibits "PPPP" to "BBBBB-4", "CCCCC" to "MMMMM-7", "00000" to "WWWWW-6", and "XXXXX" to "KKKKKK-43". 45 Exhibits "MMMMMM" to "TTTTTT-1 ".

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 28 of37 Based on his review and validation of petitioner's claimed input VAT, the Independent CPA noted the following exceptions totalling P11 , 141 ,221 .78 : Particulars Input VAT Exhibit FIRST QUARTER OF 2008 p 1,587.06 PPPP to PPPP-1 a. Domestic purchases of goods supported by invoices without QQQQ to QQQQ-1 7,890.12 RRRR to RRRR-1 authority to print b. Domestic purchases of goods supported by service invoice 165,000.00 SSSS to SSSS-6 3,629.04 TTTT to TTTT-24 only UUUU to UUUU-1 c. Domestic purchases of goods with statement account or 592,346.42 VVVV to VVVV-7 WWWW to WWWW-1 billing statement as support only 11,652.00 XXXX to XXXX-1 YYYY to YYYY-5 d. Domestic purchases of services supported by Non-VAT ORs 64,420.54 ZZZZ to ZZZZ-1 AAAAA to AAAAA-2 e. Domestic purchases of services with invoice as support only 4,066.20 BBBBB to BBBBB-4 f. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs without 1,044.64 authority to print g. Domestic purchases of services with statement of account 164,392.62 or b illin g statement as support only 42,894.74 h . Domestic purchases of services supported by zero-rated 10,997.14 ORs only i. Domestic purchases of services supported by photocopied 42,093.41 VAT ORs only 80,191.72 j. Domestic purchases of services supported by CTC of official 1,134,657.93 receipts which have no TIN of the Company p 2,326,863.58 k. Domestic purchases of services with certification from supplier as support only l. Domestic purchases of services supported by provisional receipt only m . Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs dated out of the calendar year 2 008 n. Domestic purchases of goods without supporting documents o. Domestic purchases of services without supporting documents Subtotal SECOND QUARTER OF 2008 p 93 ,071.90 CCCCC to CCCCC-1 DDDDD to DDDDD-1 a. Domestic purchases of goods with OR as support only 302.14 EEEEE to EEEEE-1 b. Domestic purchases of goods supported by invoices without 1,516.07 FFFFF to FFFFF-4 authority to print GGGGG to GGGGG-14 c. Domestic purchases of goods supported by photocopied VAT 1,690.49 HHHHH to HHHHH-6 invoices only 36,667.50 IIIli to IIIII-2 d. Domestic purchases of goods with statement of account or 1 , 5 4 8 , 5 5 3 .2 6 JJJJJ to JJJJJ-2 KKKKK to KKKKK-5 billing statement support only 17,978.65 LLLLL to LLLLL-1 e. Domestic purchases of services supported by Non-VAT ORs MMMMM to MMMMM-7 25,446.43 only 77,407 .11 f. Domestic purchases of services with invoices as support only g. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs without 2,411.05 authority to print 217,564.00 h. Domestic purchases of services with statement of account 6,882.86 or billing statem ent as sup port only 186,984.62 i. Domestic purchases of services supp orted by CTC of OR p 2,216,476.08 which have no TIN of the company j. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs dated out of the calendar year 2008 k. Domestic purchases of services supported by provisional receipt only l. Domestic purchases of goods without supporting documents m. Domestic purchases of services without supporting documents Subtotal

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 29 of37 THIRD QUARTER OF 2008 r 2,678.57 00000 to 00000-1 PPPPP to PPPPP-3 a. Domestic purchases of goods with OR as support only 2,063.97 b. Domestic purchases of goods supported by invoices without QQQQQ to QQQQQ-3 9,600.34 RRRRR to RRRRR-57 authority to print 732,610.78 c. Domestic purchases of services with certification from SSSSS to SSSSS-3 1,333.24 TTTTT to TTTTT-14 supplier as support only UUUUU to UUUUU-1 1,490, 783.20 VVVVV to VVVVV-6 d. Domestic purchases of services with invoice as support only WWWWW to WWWWW-6 e. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs without 4 .29 32,544.42 authority to print f. Domestic purchases of services with statement of account or 6,085.37 12,349.29 billing statement as support only g. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs without 171,335.32 p 2,461,388.79 TIN VAT h. Domestic purchases of services supported by Non-VAT ORs i. Domestic purchases of services supported by provisional receipt only j. Domestic purchases of goods without supporting documents k. Domestic purchases of services without supporting documents Subtotal FOURTH QUARTER OF 2008 a. Domestic purchases of goods with OR as support only r 60,448.12 XXXXX to XXXXX-6 104,876.91 YYYYY to YYYYY-6 b. Domestic purchases of goods supported by invoices without ZZZZZ to ZZZZZ-1 6,873.21 AAAAAA to AAAAAA-2 authority to print 1,801.50 BBBBBB to BBBBBB-2 23,064 .88 CCCCCC to CCCCCC-62 c. Domestic purchases of goods supported by photocopied VAT DDDDDD to DDDDDD-2 EEEEEE to EEEEEE-5 invoices only FFFFFF to FFFFFF-1 GGGGGG to GGGGGG-1 d. Domestic purchases of goods with statement of account or HHHHHH to HHHHHH-1 billing statement support IIIIII to IIIIII-3 e. Domestic purchases of services with certification from JJJJJJ to JJJJJJ-4 supplier as support only KKKKKK to KKKKKK-43 f. Domestic purchases of services with invoices as support only 996,575 .32 g. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs without 397.44 authority to print 3,448.34 h . Domestic purchases of services with statement of account 10 , 125 .00 10,560.00 or billing statement as support 1 , 8 0 3 , 5 2 6 .6 8 i. Domestic purchases of services supported by zero rated ORs only j. Domestic purchases of services supported by CTC of official receipts which have no TIN of the Company k. Domestic purchases of services supported by certified copies of official receipts which have no TIN of the Company l. Domestic purchases of services supported by Non-VAT ORs 5,007.86 m . Domestic purchases of services supported by provisional 38,461.70 696,017.41 receipt n. Domestic purchases of services supported by ORs dated out of the calendar year 2008 o. Domestic purchases of goods without supporting documents 19,660.75 p. Domestic purchases of services without supporting 355,648.21 documents Subtotal p 4,136,493.33 Total Exceptions Noted for the First, Second, Third and p 11,141,221.78 Fourth Quarter of 2008 The Court finds the noted exceptions of the Independent CPA in order. The aforesaid input taxes of P11,141,221.78 shall be disallowed from petitioner's claim for not being t properly substantiated by VAT invoices or receipts as prescribed under Sections llO(A) and 113(A) and (B) of the

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 30 of37 NIRC of 1997, as amended, in relation to Sections 4.110-1, 4 . 110-8 , and 4 . 113- 1 of Revenue Regulations No. 16-05 , as amended. In addition, input taxes in the amount of P141 ,445 ,432 .89 , detailed below, shall likewise be disallowed: Exhibit Supplier' s l �t Qtr 2nd Qtr INPUT VAT 4th Qtr Total Name 3 rd Qtr 1. Domestic purchases of services supported by VAT official receipts stamped with "Certified True Copy" "JJ-1" RCBC Realty Corp r 1,320.00 r 1,320.00 "JJ-2" RCBC Realty Corp 6 ,000.00 6,000.00 "JJ-2" RCBC Realty Corp 688,050.79 688 ,050 .79 "JJ-3" 6750 Ayala Avenue "JJ-3" Joint Venture 930,191.69 930,191.69 "JJ-3" 6750 Ayala Avenue "JJ-"3" Joint Venture 65,673.72 65 ,673 .72 6750 Ayala Avenue Joint Venture 202 ,613.33 202,613 .33 6750 Ayala Avenue Joint Venture 16,962 .95 16,962 .95 6 ,000.00 6,000 .00 "J J - 4 " RCBC Realty Corp "JJ-5" Headstrong 792.45 792.45 "JJ-6" Philippines, Inc. "JJ-7" Headstrong 22,391.47 22,391.47 Philippines, Inc. 29,801.20 29 ,801.20 Headstrong P1,969,797.60 P1 ,969 ,797.60 Philippines, Inc. Subtotal 2. Domestic purchase of r 7,071.42 r 7 ,071.42 services without supporting VAT p 7 ,071.42 p 7,071.42 official receipt Copylandia Office Systems Corporation (OR indicated per schedule- OR 177398 dated 10/15/08) Subtotal 3 . Domestic purchases of r 10,875.80 r 10,875.80 services supported by VAT official receipts 2 ,400.00 2,400.00 wherein the VAT was 3,000.00 3 ,000.00 not separately indicated DHL Express GG-14 (Philippines) Corp. Angara Abello Concepcion GG-21 Regala and Cruz Ponce Enrile Reyes and Manalastas Law GG-24 Offices

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 31 of37 GG-41 Newport Learning 4,285.71 10,700.94 4 ,285.71 Center Inc. 17,704.27 GG-59 Network 16,744.51 10,022.21 16,744 .51 GG-84 Solutions and 66, 150.00 66,150.00 GG-89 Interfaces Corp. 3,426.64 GG-143 CSO International 4,777.40 19,578.86 4 ,777.40 GG-177 Inc. 126,947.37 15,419 .89 126 ,9 4 7 .37 GG-178 DHL Express 10,478,365.06 10,478,365.06 GG-179 (Philippines) Corp. 7,655,020.90 2 ,245.23 7,655 , 020 .90 GG-180 9 ,534,104.70 9,586.47 9,534, 104.70 GG-209 Facilities 788,481.62 3 ,854.97 788,481.62 GG-217 Managers, Inc. 884,068.10 11 ,329.48 884 ,068.10 GG-286 689,565.00 19,578.86 689,565.00 Accenture Inc. 507,817.22 2,141.67 5 0 7 ,8 1 7 . 2 2 II-120 13,508.19 II-164 Accenture Inc. p 10,700 .94 II-165 750.00 17,704.27 II-166 Accenture Inc. 13,508.19 10,022 .21 II-167 20,351.30 Accenture Inc. 20,109.45 3,426.64 II-168 13,875.09 19,578.86 II-169 Accenture Inc. 14,846.73 15,419.89 II-170 II- 171 Accenture Inc. 2 ,245.23 II-172 II-173 Accenture Inc. 9,586.47 II-174 3 ,854.97 II-175 Asia Special 11,329.48 II-179 Situations M3P2 19,578.86 II-214 (SPV-AMC) , Inc. 2 , 141.67 Frasers 13,508. 19 II-221 Hospitality II-222 Investments, Inc. 750.00 II-223 Frasers 13,508.19 II -2 2 4 Hospitality 20,351.30 Investments, Inc. 20,109.45 Frasers 13,875.09 Hospitality 14,846 .73 Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Firstfoods Food Services, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 32 of37 II-236 Somerset Salcedo 14,139.60 14,139.60 II-278 Makati Service 10,648,827.67 10,648,827.67 II-279 Residences II-280 1,440,559.62 1,440,559.62 II-281 Accenture, Inc. 9,763,213.71 9,763,213.71 II-283 Accenture, Inc. 420,866.92 420,866 .92 II-375 405,569.82 405,569.82 Accenture, Inc. II-421 6,464.45 6,464.45 Accenture, Inc. II-422 14,062.87 14,062.87 Accenture, Inc. II-423 Manila Bean 5,459.63 5,459.63 Food Group Inc. II-424 Manila Bean 44,196.43 44 , 196.43 II-460 Food Group Inc. Manila Bean 1,944.00 1,944 .00 II-461 Food Group Inc. 306,904.15 306,904. 15 Makati Shangri- 11-478 La Manila 321.43 321.43 II-479 Santa Fe Moving 13,186.84 13,186.84 and Relocation 27,672.37 27,672.37 II-481 Services Phils., KK-114 Inc. 752,426.00 752,426.00 KK-116 13,891,381.93 KK-134 Accenture, Inc. 1"13,891,381.93 12,717,117. 15 KK-138 Ricardo A. Delos 12,717,117.15 12,676,062.73 KK-150 Santos 12,676,062.73 KK-167 Asian Relocation 9,612,141.40 9,612,141.40 KK-175 Management Inc. 459,532.07 459,532.07 KK-216 668,644.01 668,644.01 KK-220 Ascott Makati 303,036.64 303,036.64 Larsen and 278,693.95 278,693.95 LL-9 Tourbo Infotech 414,887.25 414,887.25 MM- Limited 103 r 4,660.71 4,660.71 MM- Accenture, Inc. 104 11,383,895.64 11,383,895.64 MM- Accenture, Inc. 105 15,916,240.89 15,916,240.89 MM- Accenture, Inc. 198 1,115.16 1, 115.16 MM- Accenture, Inc. 219 15,384.31 15,384.31 MM- Accenture, Inc. 5,329 ,657.24 5,329,657.24 277 Accenture, Inc. 68,381.45 68,381.45 MM- 278 Accenture, Inc. 17,214.90 17,214.90 MM- Accenture, Inc. 22,717.25 22,717.25 279 Accenture, Inc. 216,249.60 216,249.60 MM- Sky Signs 280 Incorporated 18,934.54 18,934.54 MM- Accenture, Inc. 281 Accenture, Inc. Rajah Travel Corporation Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Accenture, Inc. Ascott Makati Asia Special Situations M3P2 (SPV-AMC) Inc. Asia Special Situations M3P2 (SPV-AMC) Inc. EDS Electronic Data Systems (Phils) Inc. Asia Special Situations M3P2 (SPV-AMC) Inc.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 33 of37 MM- Asia Special 831.12 831.12 282 12,028.02 12 ,028 .02 Situations M3P2 17,751.13 17,751.13 MM- 25,813.10 25,813.10 283 (SPV-AMC) Inc. 16,086.96 16,086.96 16,086.96 16 ,086 .96 MM- Asia Special 21,960.82 21,960.82 284 16,641.69 16,641.69 Situations M3P2 17,214.90 17,214.90 MM- 285 (SPV-AMC) Inc. 554 .72 554 .72 22,717.26 22,717.26 MM- Asia Special 25,107.70 25,107.70 286 Situations M3P2 554.72 554.72 MM- 16,641.69 16,641.69 287 (SPV-AMC) Inc . 24,271.57 24,271.57 18,286.13 18,286.13 MM- Frasers 24,937.74 24,937 .74 288 Hospitality 18,897.56 18,897.56 Investments, Inc. 27,561.72 27,561.72 MM- Frasers 17,674.70 17,674 .70 289 Hospitality 18,286.13 18,286.13 Investments, Inc. 18,897.56 18,897.56 MM- 19,452.28 19,452.28 290 Frasers 22,517.17 22,517.17 Hospitality 26,670.08 26 ,670.08 MM- Investments, Inc. 25,889 .68 25,889 .68 291 Frasers Hospitality MM- Investments, Inc. 292 Frasers MM- Hospitality 293 Investments, Inc. Frasers MM- Hospitality 294 Investments, Inc. MM- Frasers 295 Hospitality Investments, Inc. MM- 296 Frasers Hospitality MM - Investments, Inc. 297 Frasers Hospitality MM- Investments, Inc. 298 Frasers MM- Hospitality 299 Investments, Inc. MM - Frasers 300 Hospitality Investments, Inc. MM- Frasers 301 Hospitality Investments, Inc. MM- 302 Frasers Hospitality MM - Investments, Inc. 303 Frasers MM- Hospitality 304 Investments, Inc. Frasers MM- Hospitality 305 Investments, Inc. Frasers MM- Hospitality 306 Investments, Inc. Frasers MM- Hospitality 307 Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc. Frasers Hospitality Investments, Inc.

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 34 of37 MM- Frasers 4,343.73 4 ,343.73 308 Hospitality 2,798 .24 2 ,798.24 Investments, Inc. 2,420.57 2 ,420 .57 MM- Frasers 3,589 .67 3 ,589.67 309 Hospitality Investments, Inc. 11 ,720.33 11 ,720.33 MM- Frasers 310 Hospitality 20,453 .75 20,453 .75 Investments, Inc. MM- Frasers 2 5 ,8 1 7 .6 5 25 ,817.65 311 Hospitality Investments, Inc. 22,730.40 22,730.40 MM- Fresh N' 312 Famous Foods, 19 , 0 7 6 .8 6 1 9 , 0 7 6 .8 6 MM- Inc. - Delifrance 313 Somerset 1,927.92 1,927.92 MM- Salcedo Makati 314 Fuji Xerox 3,374 .23 3,374.23 MM - Philippines, Inc. 315 Fuji Xerox 71.25 71.25 MM- Philippines, Inc. 316 Fuji Xerox MM- Philippines, Inc. 317 Manila Bean MM- Food Group Inc. 318 Manila Bean MM- Food Group Inc. 342 Yellow Can Food Corporation P30,772,603.39 P24,088 ,353.95 P51 ,021,497. 13 P33,586, 109.40 P139,468,563.87 Subtotal P30, 772,603.39 P26,058, 151.55 P51 ,028,568.55 P33,586, 109.40 P141,445,432.89 Total The input taxes under No. 1 in the amount of P1,969 ,797.60 pertaining to petitioner's domestic purchases of services shall be denied because the supporting VAT official receipts which were merely stamped "Certified True Copy'' cannot be given credence and probative value because it cannot be ascertained whether the certifier whose name or signature appearing in each of the official receipt is actually the authorized custodian of the said document. The input taxes under No. 2 in the amount of P7 ,071.42 pertaining to petitioner's domestic purchase of services from Copylandia Office Systems Corporation shall also be denied because the corresponding VAT official receipt with serial number 177398 and dated October 15, 2008 as indicated in the Schedule of Input Taxes was not presented by petitioner. The input taxes under No. 3 in the amount of P139 ,468 ,563.87 shall likewise be disallowed because the VAT was not separately indicated in the supporting VAT official receipts in violation of Section 113(B)(2)(a) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended. ~

D EC IS ION CTA Case No. 8064 Considering all of the aforesaid disallowances, out of the total input VAT claim of P206,659,149 .05, only the amount of P54 ,072,494.38 represents petitioner's valid input tax, computed as follows: 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total In put VAT Claim , 43,772,037.59 , 42,879,047.88 , 68,549,680 .43 , 51 ,458,383.15 P206,659, 149.05 Less: Disa llowances 2,326,863.58 2,216 ,4 76 .08 2,46 1,388.79 4 , 136,493 .33 11 , 141 ,221.78 Per !CPA's report 3 0 ,772,6 03.39 26,0 58, 151.55 51,028,568.55 33,586, 109.40 141 ,445,432.89 Per th is Court' s further P10,672,570.62 P14,604,420.25 P15,059,723.09 P13,735,780.42 P54,072,494.38 verifica tion Valid Input VAT At this point, the Court would take into consideration the output taxes reported by petitioner in its Quarterly VAT Returns for the year 2008 and would compare the same with the foregoing substantiated input taxes, to wit: Output Tax 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Valid In put Tax P16,135,373.10 P16,642 ,302.04 P18 ,832 ,012 .82 P21,286,141.37 P72,895 ,829 .33 Output Tax Still Due 10,672,570 .62 14,604,420.25 15,059,723.09 13,735,780.42 54,072 ,494.38 P5,462,802.48 P2,037,881.79 P3,772,289.73 P7,550,360.95 P18,823,334.95 As shown above, petitioner's properly substantiated input taxes for the year 2008 are not enough to cover its output taxes for the same year. While petitioner reflected in its Quarterly VAT Return46 for the first quarter of 2008 , the amount of P196,500,668.53 as "Input Tax Carried Over from Previous Quarter", the Court found that petitioner failed to present VAT invoices or receipts to prove the existence of such amount. Hence , the input tax carry-over of P196 ,500 ,668.53 cannot be validly applied against petitioner's output tax for the year 2008 pursuant to Section 110 of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, which states: "SEC. 110. Tax Credits. - (A) Creditable Input Tax. - (1) Any input tax evid enced by a VAT in voice or official receipt issued in accordance with Section 113 hereof on the followjng transactions sha ll b e credita ble against the output tax: fr 46 Exhibit "F".

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 36 of37 XXX XXX XXX (B) Excess Output or Input Tax. - If at the end of any taxable quarter the output tax exceeds the input tax, the excess shall be paid by the VAT-registered person. If the input tax exceeds the output tax, the excess shall be carried over to the succeeding quarter or quarters. xxx" Since there is no excess input VAT which may be the subject of a claim for refund or tax credit under Section 112(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, the instant claim must be denied. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Petition for Review is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. ~c<~ AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice CONCURS: ATTESTATION I attest that the conclusions in the above Decision were reached in consultation before the case was writer of the opinion of the Court's Division. LO As soc� stice Ch "rperson

DECISION CTA Case No. 8064 Page 37 of37 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution and the Division Chairperson's Attestation, it is hereby certified that the conclusions in the above Decision were reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court's Division. Presiding Justice