CTA Case No. 2183 (Decision)
a l' H :~'L'HLIC OF THE PHTLIPPJ,~E8 ( ()l'RT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY .X - ... - .. l 1 t...t} t e it�l .... � ' 1 218 J,
DC I C' C Sl':.:
... ... 220
.... . 'e ,I ... 3 ')' �t1 1on�r "" o-... 1 or l .. ... ll -nl o ' 22 1
t� 222 ''
� � � th .. r t' itt'"' t ... 22 3
... h
/ 21 3 / ... t t t 1 r 225
'/ G.. :21 3 ... / t .. - t r, 226
� � � 2.27 l
1 ... � � ' ~7 � . ( � .... ) r n rl 228 �
c CI o. "1 .... 12 ' � ..-1 t � . n. ) 1 t � o ld .. nk t � 1 on 4" on � r th r n ot t t ~ all c on t ' t o �. ' t 1 ax t n 1 11 � ( ' id 1v ll nt or nk u1r h in 0t c1 0 n y c on i. h t rf�r ith c 1 of 1 ion . - ( � 7 ' . . ) 22 9
CISicrr - C~ CA NC . 2183 13 Vi w d from th for o1ng c_reu~st nc s, w li V� th h n o gr p s d .public Act �o . 5431 m o in incom t x on corpor t1o w~ d or controlle y th Gover ~ nt , it 1 not 1. t .� to includ h r; tior: 1 Po r Co o tio t p blic of t. Philip in w ul. r- ne ing on it co 1 nt ot o r it any r it c1 . o ol tic 1 u visions t nt~rfPr ~ith th. �1'" r no by c r oration f i obli at o s u , r th Lo n It s s 11k ly for t bit o nc". or po11 tical rf ri t1 io r ~ h~ p rro ne of ~t obl1ga ion n� 1 th ~ m th llo r ~s t 1 t f r ith t with th co Q .it nt wb rras o th R ublic of t h p 111 To b t to rP pond.nt� con~ n- tion h t R ~ ublic ct !~o . ''+31 h r p al d R - u lie c .'o. 9 7, w 1 r t d t1on t t1t1o ~ r, ul oun o n 1 nc to nt by th p th h111pp w ic do not thin Co r- s in c~ 1 et-d th r alln tatut � c"' :. o . 35�7, tit o~ r wa ly uth riz to e :. tr ct 1<: �n tth t . nk. r nt thi thor y, p 1tio.n r f 111eh as 230
D .CISION ... CTA C&SF NO . 21 83 h lo for th _ lourtt Po� r P oj ct, d. 'Ld April ;, 1967, f.or th um or '12, 00 , ooo 1abl i.n 16 y ar at 6~ 1nt!'r st p r annum .. (S~e � 2..01 if. 2.0 , N"~h . A, P� 50, CTA r ~c. ) To cilttatce th~ aym � t or th loan , p titlon r wa g.rante X tiol'l fr m 11 tax under Ppt blio Act ~fo . )58 . ..ubs4!'qu ntlYt ublio 'et :~o , �ij 7 relt ratr.t titioner's xempt1on from ta:Ki s, xe~pt r~al property tax .... �To fneili tat(;: pa., "nt or 1ts n- � n on. rPs pas 5lt 1 on Jun 7, 196 , 1 1 w w 11 o � re of t prr:vious nactrn nt uthor- iaing pnt1 t1on~r to contract lotms ant1 ., xemnti ~ t t fro th pa,ym n or all tax to .n !ll 1 t to - 1 1 � 0 ou lYt Co r s rr liz d th t wi out thi x .mpt1en priv 1� , " 1tion r ul find d1..f iculty m- ting 1. t lo n obligat1 n and th Gov~rnm nt , reprrs �nted by t � 0r~sid nt hi s lf a th pr1no1 � �1 obligor 1 would finally b call d u on t.o n~ r for 1 t . In gr nting ch tax tion, h <;)t\p~ m. Court h ld that th Gcvt~rr-..~ent wa1 v~d t r .. ght to coll et t �$ fr ) ti tiono.r +.o fae111 tatf"C liquidation or 1ts l1ob~ 11- ti(lis. T. rJ R ryublie o to 0~ th . 2 31
. .. a ... 35( ......~..-"' ~:o . Cr!P li.c t ,.. ... t.., �,. ' ~ .. t . ,,.,~ ~ c. � t :! . 31 ) <:!' t f) 'a..r it ~a' i t <L c1t'" t t .. ,1 ~ ....... ....,.~t ler 232
o. , 3 16 In t 1 , th rl 1c t ,. ti ld r co � 1 1 '!' h tt l ... l yh r 1c t1 u (� . ., � ) I1 f 1 1 t't' 1 s r 0r r 3. 6 ( � �� ' c.) n 97 ' 6 t ( � 1? , lt . c �. '� 0 r. � 0 r r t1o 1 Po r c r t n, t r 1 1o r h 2 33
1 l ,� ,.".,' ,... 3' ' i
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.