CTA Case No. 3912 (Resolution)
V.\JRLIC OF t'H� f'WtLlPPINf� ~ou~r' Of TA~ . rp��AL.cr OV,~ZON Cl""? � .. lJ 1 u o IC � LTD�� HE Peti tion r, v - - v rs c . � � C E � 3912 X- - MIS IO I nd n � L u 1' I ting n .he I i n To i~hdr iti n or vi w" f 1 by c r it r on c r 10, 1 0 r und n t t . 1 t r of the si n co i i n r o Int.rn 1 nu � cto r # 1 rh ih o n of nt 122, 174.22 r th d c nt ry n ci nc t p X in, nc X rox c i I y r� e 59 4 n in cnr 1 cn1 � -7372~47 bo h nd 0 bj ction da r 10, hr 1 on pr 0 r n n � id 1ni h � cc rdingl , 1 t h p titi n for r vi d ith n his c con id r cl n t in � D D. u on i y, M tr � 0 r 2~ 1 � 352
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMGLASCO AGUILA GLASS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10173)
- CTA Case No. 1063 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1063)
- CTA Case No. 2868 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2868)
- PETNET, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9113)
- ECOLOGY SAVINGS BANK, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6239)
- KUEHNE + NAGEL, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10216)
- CTA Case No. 116 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 116)
- BASF PHILIPPINES, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9747)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.