CTA Case No. 2640 (Decision)
~\ff' 1 1!1.-IC OFT I� I'Hll~I!'P :-IU~ (,(Jl hT llF "AA. )PEALS QUEZON CITY I "" .' - ' � I 1 1 rt v 9 r 0 0 ... n r � . r t s~ l �� c by i t t ' \ �---- ' 0 � I ( 1/
� ' .' ' � 1 ?3 r - , r( - 155 17
0 .oo 1.- .io I 5- , . �Of C 1 s~ 156
4- f 1 t ur ( 0 r r� t 2 .J l l :J � f to 157
� ' d 73 - 9, ' i) � ... t ,......
�J ~ .,.) 1 1d r u0
-� -.... l! t
-
o. ... 9 ut
-
11 - ,. - '
2 .... - ... u , I � .. ti 1 cf
... ... 3 - t ' 23 0- d ' 1G6
.� ' ..... "" ~n nz h v 1 rh T :-e n u� OI!"\ly ' 'il:.n f . ~t t .:.n th.e.r Wl.:>t .:r1 s � 1957 ��O 226-57t ,. a ilir\':P tee 0~ n ,() 0 1 l t li .no 167
- - 26' -5 i t ." r - 0 t ! i :f f � t � 1 0 ht r eou ot ... r t. 1 n r
... � - X .. .x l' 1- '
-7 .( ) e h 7a is- 1 �
.:.. ..6 0 1 l'l ' 1 0 .u. ' 'l 1 f-4-i-"-- �.
-� ... .. ' � � ' -
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.