CTA Case No. 1110 (Decision)

I d~ Of" I, -- . � l. 0 ��� ________ ., r.., I 1or k i t Ol � t ola Xp 1 1 1 l t i oz r 1 0s r 1 57 � to ~ .0 � b 0 0 � 3 .1 oun 0 59. v ,;� 0 .s se to n~ :PI".id ,nd !' 1 �. y 0 hy 1t c nt ,21 9... 9. r0 5. ' an u 0 ' l1 ruct1o 00 0 00 118

-- l pe . . 1o !� 119

3c0 11 n. ? ( . - 0 � 2� (r - 1 47 . ) t t �o l.;J r~ 1 n �. ou ( 0 i ) notio i lO l. " b r � h t ".d 0 t20

�0 � - ... iv 1 . ~ ::.i p i � ~ ) l . � ., ,I..., .).")� 7 'li"�1 # " e.G. 0'1 .� 0 i- tb lot l� . ru' ' ~ � .,4 � ., p:. t s1 i � qL� l H 0!! . 1 u t .. " d 16 t lt 1 (� J . t t rl a o' r.-;:7 ' (2) ' ....c~P. �~ t .l~e (' j� t ort 0 .f "' ~ 1 ..~ a 1 n (! i o 1o th t , in 'U ( 1 1d t v it r' u X(! v 1 or �e ti on .. .tf'!. �� 121 . ~.

� -, - - on lots -j 0 t 0d y -.. 0 0 0 0 1. , v � ( )).;J t � t t 1. , '� � � - 9 29, .1 1 1. 122

- .... ' e ... 1 � � .. ' � � � :� 1 23