CTA Case No. 3223 (Resolution)
TAATS TRAVEL OERVICE, me ., etitio er, -vr a- C. T. � CJ & � HO . 322.3 CO 'ISoi L REVENU 't H spond nt. �' 0 L U T I 0 It ppe rin that th petitioner is no longer in- t re..,t d in ur uing its ap 1 to thi Court a indi- c t din the � nifest tion nd lotion to \1ithd aw" ' i1 d on J'u1y 1 , 1 on the ground th t tle v lou ount 0 OV nt c im d as r u..YJd b1e tot 1 ing 7,223.10 ( 2,578.03 in t he lctition or �. vie{) h ve b en r lly applie s credit ain t the qu rterly and finnl inco e t x r turn fro the 1 t quart r of 1980 t ough 1983 and h v eon wholly exhau t d o~ ..Tuly 131 1 , an th r b in no objection on the p r of es ondent, th ai otio1 is her by GR. _ TLD. ACC Rnn�GLY, let the )etition or revie be d .m wit r and the bov - ntit1 d c ~e cor. sider d c1o c1 t rmin t d � ..,0 zon City, Ietro il , .Ulgu("t 9, 1I) � ~~ Pr idin Ju ge 1n r ..... \.h)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.