cta_decision CTA Case No. 13401340 1965-11-11

CTA Case No. 1340 (Decision)

~ F.T' fl r TC OF THE PHTUPPI l " 9 <... vu.tU OF TAX APPEAL::l QU.E.ZON CITY . r, . .,., .. ..., '")'. ...., .. il ..... I: d1 - -' - - - - - - - 'C 1~ I 0 ... t"O e o~ e t a t0 of' . on r ol nt ti �V tt .n r � sr l ..r..: 'lea. r . ~ nd 1 t !1 � t tO t ~ 0 ." ' nd . 6? . ""P r o, lt? , p t - ... ap;)'1 r~ t d " r ' ) t. . J c to 1 wn oh � "' - '1 .:!la 6<::! ltl. i.l l , 1. ., ; n r 1 , Lt ' . i 11. 1 on ~c 0 � ca.!.n ' (:c., .,,, ' ta. �t ::.at 1t1on tr t "' t ill 1 �n v . . llm' t a. �"rt. r � > :tr co ntrt .t' o 0 ~ 1 �� 'j . pi .~ g , . b t s on , " :):.,. ~ r .a 11 i �t ?O �p, rt h ' 0 t l S�li s .. ~ k Q, 0' ')nogr r d0 t ' QV i o i j) ' �l t ' :1 os:nr 252

- 'il",j � � '} ., - 1tc: � f -u~.~ .-.. ... u , ... , ,1 � \ ... 0 �n. t .. 1 ~A' \�t I� ""'h "' ... .. ' 1 t;} .... r. .,I ~~ r,"' l �� �!} �i r- r,,::. J � .1~ ;-' .br.� v;t Ih")! ~ � ..... . ' ."1 � .. 1"'..., 1..""'~~ ...-.~' .. i i ... , 1- oom :r ~ ....;.. . ... 1 \ .,."'. ~ ~ ~ ~,J- .. o t;i '" l' !'l Q\J �.! ... ,.. f" 1 � "' f" 1 .l. .~ f'!, ' .. te i (!'C,ln,.. r J 1.- ''" )�5'4 ' '1 ""'! - (\(.~ ....1' . d do- 'L1.- i � � th ld i~i-= y ~f ~ l'!:'J n , l t r l'''"l''''1 nf ~�2 , I�.7A. ''6 nd � � ~6'1 . ;)') � " lt '�., "' n at ' ...}"\ t�e "'"" t ion ;t 253

... c ' � - t ' l 0 l ) 254

� ' t 1 n r ont. 255

-,) / l.~ � �� ., . .. ,,,.,. ,. l � .. t. li ' r.:.r� d � "' te ~ u i;t l'i.i 5, ly'l '" l . tll~ �\.-. ....,:._ ~ ! ;f' ,...,<.~ .... �1 il< f ' ,.~ t� ;. t . . t ~i ...;.. "' ~~ _ t;. i~�' .... t: 1.. . .�.~ .' l' 256

3, . t t t � r ~. - ,, � 257

'� .. ' r w ro ' t t r L .. 258

- J- t r- ., � t �. .. 259

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.