CTA Case No. 2044 (Decision)
'EPU~LIC OF THE PHILIPPINJ?j COURT OF TAX APPEALI QUEZON CITY "' ttn1\ l -~ ,. I .� ro .c ~.:c~ t ... .l ;t.... . ,1. ..t .a � 7 .j ��: !.Jl l. ...... .. 150
� Jj.. .....~ ... -- ( y lO � iV: .. J. "'-" ;(,..Y ~ HI ~ ti '"""' ~r C,L 1. .:: ).~ ' .t c .. r �-� ..:. t t ~ tu 1' ~; .LJ. '..� L. . v. ). VA� 1;;', ~ te � ;;. l t... � s � J. - f the .J.loc1; x� of � t ct " , .,.(/ p e , J<~ ': t~I1l', t . .nr, l i.C r ,. u "".. l. ... ir r �._.... to ~ 151
1: �-....~r sh r t subj c tt~ h cw.dit on t t :r " ll:.< ' ti s .. tn ~ l~,.~ t VG a u:m. t 't i ic ~c . ) � (p H' -3 . m .., .:<;: . .. n >� ,;. iL Oou t� .... ' .l '!', �c.. ' ~ ''l: 1Q(!"~ J. l t ! l u a l' 0 n l t . e e . tu;t h "I .(.;.. \:J. J � 'G: \.oH, � a :.r 2) ~ 4 , 1.} 1 ~ ..t "' � u. 4-, th 12 . lu -... ... �� u, i� 15 2
� - 4- ' J: 0 1 e� l w ~ c. . l, 1 ~, ~ r- � J� h � .i. b ier. ' t 17, 1 ( . ~ ' * J.. .. - I' ' ., - 1 ts ,. 15 3
� :.1 - '' �e � ' ' , ' . '') �., � � ' c ' - � �' � u- .L ' � ' �� .'.. 154
- I- - � - b ar.-: t El e r t ..:11 , � � ; �� ot a. v , t lt-0 ' t ...1 .. tb.. ez� .it, .....empt;.. .. ' l r l' C,l, I '..<:t .u.t:!J' ~ .. ) ~; o. ..~r. "' � 1"1 I"..~ 6 'l... . tte ..,..,,c .pt J.:-. G. ~n ' , . l.,t~- w.~ . s u l>O$ .<J" leve.t ( u tn .' .. � ecr t J:J h Lc; r � ' ' 1'0 ? 15 5
... ust rns . 1 , nc . , u si vt e io.r no. t �r 1~ 1 r shoul ..J. �!' :J.:)t.4.tl l -~:.> v1 its t ;;; l t.L tJ. � 1.<\. \Itt t :t 'J..l ve kEl>J, are- K. ~ i. .r i ' e i;: ./o,. J.�() �:e ~ ...i....-U i� ~J. :� 15 6
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.